IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v56y2019i2d10.1007_s12597-019-00371-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem

Author

Listed:
  • Ayşegül Tuş

    (Pamukkale University)

  • Esra Aytaç Adalı

    (Pamukkale University)

Abstract

Keeping track of employees’ time and attendance is difficult and time-consuming task for the companies. Today many companies are performing the digital time and attendance systems that automatically track and process the data to improve their operations and save money. There are many alternatives for the time and attendance systems in the market and appropriate selection among them is not easy in the presence of multiple, usually conflicting, criteria. So this selection may be considered as a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem. In this paper, the new combined decision making approach based on Criteria Importance Through Inter criteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods is used for the time and attendance software selection problem of the private hospital. The weights of the criteria are determined by CRITIC method and the alternatives are ranked by WASPAS method for finding the most suitable alternative. The novelty of this paper to the literature is to combine CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the first time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayşegül Tuş & Esra Aytaç Adalı, 2019. "The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 528-538, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00371-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shima Lashgari & Jurgita Antuchevičienė & Alireza Delavari & Omid Kheirkhah, 2014. "Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 729-743, September.
    2. Dinglin Liu & Xianglian Zhao, 2013. "Method and Application for Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation with Subjective and Objective Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Romualdas Baušys & Marius Lazauskas, 2015. "Sustainable Assessment of Alternative Sites for the Construction of a Waste Incineration Plant by Applying WASPAS Method with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Halim Kazan & Omer Ozdemir, 2014. "Financial Performance Assessment of Large Scale Conglomerates Via Topsis and Critic Methods," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(4), pages 203-224.
    5. Halim Kazan & Ömer Özdemir, 2014. "Financial Performance Assessment of Large Scale Conglomerates Via Topsis and Critic Methods," International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(4), pages 203-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Vukašin Pajić & Milorad Kilibarda & Milan Andrejić, 2023. "A Novel Hybrid Approach for Evaluation of Resilient 4PL Provider for E-Commerce," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Muhammet Deveci & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Ilgin Gokasar & Rumeysa Tuna Deveci, 2023. "Prioritization of healthcare systems during pandemics using Cronbach’s measure based fuzzy WASPAS approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 279-307, September.
    4. Asante, Dennis & Ampah, Jeffrey Dankwa & Afrane, Sandylove & Adjei-Darko, Peter & Asante, Bismark & Fosu, Edward & Dankwah, Dennis Ampah & Amoh, Prince Oppong, 2022. "Prioritizing strategies to eliminate barriers to renewable energy adoption and development in Ghana: A CRITIC-fuzzy TOPSIS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 47-65.
    5. Aleksandra Bączkiewicz & Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Andrii Shekhovtsov & Mykhailo Yelmikheiev & Volodymyr Kozlov & Wojciech Sałabun, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Solar Panels with Determination of Local Significance Levels of Criteria Using the MCDM Methods Resistant to the Rank Reversal Phenomenon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Fausto Cavallaro & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antuchevičienė & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2022. "A New Approach to the Viable Ranking of Zero-Carbon Construction Materials with Generalized Fuzzy Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Imad Hassan & Ibrahim Alhamrouni & Nurul Hanis Azhan, 2023. "A CRITIC–TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Solar PV Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Aleksandra Stanković & Milan Andrejić & Vukašin Pajić & Milorad Kilibarda & Dragan Djurdjević, 2023. "A Novel Survey-QFD-WASPAS Methodological Approach for Designing Crowd Storage Platforms: A Case Study of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-32, May.
    9. Jaros{l}aw Wk{a}tr'obski & Aleksandra Bk{a}czkiewicz & Iga Rudawska, 2023. "A Strong Sustainability Paradigm Based Analytical Hierarchy Process (SSP-AHP) Method to Evaluate Sustainable Healthcare Systems," Papers 2306.00718, arXiv.org.
    10. Pınar Miç & Z. Figen Antmen, 2021. "A Decision-Making Model Based on TOPSIS, WASPAS, and MULTIMOORA Methods for University Location Selection Problem," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    11. Krishankumar, Raghunathan & Pamucar, Dragan & Deveci, Muhammat & Aggarwal, Manish & Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian, 2022. "Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities’ demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1428-1442.
    12. Roman Vavrek, 2021. "An Analysis of Usage of a Multi-Criteria Approach in an Athlete Evaluation: An Evidence of NHL Attackers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Assoc. Prof. Dina Çakmur Yildirtan & Esengül Salihoğlu, 2017. "Panel Data Analysis of Exchange Rate for Fragile Five," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May Augus.
    2. Wei, Jing & Zhang, Jianjun & Wu, Xia & Song, Zeyu, 2022. "Governance in mining enterprises: An effective way to promote the intensification of resources—Taking coal resources as an example," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Mehmet Islamoglu & Mehmet Apan & Ahmet Oztel, 2015. "An Evaluation of the Financial Performance of REITs in Borsa Istanbul: A Case Study Using the Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 124-138, April.
    4. Kumaran, Sunitha, 2022. "Financial performance index of IPO firms using VIKOR-CRITIC techniques," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    5. Onur Selcuk & Hatice Karakas & Beykan Cizel & Emre Ipekci Cetin, 2023. "How does tourism affect protected areas?: A multi-criteria decision making application in UNESCO natural heritage sites," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1923-1944, June.
    6. Leilei Jiao & Fumin Deng & Xuedong Liang, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization Synergy Degree Measures—A Case Study in Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ahmed Imran Hunjra & Hasnain Mehmood & Haroon Bakari, 2018. "Co-Movement between Macroeconomic Variables and Capital Flight," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(9), pages 1185-1195, September.
    8. Taufiq Hidayat, 2016. "The Impact of Financial Conglomeration on Risk and Return Performance in Indonesia Banking Industry," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 6(2), pages 1135-1135.
    9. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Audrius Čereška & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ina Tetsman & Irina Grinbergienė, 2016. "Sustainable Assessment of Aerosol Pollution Decrease Applying Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, June.
    11. Zydrune Morkunaite & Romualdas Bausys & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Contractor Selection for Sgraffito Decoration of Cultural Heritage Buildings Using the WASPAS-SVNS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    12. Kuei-Hu Chang, 2022. "A novel reliability calculation method under neutrosophic environments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1599-1615, August.
    13. Leonardo Sierra & Felipe Araya & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Consideration of Uncertainty and Multiple Disciplines in the Determination of Sustainable Criteria for Rural Roads Using Neutrosophic Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Dragan Pamučar & Ibrahim Badi & Korica Sanja & Radojko Obradović, 2018. "A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Changxing Fan & Jun Ye & Sheng Feng & En Fan & Keli Hu, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Using Heronian Mean Operators under a Bipolar Neutrosophic Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Maryam Kiani Sadr & Roghayeh Parchianloo & Sedighe Abdollahi & Hamta Golkarian, 2023. "Application of weighted aggregated sum product assessment and geographical information system for urban development zoning," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 845-863, September.
    17. Xiaoling Wang & Hongling Yu & Peng Lv & Cheng Wang & Jun Zhang & Jia Yu, 2019. "Seepage Safety Assessment of Concrete Gravity Dam Based on Matter-Element Extension Model and FDA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Paolo Rosasco & Leopoldo Sdino, 2023. "The Social Sustainability of the Infrastructures: A Case Study in the Liguria Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Bakır Mahmut & Akan Şahap & Durmaz Emrah, 2019. "Exploring service quality of low-cost airlines in Europe: An integrated MCDM approach," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 109-130, June.
    20. Eglė Klumbytė & Raimondas Bliūdžius & Milena Medineckienė & Paris A. Fokaides, 2021. "An MCDM Model for Sustainable Decision-Making in Municipal Residential Buildings Facilities Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00371-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.