IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6290-d648838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endogenous Approach of a Frequency-Constrained Unit Commitment in Islanded Microgrid Systems

Author

Listed:
  • David Rebollal

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M), Avda. De la Universidad 30, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain)

  • Mónica Chinchilla

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M), Avda. De la Universidad 30, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain)

  • David Santos-Martín

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M), Avda. De la Universidad 30, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain)

  • Josep M. Guerrero

    (Center for Research on Microgrids (CROM), AAU Energy, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark)

Abstract

Power reserves are usually scheduled in day-ahead unit commitment (UC) to minimize operating costs while maintaining system security. In applying basic UC (bUC) after a contingency, the system frequency may fall upon the activation of the load-shedding global control (under-frequency load-shedding or UFLS) limits. Small isolated microgrids are more sensitive to this issue due to their lack of inertia. Including dynamic considerations into the bUC problem can minimize UFLS activation and also avoid the need for the operator to later check the short-term feasibility of a bUC solution. These proposals are known as Frequency-Constrained UC (FCUC), although the implementation are very time-consuming. FCUC implementation will increase the system’s operational costs, which should be calculated to estimate remuneration to the safety service based on the additional reserve provision. The electrical system of Gran Canaria island has suffered several episodes of greater blackouts in recent years. Shortly, there will be 242 MW of wind generation installed (26% of the thermal power installed on Gran Canaria). The main objective of this work is to improve the island system reliability by means of an FCUC formulation applied by the system operator in practice, including renewable sources. The results show that the frequency values remained within the admissible boundaries, but the system’s operational costs increased by around 13%.

Suggested Citation

  • David Rebollal & Mónica Chinchilla & David Santos-Martín & Josep M. Guerrero, 2021. "Endogenous Approach of a Frequency-Constrained Unit Commitment in Islanded Microgrid Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6290-:d:648838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Ackooij & I. Danti Lopez & A. Frangioni & F. Lacalandra & M. Tahanan, 2018. "Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty: an updated literature survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 11-85, December.
    2. Badesa, L. & Teng, F. & Strbac, G., 2020. "Pricing inertia and Frequency Response with diverse dynamics in a Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming formulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olukorede Tijani Adenuga & Senthil Krishnamurthy, 2023. "Economic Power Dispatch of a Grid-Tied Photovoltaic-Based Energy Management System: Co-Optimization Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    2. Abdi, Hamdi, 2021. "Profit-based unit commitment problem: A review of models, methods, challenges, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Bismark Singh & Bernard Knueven & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "Modeling flexible generator operating regions via chance-constrained stochastic unit commitment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 309-326, June.
    4. Ruilin Pan & Qiong Wang & Zhenghong Li & Jianhua Cao & Yongjin Zhang, 2022. "Steelmaking-continuous casting scheduling problem with multi-position refining furnaces under time-of-use tariffs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 119-151, March.
    5. Fang, Xin & Cui, Hantao & Du, Ershun & Li, Fangxing & Kang, Chongqing, 2021. "Characteristics of locational uncertainty marginal price for correlated uncertainties of variable renewable generation and demands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    6. Cristian Camilo Marín-Cano & Juan Esteban Sierra-Aguilar & Jesús M. López-Lezama & Álvaro Jaramillo-Duque & Juan G. Villegas, 2020. "A Novel Strategy to Reduce Computational Burden of the Stochastic Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Wim Ackooij & Pedro Pérez-Aros, 2020. "Gradient Formulae for Nonlinear Probabilistic Constraints with Non-convex Quadratic Forms," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 239-269, April.
    8. Suradej Duangpummet & Jessada Karnjana & Waree Kongprawechnon, 2021. "State-of-charge estimation based on theory of evidence and interval analysis with differential evolution optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 399-414, May.
    9. Alexia Marchand & Michel Gendreau & Marko Blais & Jonathan Guidi, 2019. "Optimized operating rules for short-term hydropower planning in a stochastic environment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-519, July.
    10. van Ackooij, Wim & De Boeck, Jérôme & Detienne, Boris & Pan, Stefania & Poss, Michael, 2018. "Optimizing power generation in the presence of micro-grids," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 450-461.
    11. Wim Ackooij & Debora Daniela Escobar & Martin Glanzer & Georg Ch. Pflug, 2020. "Distributionally robust optimization with multiple time scales: valuation of a thermal power plant," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 357-385, October.
    12. Schäffer, Linn Emelie & Helseth, Arild & Korpås, Magnus, 2022. "A stochastic dynamic programming model for hydropower scheduling with state-dependent maximum discharge constraints," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 571-581.
    13. Mínguez, R. & van Ackooij, W. & García-Bertrand, R., 2021. "Constraint generation for risk averse two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 194-206.
    14. Basu, Mousumi, 2023. "Fuel constrained commitment scheduling for combined heat and power dispatch incorporating electric vehicle parking lot," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Motta, Vinicius N. & Anjos, Miguel F. & Gendreau, Michel, 2024. "Survey of optimization models for power system operation and expansion planning with demand response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 401-412.
    16. Sunkyo Kim & Pyeong-Ik Hwang & Jaewan Suh, 2023. "Automatic Generation Control Ancillary Service Cost-Allocation Methods Based on Causer-Pays Principle in Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Rasku, Topi & Miettinen, Jari & Rinne, Erkka & Kiviluoma, Juha, 2020. "Impact of 15-day energy forecasts on the hydro-thermal scheduling of a future Nordic power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Angelina D. Bintoudi & Lampros Zyglakis & Apostolos C. Tsolakis & Paschalis A. Gkaidatzis & Athanasios Tryferidis & Dimosthenis Ioannidis & Dimitrios Tzovaras, 2021. "OptiMEMS: An Adaptive Lightweight Optimal Microgrid Energy Management System Based on the Novel Virtual Distributed Energy Resources in Real-Life Demonstration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6290-:d:648838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.