IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v95y2025ics0957178725000530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frequency stability services to compensate for low inertia in renewable-dominated power systems

Author

Listed:
  • Bindu, Shilpa
  • Sigrist, Lukas
  • Chaves Ávila, José Pablo

Abstract

The shift towards non-synchronous generation reduces system inertia, creating operational challenges in power systems worldwide. This inertia challenge depends on the synchronous grid size, generation mix, and the existing portfolio of services procured by the system operators. This study examines how five European countries from different synchronous areas address these challenges, focusing on the market-based procurement of inertia-related services. We provide a theoretical background on why stability service markets are challenging to design due to the interplay between different services and their costs. Further, we use a theoretical market framework to analyze the market design elements and to see how aligned they are with the evolving needs of the power system. Our findings stress the importance of investment incentives for low-carbon technologies and proactive market designs to meet evolving stability needs, offering guidance for power systems integrating a high share of renewables.

Suggested Citation

  • Bindu, Shilpa & Sigrist, Lukas & Chaves Ávila, José Pablo, 2025. "Frequency stability services to compensate for low inertia in renewable-dominated power systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:95:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000530
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000530
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:95:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.