IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v104y2015ipap109-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralized options for faecal sludge management in urban slum areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of technologies, practices and end-uses

Author

Listed:
  • Semiyaga, Swaib
  • Okure, Mackay A.E.
  • Niwagaba, Charles B.
  • Katukiza, Alex Y.
  • Kansiime, Frank

Abstract

Faecal sludge (FS), a product from on-site sanitation systems, poses a management challenge in densely populated urban slums of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Currently, FS or its liquid fraction after dewatering is co-treated with sewage in conventional treatment plants. When dewatered, the solid stream is dried and stored further as the terminal treatment or is co-treated directly with organic solid wastes in composting or anaerobic digestion systems. To implement these, FS has to be collected and transported. Also, land is needed, but it is in most cases limited in slums or their vicinity. The collection and transport of FS from slums is costly due to lack of access, traffic congestion and long travel distances to treatment plants. Moreover, uncollected FS poses health risks and pollutes surface and/or ground water within slums. This review demonstrates that currently utilized technologies and practices fall short in various ways and discusses the possibility of minimizing FS management related costs, risks and pollution in urban slums by decentralized treatment and end-use. It also discusses the possible FS-derived end-products and their benefits to urban slum dwellers. Substitution of a part of natural materials (sand and clay) when building and/or biomass (firewood and charcoal) for cooking with FS derived end-products could multiply the benefits of improved sanitation to slum dwellers.

Suggested Citation

  • Semiyaga, Swaib & Okure, Mackay A.E. & Niwagaba, Charles B. & Katukiza, Alex Y. & Kansiime, Frank, 2015. "Decentralized options for faecal sludge management in urban slum areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of technologies, practices and end-uses," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 109-119.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:104:y:2015:i:pa:p:109-119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300781
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Günther, Isabel & Horst, Alexandra & Lüthi, Christoph & Mosler, Hans-Joachim & Niwagaba, Charles B. & Tumwebaze, Innocent K., 2011. "Where do Kampala’s poor “go”? - Urban sanitation conditions in Kampala’s low-income areas," MPRA Paper 45832, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2013. "Sludge: A waste or renewable source for energy and resources recovery?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 708-728.
    3. Diener, Stefan & Semiyaga, Swaib & Niwagaba, Charles B. & Muspratt, Ashley Murray & Gning, Jean Birane & Mbéguéré, Mbaye & Ennin, Joseph Effah & Zurbrugg, Christian & Strande, Linda, 2014. "A value proposition: Resource recovery from faecal sludge—Can it be the driver for improved sanitation?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 32-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nataliya Loiko & Oleg Kanunnikov & Yuriy Litti, 2023. "Use of Alcaligenes faecalis to Reduce Coliforms and Enhance the Stabilization of Faecal Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Charles F. C. Chirwa & Ralph P. Hall & Leigh-Anne H. Krometis & Eric A. Vance & Adam Edwards & Ting Guan & Rochelle H. Holm, 2017. "Pit Latrine Fecal Sludge Resistance Using a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Low Income Areas in Mzuzu City, Malawi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Mohammad Ghorbani & Petr Konvalina & Anna Walkiewicz & Reinhard W. Neugschwandtner & Marek Kopecký & Kazem Zamanian & Wei-Hsin Chen & Daniel Bucur, 2022. "Feasibility of Biochar Derived from Sewage Sludge to Promote Sustainable Agriculture and Mitigate GHG Emissions—A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Noaga Inès Gwladys Ouedraogo & Yacouba Konaté & Boukary Sawadogo & Elfried Beré & Soumaila Sodré & Harouna Karambiri, 2023. "Characterization and Methanogenic Potential Evaluation of Faecal Sludge: Case of the Kossodo Biogas Plant in Ouagadougou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire Villette & Loïc Maurer & Julie Zumsteg & Jérôme Mutterer & Adrien Wanko & Dimitri Heintz, 2023. "Mass spectrometry imaging for biosolids characterization to assess ecological or health risks before reuse," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Meng, Xiangmei & de Jong, Wiebren & Kudra, Tadeusz, 2016. "A state-of-the-art review of pulse combustion: Principles, modeling, applications and R&D issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 73-114.
    3. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Arbulú, Italo & Lozano, Javier & Rey-Maquieira, Javier, 2017. "The challenges of tourism to waste-to-energy public-private partnerships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 916-921.
    5. Daniel Ddiba & Kim Andersson & Arno Rosemarin & Helfrid Schulte-Herbrüggen & Sarah Dickin, 2022. "The circular economy potential of urban organic waste streams in low- and middle-income countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1116-1144, January.
    6. Fabio Merzari & Jillian Goldfarb & Gianni Andreottola & Tanja Mimmo & Maurizio Volpe & Luca Fiori, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Strategy for Sewage Sludge Management: Influence of Process Withdrawal Point on Hydrochar Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Radoslaw Slezak & Hilal Unyay & Szymon Szufa & Stanislaw Ledakowicz, 2023. "An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Farhad Beik & Leon Williams & Tim Brown & Stuart T. Wagland, 2021. "Managing Non-Sewered Human Waste Using Thermochemical Waste Treatment Technologies: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Severo, Ihana Aguiar & Siqueira, Stefania Fortes & Deprá, Mariany Costa & Maroneze, Mariana Manzoni & Zepka, Leila Queiroz & Jacob-Lopes, Eduardo, 2019. "Biodiesel facilities: What can we address to make biorefineries commercially competitive?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 686-705.
    10. Yan-Jhang Chen & Tang-Yu Fan & Li-Pang Wang & Ta-Wui Cheng & Shiao-Shing Chen & Min-Hao Yuan & Shikun Cheng, 2020. "Application of Fenton Method for the Removal of Organic Matter in Sewage Sludge at Room Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, February.
    11. Reijnders, L., 2014. "Phosphorus resources, their depletion and conservation, a review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 32-49.
    12. Sandylove Afrane & Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Prince Oppong Amoh & Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah & Ebenezer Agbozo & Elmazeg Elgamli & Mokhtar Shouran & Guozhu M, 2022. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-31, July.
    13. Eui-Hwan Hong & Jun-Gyu Park & Beom Lee & Wei-Qi Shi & Hang-Bae Jun, 2019. "Improvement of Waste Dehydrated Sludge for Anaerobic Digestion through High-Temperature and High-Pressure Solubilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Inesa Kniuipytė & Marius Praspaliauskas & Jonė Venclovienė & Jūratė Žaltauskaitė, 2023. "Soil Remediation after Sewage Sludge or Sewage Sludge Char Application with Industrial Hemp and Its Potential for Bioenergy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Wu, Haijun & Li, Xinlong & Zhang, Quan & Zhang, Kai & Xu, Xia & Xu, Jian, 2022. "Promoting the conversion of poplar to bio-oil based on the synergistic effect of alkaline hydrogen peroxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 107-117.
    16. Liu, Huan & Yi, Linlin & Zhang, Qiang & Hu, Hongyun & Lu, Geng & Li, Aijun & Yao, Hong, 2016. "Co-production of clean syngas and ash adsorbent during sewage sludge gasification: Synergistic effect of Fenton peroxidation and CaO conditioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1062-1068.
    17. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il & Cho, Hyodeuk & Shim, Jaehui & Yoo, Jeongkeun & Rho, Kyutai & Choi, Seong-Geun & Park, Chanwoo & Park, Byeong-Yun, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of fry-drying and torrefaction plant for bio-solid fuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 45-53.
    18. Nazari, Laleh & Yuan, Zhongshun & Ray, Madhumita B. & Xu, Chunbao (Charles), 2017. "Co-conversion of waste activated sludge and sawdust through hydrothermal liquefaction: Optimization of reaction parameters using response surface methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Wu, Haijun & Shakeel, Usama & Zhang, Quan & Zhang, Kai & Xu, Xia & Yuan, Yamei & Xu, Jian, 2022. "Catalytic degradation of poplar by Na2CO3 and Na2CO3/Fe under various hydrothermal liquefaction processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Yi Xiao & Xiaohan Ren & Juan Chen, 2022. "Effect of Magnesium Additives on Phosphorous Recovery during Sewage Sludge Combustion and Further Improvement of Bioavailable Phosphorous," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:104:y:2015:i:pa:p:109-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.