IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6280-d648692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Factorial Review of Repowering Wind Generation Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel C. Gil-García

    (Faculty of Engineering, Distance University of Madrid (UDIMA), c/Coruña, km 38500, 28400 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ana Fernández-Guillamón

    (Department of Automatics, Electrical Engineering and Electronic Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain)

  • M. Socorro García-Cascales

    (Department of Electronics, Technology of Computers and Projects, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Angel Molina-García

    (Department of Automatics, Electrical Engineering and Electronic Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain)

Abstract

The integration of renewables into power systems is a key transformation for mitigating climate change and reducing fossil-fuel dependence. Among the different resources, wind participation has become crucial in recent decades—both onshore and offshore wind power plants. However, assuming the useful life of the wind turbines at approximately 20 years, different solutions should be discussed to overcome the turbine’s aging problem. In the coming years, some countries within the wind sector will face the decision of partially or totally repowering or dismantling their turbines. This paper reviews different repowering strategies and contributions from a multifactorial perspective. A set of categories is defined by the authors and those multifactorial parameters are then classified according to such categories: technical, economic, environmental, social, and political. From each category, the most relevant factors to be considered for repowering decision-making purposes are identified and discussed. According to the specific literature, more than 90% of the reviewed contributions are focused on onshore wind power plant repowering actions. This percentage is in line with onshore and offshore wind generation units installed in recent decades. The reviewed studies show that Germany has a major number of contributions. Regarding offshore repowering strategies, all contributions propose a multifactorial analysis, in contrast to onshore repowering strategies where only 68% of the authors carry out a multifactorial analysis. The revised repowering methodologies and the categorization of factors can also be used by the repowering market, as a useful tool in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel C. Gil-García & Ana Fernández-Guillamón & M. Socorro García-Cascales & Angel Molina-García, 2021. "A Multi-Factorial Review of Repowering Wind Generation Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6280-:d:648692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6280/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6280/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Njiri, Jackson G. & Beganovic, Nejra & Do, Manh H. & Söffker, Dirk, 2019. "Consideration of lifetime and fatigue load in wind turbine control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 818-828.
    2. Yuehong Lu & Zafar A. Khan & Manuel S. Alvarez-Alvarado & Yang Zhang & Zhijia Huang & Muhammad Imran, 2020. "A Critical Review of Sustainable Energy Policies for the Promotion of Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2020. "GoWInD: Wind Energy Spatiotemporal Assessment and Characterization of End-of-Life Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Manchado, Cristina & Gomez-Jauregui, Valentin & Lizcano, Piedad E. & Iglesias, Andres & Galvez, Akemi & Otero, Cesar, 2019. "Wind farm repowering guided by visual impact criteria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 197-207.
    5. Martínez, E. & Latorre-Biel, J.I. & Jiménez, E. & Sanz, F. & Blanco, J., 2018. "Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 260-271.
    6. Madurai Elavarasan, Rajvikram & Pugazhendhi, Rishi & Jamal, Taskin & Dyduch, Joanna & Arif, M.T. & Manoj Kumar, Nallapaneni & Shafiullah, GM & Chopra, Shauhrat S. & Nadarajah, Mithulananthan, 2021. "Envisioning the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the lens of energy sustainability (SDG 7) in the post-COVID-19 world," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Pereira, Sérgio & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A.I.F., 2016. "Optimization modeling to support renewables integration in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 316-325.
    8. Hache, Emmanuel & Palle, Angélique, 2019. "Renewable energy source integration into power networks, research trends and policy implications: A bibliometric and research actors survey analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 23-35.
    9. Yu Hu & Jian Yang & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2020. "Repowering Steel Tubular Wind Turbine Towers Enhancing them by Internal Stiffening Rings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Teresa Romano & Tim Mennel & Sara Scatasta, 2017. "Comparing feed-in tariffs and renewable obligation certificates: the case of repowering wind farms," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(3), pages 291-314, September.
    11. Lena Kitzing & Morten Kofoed Jensen & Thomas Telsnig & Eric Lantz, 2020. "Multifaceted drivers for onshore wind energy repowering and their implications for energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1012-1021, December.
    12. Himpler, Sebastian & Madlener, Reinhard, 2011. "Repowering of Wind Turbines: Economics and Optimal Timing," FCN Working Papers 19/2011, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    13. Ana Fernández-Guillamón & Jorge Villena-Lapaz & Antonio Vigueras-Rodríguez & Tania García-Sánchez & Ángel Molina-García, 2018. "An Adaptive Frequency Strategy for Variable Speed Wind Turbines: Application to High Wind Integration Into Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Hou, Peng & Enevoldsen, Peter & Hu, Weihao & Chen, Cong & Chen, Zhe, 2017. "Offshore wind farm repowering optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 834-844.
    15. Benjamin Pakenham & Anna Ermakova & Ali Mehmanparast, 2021. "A Review of Life Extension Strategies for Offshore Wind Farms Using Techno-Economic Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Clemens Fuchs & Joachim Kasten & Maxi Vent, 2020. "Current State and Future Prospective of Repowering Wind Turbines: An Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Sperling, Karl & Hvelplund, Frede & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2010. "Evaluation of wind power planning in Denmark – Towards an integrated perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5443-5454.
    18. Chris Stetter & Maximilian Heumann & Martin Westbomke & Malte Stonis & Michael H. Breitner, 2020. "A Real Options Approach to Determine the Optimal Choice Between Lifetime Extension and Repowering of Wind Turbines," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Janis S. Neufeld & Udo Buscher & Rainer Lasch & Dominik Möst & Jörn Schönberger (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2019, pages 291-297, Springer.
    19. Szumilas-Kowalczyk, H. & Pevzner, N. & Giedych, R., 2020. "Long-term visual impacts of aging infrastructure: Challenges of decommissioning wind power infrastructure and a survey of alternative strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 550-560.
    20. del Río, Pablo & Calvo Silvosa, Anxo & Iglesias Gómez, Guillermo, 2011. "Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: A qualitative analysis of different options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1897-1908, April.
    21. Reinhard Madlener & Barbara Glensk & Lukas Gläsel, 2019. "Optimal Timing of Onshore Wind Repowering in Germany under Policy Regime Changes: A Real Options Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.
    22. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Campíñez-Romero, Severo & Pérez-Molina, Clara & Mur-Pérez, Francisco, 2015. "Repowering: An actual possibility for wind energy in Spain in a new scenario without feed-in-tariffs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 319-337.
    23. Tambach, Milly & Hasselaar, Evert & Itard, Laure, 2010. "Assessment of current Dutch energy transition policy instruments for the existing housing stock," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 981-996, February.
    24. Syed, Abdul Haseeb & Javed, Adeel & Asim Feroz, Raja M. & Calhoun, Ronald, 2020. "Partial repowering analysis of a wind farm by turbine hub height variation to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference using mesoscale simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    25. Irene Muñoz-Benavente & Anca D. Hansen & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro & Tania García-Sánchez & Ana Fernández-Guillamón & Ángel Molina-García, 2019. "Impact of Combined Demand-Response and Wind Power Plant Participation in Frequency Control for Multi-Area Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    26. Serri, Laura & Lembo, Ettore & Airoldi, Davide & Gelli, Camilla & Beccarello, Massimo, 2018. "Wind energy plants repowering potential in Italy: technical-economic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 382-390.
    27. Wang, Derek D. & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2018. "Climate change mitigation targets set by global firms: Overview and implications for renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 386-398.
    28. Ellabban, Omar & Abu-Rub, Haitham & Blaabjerg, Frede, 2014. "Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 748-764.
    29. Anxo Silvosa & Guillermo Gómez & Pablo Río, 2013. "Analyzing the Techno-Economic Determinants for the Repowering of Wind Farms," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 282-303.
    30. Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Ohl, Cornelia & Hartje, Volkmar, 2010. "Landscape externalities from onshore wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 82-92, January.
    31. Lantz, Eric & Mai, Trieu & Wiser, Ryan H. & Krishnan, Venkat, 2016. "Long-term implications of sustained wind power growth in the United States: Direct electric system impacts and costs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 832-846.
    32. Tafarte, Philip & Das, Subhashree & Eichhorn, Marcus & Thrän, Daniela, 2014. "Small adaptations, big impacts: Options for an optimized mix of variable renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 80-92.
    33. Saint Akadiri, Seyi & Alola, Andrew Adewale & Akadiri, Ada Chigozie & Alola, Uju Violet, 2019. "Renewable energy consumption in EU-28 countries: Policy toward pollution mitigation and economic sustainability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 803-810.
    34. Santos-Alamillos, F.J. & Thomaidis, N.S. & Usaola-García, J. & Ruiz-Arias, J.A. & Pozo-Vázquez, D., 2017. "Exploring the mean-variance portfolio optimization approach for planning wind repowering actions in Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 335-342.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doukas, H. & Arsenopoulos, A. & Lazoglou, M. & Nikas, A. & Flamos, A., 2022. "Wind repowering: Unveiling a hidden asset," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Leite, Gustavo de Novaes Pires & Weschenfelder, Franciele & Farias, João Gabriel de & Kamal Ahmad, Muhammad, 2022. "Economic and sensitivity analysis on wind farm end-of-life strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. de Simón-Martín, Miguel & Ciria-Garcés, Tomás & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & González-Martínez, Alberto, 2022. "Multi-dimensional barrier identification for wind farm repowering in Spain through an expert judgment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2021. "Higher Wind: Highlighted Expansion Opportunities to Repower Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Martínez, E. & Latorre-Biel, J.I. & Jiménez, E. & Sanz, F. & Blanco, J., 2018. "Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 260-271.
    6. Luis M. Abadie & Nestor Goicoechea, 2021. "Old Wind Farm Life Extension vs. Full Repowering: A Review of Economic Issues and a Stochastic Application for Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Anne P. M. Velenturf, 2021. "A Framework and Baseline for the Integration of a Sustainable Circular Economy in Offshore Wind," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-41, September.
    8. de Bona, Jéssica Ceolin & Ferreira, Joao Carlos Espindola & Ordoñez Duran, Julian Fernando, 2021. "Analysis of scenarios for repowering wind farms in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Santos-Alamillos, F.J. & Thomaidis, N.S. & Usaola-García, J. & Ruiz-Arias, J.A. & Pozo-Vázquez, D., 2017. "Exploring the mean-variance portfolio optimization approach for planning wind repowering actions in Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 335-342.
    10. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Syed, Abdul Haseeb & Javed, Adeel & Asim Feroz, Raja M. & Calhoun, Ronald, 2020. "Partial repowering analysis of a wind farm by turbine hub height variation to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference using mesoscale simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Khan, Mehtab Ahmad & Javed, Adeel & Shakir, Sehar & Syed, Abdul Haseeb, 2021. "Optimization of a wind farm by coupled actuator disk and mesoscale models to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference from repowering perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    13. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2020. "GoWInD: Wind Energy Spatiotemporal Assessment and Characterization of End-of-Life Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. McInerney, Celine & Bunn, Derek W., 2017. "Optimal over installation of wind generation facilities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 87-96.
    15. Tafarte, Philip & Lehmann, Paul, 2023. "Quantifying trade-offs for the spatial allocation of onshore wind generation capacity – A case study for Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    16. Tafarte, Philip & Lehmann, Paul, 2021. "Quantifying trade-offs for the spatial allocation of onshore wind generation capacity: A case study for Germany," UFZ Discussion Papers 2/2021, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    17. Cuihui Xia & Tandong Yao & Weicai Wang & Wentao Hu, 2022. "Effect of Climate on Residential Electricity Consumption: A Data-Driven Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Emma L. Delaney & Paul G. Leahy & Jennifer M. McKinley & T. Russell Gentry & Angela J. Nagle & Jeffrey Elberling & Lawrence C. Bank, 2023. "Sustainability Implications of Current Approaches to End-of-Life of Wind Turbine Blades—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Zerrahn, Alexander, 2017. "Wind Power and Externalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 245-260.
    20. Yu, Shiwei & Zhou, Shuangshuang & Zheng, Shuhong & Li, Zhenxi & Liu, Lancui, 2019. "Developing an optimal renewable electricity generation mix for China using a fuzzy multi-objective approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1086-1098.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6280-:d:648692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.