IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i12p4485-d843098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas within Legacy Power Generation Facilities

Author

Listed:
  • German Dominguez-Gonzalez

    (E.T.S.I.I., University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain)

  • Jose Ignacio Muñoz-Hernandez

    (E.T.S.I.I., University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Spain)

  • Derek Bunn

    (London Business School, Sussex Place, Regent’s Park, London NW1 5SA, UK)

  • Carlos Jesus Garcia-Checa

    (E.T.S.I.I., University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Spain)

Abstract

Whilst various new technologies for power generation are continuously being evaluated, the owners of almost-new facilities, such as combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants, remain motivated to adapt these to new circumstances and avoid the balance-sheet financial impairments of underutilization. Not only are the owners reluctant to decommission the legacy CCGT assets, but system operators value the inertia and flexibilities they contribute to a system becoming predominated with renewable generation. This analysis therefore focuses on the reinvestment cases for adapting CCGT to hydrogen (H 2 ), synthetic natural gas (SNG) and/or retrofitted carbon capture and utilization systems (CCUS). Although H 2 , either by itself or as part of SNG, has been evaluated attractively for longer-term electricity storage, the business case for how it can be part of a hybrid legacy CCGT system has not been analyzed in a market context. This work compares the power to synthetic natural gas to power (PSNGP) adaptation with the simpler and less expensive power to hydrogen to power (P2HP) adaptation. Both the P2HP and PSNGP configurations are effective in terms of decarbonizations. The best results of the feasibility analysis for a UK application with low CCGT load factors (around 31%) were obtained for 100% H 2 (P2HP) in the lower range of wholesale electricity prices (less than 178 GBP/MWh), but in the higher range of prices, it would be preferable to use the PSNGP configuration with a low proportion of SNG (25%). If the CCGT load factor increased to 55% (the medium scenario), the breakeven profitability point between P2HP and PSNGP decreased to a market price of 145 GBP/MWh. Alternatively, with the higher load factors (above 77%), satisfactory results were obtained for PSNGP using 50% SNG if with market prices above 185 GBP/MWh.

Suggested Citation

  • German Dominguez-Gonzalez & Jose Ignacio Muñoz-Hernandez & Derek Bunn & Carlos Jesus Garcia-Checa, 2022. "Integration of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas within Legacy Power Generation Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4485-:d:843098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4485/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4485/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guandalini, Giulio & Campanari, Stefano & Romano, Matteo C., 2015. "Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-130.
    2. Devinder Mahajan & Kun Tan & T. Venkatesh & Pradheep Kileti & Clive R. Clayton, 2022. "Hydrogen Blending in Gas Pipeline Networks—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Özdemir, Özge & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & van Hout, Marit & Koutstaal, Paul R., 2020. "Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Azadeh Maroufmashat & Michael Fowler, 2017. "Transition of Future Energy System Infrastructure; through Power-to-Gas Pathways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Kristóf Kummer & Attila R. Imre, 2021. "Seasonal and Multi-Seasonal Energy Storage by Power-to-Methane Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Martins, Jason & Miles, John, 2021. "A techno-economic assessment of battery business models in the UK electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    8. Böhm, Hans & Zauner, Andreas & Rosenfeld, Daniel C. & Tichler, Robert, 2020. "Projecting cost development for future large-scale power-to-gas implementations by scaling effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    9. Cesaro, Zac & Ives, Matthew & Nayak-Luke, Richard & Mason, Mike & Bañares-Alcántara, René, 2021. "Ammonia to power: Forecasting the levelized cost of electricity from green ammonia in large-scale power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    10. Bassano, Claudia & Deiana, Paolo & Vilardi, Giorgio & Verdone, Nicola, 2020. "Modeling and economic evaluation of carbon capture and storage technologies integrated into synthetic natural gas and power-to-gas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    11. Cárdenas, Bruno & Swinfen-Styles, Lawrie & Rouse, James & Hoskin, Adam & Xu, Weiqing & Garvey, S.D., 2021. "Energy storage capacity vs. renewable penetration: A study for the UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 849-867.
    12. Yifei Lu & Thiemo Pesch & Andrea Benigni, 2021. "Simulation of Coupled Power and Gas Systems with Hydrogen-Enriched Natural Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rishabh Agarwal, 2022. "Economic Analysis of Renewable Power-to-Gas in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Domagoj Talapko & Jasminka Talapko & Ivan Erić & Ivana Škrlec, 2023. "Biological Hydrogen Production from Biowaste Using Dark Fermentation, Storage and Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Like & Yao, Erren & Zou, Hansen & Xi, Guang, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a directly solar-driven power-to-methane system by detailed distributed parameter method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    2. Jing Liu & Wei Sun & Jinghao Yan, 2021. "Effect of P2G on Flexibility in Integrated Power-Natural Gas-Heating Energy Systems with Gas Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Boreum & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Projected cost analysis of hybrid methanol production from tri-reforming of methane integrated with various water electrolysis systems: Technical and economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Uchman, Wojciech & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Jurczyk, Michał & Węcel, Daniel, 2020. "The analysis of dynamic operation of power-to-SNG system with hydrogen generator powered with renewable energy, hydrogen storage and methanation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Rishabh Agarwal, 2022. "Economic Analysis of Renewable Power-to-Gas in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Landon, Robert Stephen & Kim, Jeongdong & Liu, Yi & Moon, Il, 2022. "Continuous and flexible Renewable-Power-to-Methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: Revisiting the techno-economic potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Choe, Changgwon & Cheon, Seunghyun & Kim, Heehyang & Lim, Hankwon, 2023. "Mitigating climate change for negative CO2 emission via syngas methanation: Techno-economic and life-cycle assessments of renewable methane production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Jing Liu & Wei Sun & Gareth P. Harrison, 2019. "Optimal Low-Carbon Economic Environmental Dispatch of Hybrid Electricity-Natural Gas Energy Systems Considering P2G," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Gábor Pörzse & Zoltán Csedő & Máté Zavarkó, 2021. "Disruption Potential Assessment of the Power-to-Methane Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Bucksteeg, Michael & Mikurda, Jennifer & Weber, Christoph, 2023. "Integration of power-to-gas into electricity markets during the ramp-up phase—Assessing the role of carbon pricing," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Máté Zavarkó & Attila R. Imre & Gábor Pörzse & Zoltán Csedő, 2021. "Past, Present and Near Future: An Overview of Closed, Running and Planned Biomethanation Facilities in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    12. Salomone, Fabio & Marocco, Paolo & Ferrario, Daniele & Lanzini, Andrea & Fino, Debora & Bensaid, Samir & Santarelli, Massimo, 2023. "Process simulation and energy analysis of synthetic natural gas production from water electrolysis and CO2 capture in a waste incinerator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    13. Dong, Haiyan & Fu, Yanbo & Jia, Qingquan & Zhang, Tie & Meng, Dequn, 2023. "Low carbon optimization of integrated energy microgrid based on life cycle analysis method and multi time scale energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 60-71.
    14. Ikäheimo, Jussi & Lindroos, Tomi J. & Kiviluoma, Juha, 2023. "Impact of climate and geological storage potential on feasibility of hydrogen fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    15. Libo Zhang & Qian Du & Dequn Zhou, 2021. "Grid Parity Analysis of China’s Centralized Photovoltaic Generation under Multiple Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Frank, Jonas & Dettelbacher, Johannes & Ludwig, Ralf & Karl, Jürgen & Dillig, Marius, 2021. "Scenarios for the integration of renewable gases into the German natural gas market – A simulation-based optimisation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    17. Lim, Juin Yau & Safder, Usman & How, Bing Shen & Ifaei, Pouya & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2021. "Nationwide sustainable renewable energy and Power-to-X deployment planning in South Korea assisted with forecasting model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    18. Wang, Xiaolin & Zhang, Fengyuan & Lipiński, Wojciech, 2020. "Research progress and challenges in hydrate-based carbon dioxide capture applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    19. Ives, Matthew & Cesaro, Zac & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Bañares-Alcántara, René, 2023. "Facilitating deep decarbonization via sector coupling of green hydrogen and ammonia," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    20. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4485-:d:843098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.