IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comgts/v17y2020i2d10.1007_s10287-020-00368-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling flexible generator operating regions via chance-constrained stochastic unit commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Bismark Singh

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Bernard Knueven

    (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

  • Jean-Paul Watson

    (Global Security Directorate Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

Abstract

We introduce a novel chance-constrained stochastic unit commitment model to address uncertainty in renewables’ production in operations of power systems. For most thermal generators, underlying technical constraints that are universally treated as “hard” by deterministic unit commitment models are in fact based on engineering judgments, such that system operators can periodically request operation outside these limits in non-nominal situations, e.g., to ensure reliability. We incorporate this practical consideration into a chance-constrained stochastic unit commitment model, specifically by infrequently allowing minor deviations from the minimum and maximum thermal generator power output levels. We demonstrate that an extensive form of our model is computationally tractable for medium-sized power systems given modest numbers of scenarios for renewables’ production. We show that the model is able to potentially save significant annual production costs by allowing infrequent and controlled violation of the traditionally hard bounds imposed on thermal generator production limits. Finally, we conduct a sensitivity analysis of optimal solutions to our model under two restricted regimes and observe similar qualitative results.

Suggested Citation

  • Bismark Singh & Bernard Knueven & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "Modeling flexible generator operating regions via chance-constrained stochastic unit commitment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 309-326, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:17:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10287-020-00368-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10287-020-00368-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10287-020-00368-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10287-020-00368-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bismark Singh & David P. Morton & Surya Santoso, 2018. "An adaptive model with joint chance constraints for a hybrid wind-conventional generator system," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 563-582, October.
    2. Maurice QUEYRANNE & Laurence A. WOLSEY, 2017. "Tight MIP formulations for bounded up/down times and interval-dependent start-ups," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2876, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. W. Ackooij & I. Danti Lopez & A. Frangioni & F. Lacalandra & M. Tahanan, 2018. "Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty: an updated literature survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 11-85, December.
    4. Jean-Paul Watson & Roger J-B Wets & David L. Woodruff, 2010. "Scalable Heuristics for a Class of Chance-Constrained Stochastic Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 543-554, November.
    5. Samer Takriti & Benedikt Krasenbrink & Lilian S.-Y. Wu, 2000. "Incorporating Fuel Constraints and Electricity Spot Prices into the Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 268-280, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Pan & Ming Zhao & Chung-Lun Li & Feng Qiu, 2022. "A Polyhedral Study on Fuel-Constrained Unit Commitment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3309-3324, November.
    2. Bernard Knueven & James Ostrowski & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "On Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 857-876, October.
    3. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    4. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    5. Nogata, Daisuke, 2022. "Determinants of household switching between natural gas suppliers: Evidence from Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Matt Thompson, 2013. "Optimal Economic Dispatch and Risk Management of Thermal Power Plants in Deregulated Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 791-809, August.
    7. Kjetil Haugen & Stein Wallace, 2006. "Stochastic programming: Potential hazards when random variables reflect market interaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 119-127, February.
    8. Jirutitijaroen, Panida & Kim, Sujin & Kittithreerapronchai, Oran & Prina, José, 2013. "An optimization model for natural gas supply portfolios of a power generation company," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-9.
    9. Abdi, Hamdi, 2021. "Profit-based unit commitment problem: A review of models, methods, challenges, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Post-Print hal-03350191, HAL.
    11. Nicolas Dupin, 2017. "Tighter MIP formulations for the discretised unit commitment problem with min-stop ramping constraints," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 149-176, March.
    12. Shanshan Wang & Jinlin Li & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2021. "Chance-Constrained Multiple Bin Packing Problem with an Application to Operating Room Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1661-1677, October.
    13. Pascale Bendotti & Pierre Fouilhoux & Cécile Rottner, 2018. "The min-up/min-down unit commitment polytope," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1024-1058, October.
    14. Kathryn M. Schumacher & Richard Li‐Yang Chen & Amy E.M. Cohn & Jeremy Castaing, 2016. "Algorithm to solve a chance‐constrained network capacity design problem with stochastic demands and finite support," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(3), pages 236-246, April.
    15. Heuberger, Clara F. & Bains, Praveen K. & Mac Dowell, Niall, 2020. "The EV-olution of the power system: A spatio-temporal optimisation model to investigate the impact of electric vehicle deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    16. Jianqiu Huang & Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2021. "Multistage Stochastic Power Generation Scheduling Co-Optimizing Energy and Ancillary Services," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 352-369, January.
    17. Tomas Lidén, 2020. "Coordinating maintenance windows and train traffic: a case study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 261-298, June.
    18. Ruilin Pan & Qiong Wang & Zhenghong Li & Jianhua Cao & Yongjin Zhang, 2022. "Steelmaking-continuous casting scheduling problem with multi-position refining furnaces under time-of-use tariffs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 119-151, March.
    19. Yan Deng & Huiwen Jia & Shabbir Ahmed & Jon Lee & Siqian Shen, 2021. "Scenario Grouping and Decomposition Algorithms for Chance-Constrained Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 757-773, May.
    20. Jorge Valenzuela & Mainak Mazumdar, 2003. "Commitment of Electric Power Generators Under Stochastic Market Prices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 880-893, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:17:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10287-020-00368-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.