IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v361y2024ics030626192400312x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market design for ancillary service provisions of inertia and frequency response via virtual power plants: A non-convex bi-level optimisation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Qiu, Dawei
  • Baig, Aimon Mirza
  • Wang, Yi
  • Wang, Lingling
  • Jiang, Chuanwen
  • Strbac, Goran

Abstract

The Great Britain (GB) government is paving the path to decarbonisation by actively promoting the integration of wind power into its generation mix. This sharp transition to renewable energy, however, introduces specific challenges. The characteristics of non-synchronous wind turbines have the potential to impact grid stability and frequency security due to the reduction in system inertia. In response to these challenges, the deployment of virtual power plants (VPPs) is envisioned in deregulated power systems, which allow for the aggregation and coordinated control of diverse distributed energy resources, enhancing grid flexibility, reliability, and efficiency. Moreover, VPPs offer the provision of system inertia and frequency response services at the national level. This study drops this assumption and leverages the localised flexibility inherent in VPPs to meet the ancillary service requirements of the low-carbon power system. The formulated problem is constructed as a non-convex bi-level optimisation problem, where the upper-level problem represents the operation of a frequency-constrained unit commitment model, and the lower-level problem embodies the energy dispatches and frequency responses of a group of VPPs, guided by the dual price signals of cleared energy and ancillary services. To address the non-convex nature of the unit commitment problem, a two-fold approach is employed. First, binary commitment status decision variables are relaxed to continuous versions. Subsequently, the duality gap between the original non-convex unit commitment problem and its relaxed dual form is minimised, yielding a solution closely approximating the optimal solution of the original problem. Second, the relaxed bi-level optimisation problem is transformed into a single-level mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints by replacing the lower-level VPP problems with their equivalent Karush-Kuhn–Tucker optimality conditions. The case studies conducted in this work encompass a comprehensive scope. Initially, the study evaluates the effectiveness of VPPs in delivering ancillary services within the projected context of the GB power system for 2030. The findings reveal a substantial 28.28% decrease in system operation costs when compared to the benchmark case lacking VPP flexibility. Additionally, the integration of VPPs leads to significantly lower price signals for inertia, primary frequency response, and enhanced frequency response, reduced by 81.21%, 79.13%, and 86.27%, respectively, in contrast to the benchmark case. The analysis then delves into a sensitivity exploration, investigating the inherent flexibility of VPPs. The profit of local VPPs is expected to increase with VPP flexibility. Finally, the study illustrates how VPPs can adapt to and derive benefits from an increasing level of wind power penetration by providing a higher amount of frequency response.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiu, Dawei & Baig, Aimon Mirza & Wang, Yi & Wang, Lingling & Jiang, Chuanwen & Strbac, Goran, 2024. "Market design for ancillary service provisions of inertia and frequency response via virtual power plants: A non-convex bi-level optimisation approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s030626192400312x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192400312X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s030626192400312x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.