IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p909-d735253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Magnesium Additives on Phosphorous Recovery during Sewage Sludge Combustion and Further Improvement of Bioavailable Phosphorous

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Xiao

    (National Engineering Laboratory for Reducing Emissions from Coal Combustion, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
    Engineering Research Center of Environmental Thermal Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
    Shandong Key Laboratory of Energy Carbon Reduction and Resource Utilization, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Xiaohan Ren

    (Institute of Thermal Science and Technology, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Juan Chen

    (National Engineering Laboratory for Reducing Emissions from Coal Combustion, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
    Engineering Research Center of Environmental Thermal Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
    Shandong Key Laboratory of Energy Carbon Reduction and Resource Utilization, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

Abstract

Sewage sludge (SS), a solid waste taking up a large amount of public resources, contains abundant phosphorous and urgently needs appropriate recovery, but incineration, the existing popular SS treatment method, fails to reuse phosphorous as a feasible product due to the poor phosphorous bioavailability of SS ash. Based on the mono-combustion of SS, magnesian minerals comprising of magnesium oxide were doped with SS to carry out the behavior of magnesium in phosphorous capture and its sensitivity to subsequent thermochemical modification. Five percent MgO improved phosphorous capture, and its effectiveness was disturbed by sulfur at 900 °C. The more H 2 O that was pumped into the atmosphere, the more phosphorous was captured by 5% MgO. The capacity of MgO in phosphorous capture was inferior to that of CaO. The utilization efficiency of MgO for phosphorous capture was inferior to that of CaO. A total of 7.2% MgO succeeded in recovering 97.46% phosphorous with 5% H 2 O at 900 °C. A total of 15.06% hydromagnesite merely promoted 1.85% and 5.13% of the phosphorous relative enrichment factor ( RE ) in SS ashes without or with 5% H 2 O, respectively, whereas it recovered 90.21% phosphorous with 10% H 2 O, supposing a potentiality in phosphorous capture for the direct combustion of wet SS. However, having been improved by magnesium, the bioavailability of phosphorous in SS ash remained extremely limited. Thus, thermal modification by K 2 CO 3 was applied, where the limited bioavailability of phosphorous in the SS ashes was remarkably alleviated; although, SiO 2 and sulfate were the main disturbers and led to the production of K 2 MgSiO 4 and K 2 Mg 2 (SO 4 ) 3 . The effective constituents were KMgPO 4 and K 3 CaH(PO 4 ) 2 in the final mixed fertilizer. The obtained mixed fertilizer might be suitable for application on acidic soils.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Xiao & Xiaohan Ren & Juan Chen, 2022. "Effect of Magnesium Additives on Phosphorous Recovery during Sewage Sludge Combustion and Further Improvement of Bioavailable Phosphorous," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:909-:d:735253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/909/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/909/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2013. "Sludge: A waste or renewable source for energy and resources recovery?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 708-728.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milan Carsky & Olga Solcova & Karel Soukup & Tomas Kralik & Kamila Vavrova & Lukas Janota & Miroslav Vitek & Stanislav Honus & Marek Jadlovec & Lenka Wimmerova, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Fluidized Bed Combustion of a Mixed Fuel from Sewage and Paper Mill Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Wu, Haijun & Wang, Biao & Geng, Fanhui & Zhang, Kai & Lv, Quanwei & Xu, Jian, 2025. "Alkaline tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol pretreatment technology to achieve value-added co-liquefaction of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Arbulú, Italo & Lozano, Javier & Rey-Maquieira, Javier, 2017. "The challenges of tourism to waste-to-energy public-private partnerships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 916-921.
    4. Fabio Merzari & Jillian Goldfarb & Gianni Andreottola & Tanja Mimmo & Maurizio Volpe & Luca Fiori, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Strategy for Sewage Sludge Management: Influence of Process Withdrawal Point on Hydrochar Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Lingling Wei & Jinquan Wan & Zhicheng Yan & Yan Wang, 2025. "Fe-N-Modified Sludge Biochar for Enhanced Acetic Acid Production from Sludge Anaerobic Fermentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Farhad Beik & Leon Williams & Tim Brown & Stuart T. Wagland, 2021. "Managing Non-Sewered Human Waste Using Thermochemical Waste Treatment Technologies: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Severo, Ihana Aguiar & Siqueira, Stefania Fortes & Deprá, Mariany Costa & Maroneze, Mariana Manzoni & Zepka, Leila Queiroz & Jacob-Lopes, Eduardo, 2019. "Biodiesel facilities: What can we address to make biorefineries commercially competitive?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 686-705.
    8. Yan-Jhang Chen & Tang-Yu Fan & Li-Pang Wang & Ta-Wui Cheng & Shiao-Shing Chen & Min-Hao Yuan & Shikun Cheng, 2020. "Application of Fenton Method for the Removal of Organic Matter in Sewage Sludge at Room Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, February.
    9. Sandylove Afrane & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Prince Oppong Amoh & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah & Ebenezer Agbozo & Elmazeg Elgamli & Mokhtar Shouran & Guozhu M, 2022. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-31, July.
    10. Inesa Kniuipytė & Marius Praspaliauskas & Jonė Venclovienė & Jūratė Žaltauskaitė, 2023. "Soil Remediation after Sewage Sludge or Sewage Sludge Char Application with Industrial Hemp and Its Potential for Bioenergy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Liu, Huan & Yi, Linlin & Zhang, Qiang & Hu, Hongyun & Lu, Geng & Li, Aijun & Yao, Hong, 2016. "Co-production of clean syngas and ash adsorbent during sewage sludge gasification: Synergistic effect of Fenton peroxidation and CaO conditioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1062-1068.
    12. Semiyaga, Swaib & Okure, Mackay A.E. & Niwagaba, Charles B. & Katukiza, Alex Y. & Kansiime, Frank, 2015. "Decentralized options for faecal sludge management in urban slum areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of technologies, practices and end-uses," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 109-119.
    13. Chen, Zhidong & Hou, Yichen & Liu, Mingyu & Zhang, Guoqiang & Zhang, Kai & Zhang, Dongke & Yang, Lijun & Kong, Yanqiang & Du, Xiaoze, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analyses of sewage sludge resource utilization systems integrating Drying, Incineration, and power generation processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    14. Shao, Ling & Chen, G.Q., 2016. "Renewability assessment of a production system: Based on embodied energy as emergy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 380-392.
    15. Razmjoo, Armin & Mirjalili, Seyedali & Aliehyaei, Mehdi & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Ahmadi, Abolfazl & Majidi Nezhad, Meysam, 2022. "Development of smart energy systems for communities: technologies, policies and applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    16. Yongpeng Luo & Shenxu Bao & Siyuan Yang & Yimin Zhang & Yang Ping & Chao Lin & Pan Yang, 2021. "Characterization, Spatial Variation and Management Strategy of Sewer Sediments Collected from Combined Sewer System: A Case Study in Longgang District, Shenzhen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Elena Goldan & Valentin Nedeff & Narcis Barsan & Mihaela Culea & Claudia Tomozei & Mirela Panainte-Lehadus & Emilian Mosnegutu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Use of Sewage Sludge Biochar as a Soil Amendment—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Wu, Xiaoyan & Tian, Yu & Zhou, Xiaoliang & Kong, Xiaowei & Zhang, Jun & Zuo, Wei & Wang, Dezhen & Ye, Xuesong, 2016. "Performance and long-term stability of nickel/yttria-stabilized zirconia anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell in simulated biosyngas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-9.
    19. Ren, Jingzheng & Liang, Hanwei & Dong, Liang & Gao, Zhiqiu & He, Chang & Pan, Ming & Sun, Lu, 2017. "Sustainable development of sewage sludge-to-energy in China: Barriers identification and technologies prioritization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 384-396.
    20. Huang, Qian & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Bi-level multi-objective programming approach for carbon emission quota allocation towards co-combustion of coal and sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:909-:d:735253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.