IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16882-d1005145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Analysis of Renewable Power-to-Gas in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Rishabh Agarwal

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

Abstract

The steep reduction in costs of electrolysis and methanation has made renewable power-to-gas much more affordable. Reeling from an energy crisis, Europe could use this technology for near-shoring production of clean and reliable synthetic natural gas (SNG) and end dependence on Russian gas. This article investigates the economic feasibility of producing SNG in Norway, which has amongst the cleanest and cheapest electricity production in Europe. It is found that SNG can be produced for 141 €/MWh at a 10 MW electrolyzer facility in 2023; and for 108 €/MWh at a larger 100 MW electrolyzer facility in 2030. The relevance of these prices is discussed in the context of the current and future European gas markets, and recommendations are made to reduce the production costs even further.

Suggested Citation

  • Rishabh Agarwal, 2022. "Economic Analysis of Renewable Power-to-Gas in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16882-:d:1005145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jåstad, Eirik Ogner & Trotter, Ian M. & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2022. "Long term power prices and renewable energy market values in Norway – A probabilistic approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. German Dominguez-Gonzalez & Jose Ignacio Muñoz-Hernandez & Derek Bunn & Carlos Jesus Garcia-Checa, 2022. "Integration of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas within Legacy Power Generation Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Rishabh Agarwal, 2022. "Transition to a Hydrogen-Based Economy: Possibilities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Wenyin Jiang & Songqing Zhao & Tianfang Yang, 2022. "Economic and Technical Analysis of Power to Gas Factory Taking Karamay as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Böhm, Hans & Zauner, Andreas & Rosenfeld, Daniel C. & Tichler, Robert, 2020. "Projecting cost development for future large-scale power-to-gas implementations by scaling effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Gorre, Jachin & Ruoss, Fabian & Karjunen, Hannu & Schaffert, Johannes & Tynjälä, Tero, 2020. "Cost benefits of optimizing hydrogen storage and methanation capacities for Power-to-Gas plants in dynamic operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    7. van Leeuwen, Charlotte & Mulder, Machiel, 2018. "Power-to-gas in electricity markets dominated by renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 258-272.
    8. Frank, Elimar & Gorre, Jachin & Ruoss, Fabian & Friedl, Markus J., 2018. "Calculation and analysis of efficiencies and annual performances of Power-to-Gas systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 217-231.
    9. Gorre, Jachin & Ortloff, Felix & van Leeuwen, Charlotte, 2019. "Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized Power-to-Gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Azadeh Maroufmashat & Michael Fowler, 2017. "Transition of Future Energy System Infrastructure; through Power-to-Gas Pathways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Thema, M. & Bauer, F. & Sterner, M., 2019. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 775-787.
    12. Ryan Wiser & Joseph Rand & Joachim Seel & Philipp Beiter & Erin Baker & Eric Lantz & Patrick Gilman, 2021. "Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 555-565, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Landon, Robert Stephen & Kim, Jeongdong & Liu, Yi & Moon, Il, 2022. "Continuous and flexible Renewable-Power-to-Methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: Revisiting the techno-economic potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Corey Duncan & Robin Roche & Samir Jemei & Marie-Cécile Péra, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Post-Print hal-03692975, HAL.
    3. Salomone, Fabio & Marocco, Paolo & Ferrario, Daniele & Lanzini, Andrea & Fino, Debora & Bensaid, Samir & Santarelli, Massimo, 2023. "Process simulation and energy analysis of synthetic natural gas production from water electrolysis and CO2 capture in a waste incinerator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    4. Maeder, Mattia & Weiss, Olga & Boulouchos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Assessing the need for flexibility technologies in decarbonized power systems: A new model applied to Central Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    5. Duncan, Corey & Roche, Robin & Jemei, Samir & Pera, Marie-Cécile, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    6. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    7. Lee, Ju-Sung & Cherif, Ali & Yoon, Ha-Jun & Seo, Seung-Kwon & Bae, Ju-Eon & Shin, Ho-Jin & Lee, Chulgu & Kwon, Hweeung & Lee, Chul-Jin, 2022. "Large-scale overseas transportation of hydrogen: Comparative techno-economic and environmental investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Johannes Dock & Stefan Wallner & Anna Traupmann & Thomas Kienberger, 2022. "Provision of Demand-Side Flexibility through the Integration of Power-to-Gas Technologies in an Electric Steel Mill," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Janke, Leandro & McDonagh, Shane & Weinrich, Sören & Murphy, Jerry & Nilsson, Daniel & Hansson, Per-Anders & Nordberg, Åke, 2020. "Optimizing power-to-H2 participation in the Nord Pool electricity market: Effects of different bidding strategies on plant operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 820-836.
    10. Ghafoori, Mohammad Samim & Loubar, Khaled & Marin-Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand, 2022. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of biomethane production via landfill biogas upgrading and power-to-gas technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Greiml, Matthias & Fritz, Florian & Kienberger, Thomas, 2021. "Increasing installable photovoltaic power by implementing power-to-gas as electricity grid relief – A techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Qi, Meng & Vo, Dat Nguyen & Yu, Haoshui & Shu, Chi-Min & Cui, Chengtian & Liu, Yi & Park, Jinwoo & Moon, Il, 2023. "Strategies for flexible operation of power-to-X processes coupled with renewables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Wu, Di & Wang, Dexin & Ramachandran, Thiagarajan & Holladay, Jamie, 2022. "A techno-economic assessment framework for hydrogen energy storage toward multiple energy delivery pathways and grid services," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    14. Johannes Schaffert & Hans Christian Gils & Max Fette & Hedda Gardian & Christine Brandstätt & Thomas Pregger & Nils Brücken & Eren Tali & Marc Fiebrandt & Rolf Albus & Frank Burmeister, 2022. "Integrating System and Operator Perspectives for the Evaluation of Power-to-Gas Plants in the Future German Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Lim, Juin Yau & Safder, Usman & How, Bing Shen & Ifaei, Pouya & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2021. "Nationwide sustainable renewable energy and Power-to-X deployment planning in South Korea assisted with forecasting model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    16. Fambri, Gabriele & Diaz-Londono, Cesar & Mazza, Andrea & Badami, Marco & Sihvonen, Teemu & Weiss, Robert, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of Power-to-Gas plants in a gas and electricity distribution network system with high renewable energy penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    17. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    18. Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Boreum & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Projected cost analysis of hybrid methanol production from tri-reforming of methane integrated with various water electrolysis systems: Technical and economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    19. David Borge-Diez & Enrique Rosales-Asensio & Emin Açıkkalp & Daniel Alonso-Martínez, 2023. "Analysis of Power to Gas Technologies for Energy Intensive Industries in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Lena Maria Ringsgwandl & Johannes Schaffert & Nils Brücken & Rolf Albus & Klaus Görner, 2022. "Current Legislative Framework for Green Hydrogen Production by Electrolysis Plants in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16882-:d:1005145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.