IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-11891-8_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Container Port Competition and Competitiveness Analysis: Asian Major Ports

In: Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Tae-Woo Lee

    (Soochow University)

  • Jasmine Siu Lee Lam

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University)

Abstract

This chapter evaluates the competitive edge of major Asian container ports, i.e. Busan, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Singapore ports, referring to the customer-centric community ports, so-called the Fifth Generation Ports, of which the concept has been modified for evaluation. The literature of competitiveness of container ports applied a number of methods, among others, including time series analysis, DEA and SFA methods, service quality analysis with importance-performance analysis and Kano model, multi-criteria evaluation, survey of container ship operators and logistics managers, shift-share analysis and diversification indexes such as Herfindahl–Hirschmann, marginal cost pricing approach, and game theory. The previous literature measured the relative competitiveness of ports in Asia and Europe. Such analysis results are useful to evaluate the competitiveness of container ports at the given evaluation angle at the given time. However, they do not consider port competitiveness in relation to port devolution according to a globalized economy with changes of production and distribution channels, technology, city-port interface, government policy, port users’ behavior, pricing, environmental issue, as well as security and safety. Having considered the above limitation in the literature, this chapter argues that a novel approach is required to evaluate inter-port competition in a comprehensive way to reflect cross-sectional, longitudinal and horizontal aspects of the port evolution. In this regard, it can be said that this novel approach, i.e. the Fifth Generation Ports, with empirical test by descriptive and quantitative methods contributes to port competition studies in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2015. "Container Port Competition and Competitiveness Analysis: Asian Major Ports," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Chung-Yee Lee & Qiang Meng (ed.), Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics, edition 127, chapter 4, pages 97-136, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-11891-8_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11891-8_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ludmiła Filina-Dawidowicz & Mariusz Kostrzewski, 2022. "The Complexity of Logistics Services at Transshipment Terminals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Lee, Paul Tae-Woo & Song, Zhaoyu, 2023. "Exploring a new development direction of the Belt and Road Initiative in the transitional period towards the post-COVID-19 era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Tsakiridis, Andreas & Mateo-Mantecón, Ingrid & O'Connor, Eamonn & Hynes, Stephen & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2021. "Efficiency benchmarking of Irish and North Atlantic Spanish ports: Implications for blue growth," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Merkel, Axel, 2017. "Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 40-47.
    5. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    6. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation mode for a liner company with heterogeneous ports: Business cooperation vs. port investment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 513-533.
    7. Wang, Junjin & Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Fan & Yue, Xiaohang, 2021. "Blockchain technology for port logistics capability: Exclusive or sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 347-392.
    8. Mariia Dushenko & Clemet Thærie Bjorbæk & Kenn Steger-Jensen, 2018. "Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-11891-8_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.