IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i3p21582440211040115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision-Making Model Based on TOPSIS, WASPAS, and MULTIMOORA Methods for University Location Selection Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Pınar Miç
  • Z. Figen Antmen

Abstract

With the growing population increase and following young population’s desire to study at the university, political authorities are supporting university and higher education investments, especially in the last 10 years. This situation has increased the number of universities considerably. Because a university will provide socioeconomic dynamism to both the development of the country and the region, choosing the right university location has become a significant problem nowadays. In line with this, this study is focused on supporting the new university location decision in a wide region in Turkey where currently the number of universities in the region is relatively low despite the high population density in the area. Alternative cities to be utilized in the study are determined particularly taking the demographic structure into consideration and various multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques are applied. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS), and Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) are applied to a real case study. Related criteria and alternative locations are specified by consulting seven experts. Within the study, both the results of these methods are presented, and also sensitivity analyses are conducted to observe how sensitive the results are to the changes in the criteria weights. The results obtained are purposed to aid decision makers in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Pınar Miç & Z. Figen Antmen, 2021. "A Decision-Making Model Based on TOPSIS, WASPAS, and MULTIMOORA Methods for University Location Selection Problem," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211040115
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211040115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211040115
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211040115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shima Lashgari & Jurgita Antuchevičienė & Alireza Delavari & Omid Kheirkhah, 2014. "Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 729-743, September.
    2. Professor Snezana UROSEVIC & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Dragisa STANUJKIC & Mladjan MAKSIMOVIC, 2017. "An Approach to Personnel Selection in the Tourism Industry Based on the SWARA and the WASPAS Methods," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(1), pages 75-88.
    3. Ding, Lan & Zeng, Yao, 2015. "Evaluation of Chinese higher education by TOPSIS and IEW — The case of 68 universities belonging to the Ministry of Education in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 341-358.
    4. Chia-Nan Wang & Van Thanh Nguyen & Hoang Tuyet Nhi Thai & Duy Hung Duong, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approaches for Solar Power Plant Location Selection in Viet Nam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Neha Ghorui & Arijit Ghosh & Ebrahem A. Algehyne & Sankar Prasad Mondal & Apu Kumar Saha, 2020. "AHP-TOPSIS Inspired Shopping Mall Site Selection Problem with Fuzzy Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Ayşegül Tuş & Esra Aytaç Adalı, 2019. "The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 528-538, June.
    7. Nihan Çetin Demirel & Muhammet Deveci & Gizem Eser, 2016. "Comparative analysis of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for location selection of Textile plant in Turkey," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 4006524, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    8. Vijay Manikrao Athawale & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Shankar Chakraborty, 2012. "Decision making for facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1/2), pages 16-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hugo Díaz & C. Guedes Soares, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Approach to the Design of Floating Wind Farm Export Cables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Dongmei Jing & Mohsen Imeni & Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah & Alhanouf Alburaikan & Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, 2023. "Optimal Selection of Stock Portfolios Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Bączkiewicz & Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Andrii Shekhovtsov & Mykhailo Yelmikheiev & Volodymyr Kozlov & Wojciech Sałabun, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Solar Panels with Determination of Local Significance Levels of Criteria Using the MCDM Methods Resistant to the Rank Reversal Phenomenon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Pedro Ponce & Citlaly Pérez & Aminah Robinson Fayek & Arturo Molina, 2022. "Solar Energy Implementation in Manufacturing Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS and S4 Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Sung-Shun Weng & Yang Liu & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2019. "Reform of Chinese Universities in the Context of Sustainable Development: Teacher Evaluation and Improvement Based on Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro & Dalia Štreimikienė & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2020. "Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. S. Roseline & V. Paramasivam & R. Anandhakrishnan & P. R. Lakshminarayanan, 2019. "Numerical evaluation of zirconium reinforced aluminium matrix composites for sustainable environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 653-667, April.
    6. Zydrune Morkunaite & Romualdas Bausys & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Contractor Selection for Sgraffito Decoration of Cultural Heritage Buildings Using the WASPAS-SVNS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Sudipa Choudhury & Apu Kumar Saha & Mrinmoy Majumder, 2020. "Optimal location selection for installation of surface water treatment plant by Gini coefficient-based analytical hierarchy process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4073-4099, June.
    8. Nandi, Sandip & Granata, Giuseppe & Jana, Subrata & Ghorui, Neha & Mondal, Sankar Prasad & Bhaumik, Moumita, 2023. "Evaluation of the treatment options for COVID-19 patients using generalized hesitant fuzzy- multi criteria decision making techniques," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Maha Bennani & Fouad Jawab & Yasmina Hani & Abderrahman ElMhamedi & Driss Amegouz, 2022. "A Hybrid MCDM for the Location of Urban Distribution Centers under Uncertainty: A Case Study of Casablanca, Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Deveci, Muhammet & Özcan, Ender & John, Robert & Öner, Sultan Ceren, 2018. "Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set method for improving the service quality of domestic airlines in Turkey," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 83-98.
    11. Nebiyu Kedir & Phuong H. D. Nguyen & Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Aminah Robinson Fayek, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Fuzzy Hybrid Methods in Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Guidance for Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-38, April.
    12. Gang Kou & Özlem Olgu Akdeniz & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Singh Doorga, Jay Rovisham & Rughooputh, Soonil D.D.V. & Boojhawon, Ravindra, 2019. "High resolution spatio-temporal modelling of solar photovoltaic potential for tropical islands: Case of Mauritius," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 972-987.
    14. Khalid Aljohani, 2023. "Optimizing the Distribution Network of a Bakery Facility: A Reduced Travelled Distance and Food-Waste Minimization Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Bakır Mahmut & Akan Şahap & Durmaz Emrah, 2019. "Exploring service quality of low-cost airlines in Europe: An integrated MCDM approach," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 109-130, June.
    16. Jalil Heidary Dahooie & Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan & Zahra Shoaei Naeini & Amir Salar Vanaki & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2022. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making Aggregation Method and Geographic Information System for Selecting Optimal Solar Power Plants in Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Chia-Nan Wang & Van Tran Hoang Viet & Thanh Phong Ho & Van Thanh Nguyen & Syed Tam Husain, 2020. "Optimal Site Selection for a Solar Power Plant in the Mekong Delta Region of Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Mohammad Javad Bidel & Hossein Safari & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2022. "A Framework for Project Delivery Systems via Hybrid Fuzzy Risk Analysis: Application and Extension in ICT," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Prodromos Chatzoglou & Dimitrios Chatzoudes & Zografia Petrakopoulou & Elena Polychrou, 2018. "Plant location factors: a field research," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 749-786, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211040115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.