IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6593-d910733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria Decision Approach to the Design of Floating Wind Farm Export Cables

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Díaz

    (Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • C. Guedes Soares

    (Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper addresses subsea electric cable routing using the application of decision support systems combined with the experts’ knowledge. The methodology is successfully applied to a case study on the Spanish coast. The ranking method calculates the multiple criteria weights, and the weighted product method determines the most suitable space. The environmental criteria, with a weight of 61.4%, exceed the significance of other essential criteria in the study based on experts’ considerations. These rankings are input into the model to extract the suitable spaces to deploy the underwater cable. The final result accurately highlights an optimal route in alignment with the experts’ preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Díaz & C. Guedes Soares, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Approach to the Design of Floating Wind Farm Export Cables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6593-:d:910733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maienza, C. & Avossa, A.M. & Ricciardelli, F. & Coiro, D. & Troise, G. & Georgakis, C.T., 2020. "A life cycle cost model for floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Hugo Díaz & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Pınar Miç & Z. Figen Antmen, 2021. "A Decision-Making Model Based on TOPSIS, WASPAS, and MULTIMOORA Methods for University Location Selection Problem," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    4. Díaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "An integrated GIS approach for site selection of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic continental European coastline," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Athanasios Kolios & Varvara Mytilinou & Estivaliz Lozano-Minguez & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Paweł Ziemba & Jarosław Wątróbski & Magdalena Zioło & Artur Karczmarczyk, 2017. "Using the PROSA Method in Offshore Wind Farm Location Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Salvação, N. & Guedes Soares, C., 2018. "Wind resource assessment offshore the Atlantic Iberian coast with the WRF model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 276-287.
    8. Silva, Dina & Bento, A. Rute & Martinho, Paulo & Guedes Soares, C., 2015. "High resolution local wave energy modelling in the Iberian Peninsula," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1099-1112.
    9. Mekonnen, Addisu D. & Gorsevski, Pece V., 2015. "A web-based participatory GIS (PGIS) for offshore wind farm suitability within Lake Erie, Ohio," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 162-177.
    10. Chaouachi, Aymen & Covrig, Catalin Felix & Ardelean, Mircea, 2017. "Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 179-192.
    11. Dimitra G. Vagiona & Manos Kamilakis, 2018. "Sustainable Site Selection for Offshore Wind Farms in the South Aegean—Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Fischetti, Martina & Pisinger, David, 2018. "Optimizing wind farm cable routing considering power losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 917-930.
    13. Díaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "A novel multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate floating wind farm locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 431-454.
    14. Chen, Z. & Blaabjerg, F., 2009. "Wind farm--A power source in future power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1288-1300, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clara Matutano Molina & Christian Velasco-Gallego & Nerea Portillo-Juan & Vicente Negro Valdecantos & Nieves Cubo-Mateo, 2023. "Geospatial Analysis of Scour in Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Díaz, H. & Silva, D. & Bernardo, C. & Guedes Soares, C., 2023. "Micro sitting of floating wind turbines in a wind farm using a multi-criteria framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 449-474.
    2. Díaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "A novel multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate floating wind farm locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 431-454.
    3. Hugo Díaz & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Díaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "An integrated GIS approach for site selection of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic continental European coastline," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Ziemba, Paweł, 2022. "Uncertain Multi-Criteria analysis of offshore wind farms projects investments – Case study of the Polish Economic Zone of the Baltic Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    6. Virtanen, E.A. & Lappalainen, J. & Nurmi, M. & Viitasalo, M. & Tikanmäki, M. & Heinonen, J. & Atlaskin, E. & Kallasvuo, M. & Tikkanen, H. & Moilanen, A., 2022. "Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and biodiversity in offshore wind farm design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Salvação, Nadia & Bentamy, Abderrahim & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Developing a new wind dataset by blending satellite data and WRF model wind predictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 283-295.
    8. Majidi Nezhad, Meysam & Neshat, Mehdi & Piras, Giuseppe & Astiaso Garcia, Davide, 2022. "Sites exploring prioritisation of offshore wind energy potential and mapping for wind farms installation: Iranian islands case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Xu, Ye & Li, Ye & Zheng, Lijun & Cui, Liang & Li, Sha & Li, Wei & Cai, Yanpeng, 2020. "Site selection of wind farms using GIS and multi-criteria decision making method in Wafangdian, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Eva Loukogeorgaki, 2020. "Strategic Planning of Offshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    14. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Paweł Ziemba & Jarosław Wątróbski & Magdalena Zioło & Artur Karczmarczyk, 2017. "Using the PROSA Method in Offshore Wind Farm Location Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Santiago Salvador & Xurxo Costoya & Francisco Javier Sanz-Larruga & Luis Gimeno, 2018. "Development of Offshore Wind Power: Contrasting Optimal Wind Sites with Legal Restrictions in Galicia, Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Laura Castro-Santos & Ana Rute Bento & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2020. "The Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wave Energy Farms in the North of Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Wu, Yan & Xia, Tianqi & Wang, Yufei & Zhang, Haoran & Feng, Xiao & Song, Xuan & Shibasaki, Ryosuke, 2022. "A synchronization methodology for 3D offshore wind farm layout optimization with multi-type wind turbines and obstacle-avoiding cable network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 302-320.
    19. Dimitra G. Vagiona & Manos Kamilakis, 2018. "Sustainable Site Selection for Offshore Wind Farms in the South Aegean—Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Shao, Meng & Han, Zhixin & Sun, Jinwei & Xiao, Chengsi & Zhang, Shulei & Zhao, Yuanxu, 2020. "A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 377-403.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6593-:d:910733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.