IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i15p4661-d606352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring and Control in Program Management as Effectiveness Drivers in Polish Energy Sector. Diagnosis and Directions of Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Trzeciak

    (Faculty of Organization and Management, The Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Izabela Jonek-Kowalska

    (Faculty of Organization and Management, The Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

The activity of enterprises in the energy sector is complicated by the complexity and capital intensity of the resources and processes used. In the current market conditions, an additional challenge is the implementation of sustainable development, including, in particular, environmental and social goals. These circumstances require efficient and effective management, and this is possible, inter alia, thanks to the use of the project management. However, this approach requires not only implementation, but also professional monitoring and control, which is considered and diagnosed in this article. The purpose of this article is to: (a) verify the programme management areas subject to the monitoring and control process; (b) identify and evaluate the effectiveness of the most frequently used methods in the process of monitoring and control of the programme implementation. A qualitative study using a structured interview was conducted among 21 experts involved in the implementation of programmes from the energy sector. The authors found that energy companies monitor and control programmes in key, but traditional areas such as lead times, costs, risks and benefits. They less often refer to ‘soft’ areas of management, such as: work, communication or quality. In terms of the monitoring and control methodology used, significant discrepancies were found between the methods considered effective and those that are most often used in practice. This requires decisive improvement actions. At the same time, it is worth emphasising that the majority of managers prefer compact and quantifiable forms of monitoring and control, such as: earned value method, Gantt chart and comparing plans to results in individual areas. The sector also lacks a systemic approach to programme management, which should be distinguished from single project management, which is why the authors presented their own approach to solving this problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Trzeciak & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2021. "Monitoring and Control in Program Management as Effectiveness Drivers in Polish Energy Sector. Diagnosis and Directions of Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4661-:d:606352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4661/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4661/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serena Sandri & Hussam Hussein & Nooh Alshyab, 2020. "Sustainability of the Energy Sector in Jordan: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Joyce Fortune & Geoff Peters & Lawson Short, 2015. "Shared understanding during design and delivery: the case of a large-scale information systems program," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 327-338.
    3. Husnain Arshad & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Beenish Bakhtawar & Asheem Shrestha, 2021. "Evaluation of Road Infrastructure Projects: A Life Cycle Sustainability-Based Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Adam Ryszko, 2016. "Proactive Environmental Strategy, Technological Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance—Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Justyna Franc-Dąbrowska & Magdalena Mądra-Sawicka & Anna Milewska, 2021. "Energy Sector Risk and Cost of Capital Assessment—Companies and Investors Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Antonio Miceli & Birgit Hagen & Maria Pia Riccardi & Francesco Sotti & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Verzijlbergh, R.A. & De Vries, L.J. & Dijkema, G.P.J. & Herder, P.M., 2017. "Institutional challenges caused by the integration of renewable energy sources in the European electricity sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 660-667.
    8. Sungjin Ahn & Taehui Kim & Ji-Myong Kim, 2020. "Sustainable Risk Assessment through the Analysis of Financial Losses from Third-Party Damage in Bridge Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Suoniemi, Samppa & Terho, Harri & Zablah, Alex & Olkkonen, Rami & Straub, Detmar W., 2021. "The impact of firm-level and project-level it capabilities on CRM system quality and organizational productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 108-122.
    10. Joya A. Kemper & C. Michael Hall & Paul W. Ballantine, 2019. "Marketing and Sustainability: Business as Usual or Changing Worldviews?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Aisma Linda Kiesnere & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2019. "Sustainability Management in Practice: Organizational Change for Sustainability in Smaller Large-Sized Companies in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-40, January.
    12. Tomasz Kijek & Arkadiusz Kijek & Piotr Bolibok & Anna Matras-Bolibok, 2021. "The Patterns of Energy Innovation Convergence across European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Mariusz Zieliński & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2021. "Does CSR Affect the Profitability and Valuation of Energy Companies? An Example from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Jing Zhang & Fangjian Chen & X.-X. Yuan, 2020. "Comparison of cost and schedule performance of large public projects under P3 and traditional delivery models: a Canadian study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 739-755, August.
    15. Tika Ram Pokharel & Hom Bahadur Rijal, 2021. "Energy Transition toward Cleaner Energy Resources in Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Jie Jian & Yu Guo & Lin Jiang & Yanyan An & Jiafu Su, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Green Supply Chain Considering Environmental Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Wu, Yunna & Luo, Wei & Bian, Qing, 2012. "The research on performance management for new energy project oriented company based on information system in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4370-4378.
    18. Gemünden, Hans Georg & Lehner, Patrick & Kock, Alexander, 2018. "The Project-oriented Organization and its Contribution to Innovation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 92880, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    19. Paul Kerr & Donald R. Noble & Jonathan Hodges & Henry Jeffrey, 2021. "Implementing Radical Innovation in Renewable Energy Experience Curves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    20. Proost, Stef & Van Dender, Kurt, 2012. "Energy and environment challenges in the transport sector," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 77-87.
    21. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko & Marek Szafraniec, 2020. "Greenhouse Gases and Circular Economy Issues in Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-36, November.
    22. Goh, H.H. & Lee, S.W. & Chua, Q.S. & Goh, K.C. & Kok, B.C. & Teo, K.T.K., 2014. "Renewable energy project: Project management, challenges and risk," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 917-932.
    23. Nicholas A. Ashford & Ralph P. Hall, 2011. "The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, January.
    24. Román-Collado, Rocío & Economidou, Marina, 2021. "The role of energy efficiency in assessing the progress towards the EU energy efficiency targets of 2020: Evidence from the European productive sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    25. Elise Dupont & Marc Germain & Hervé Jeanmart, 2021. "Feasibility and Economic Impacts of the Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-34, May.
    26. Borna Dasović & Mario Galić & Uroš Klanšek, 2020. "A Survey on Integration of Optimization and Project Management Tools for Sustainable Construction Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    27. Yongzhong Jiang & Xueli Chen & Vivian Valdmanis & Tomas Baležentis, 2019. "Evaluating Economic and Environmental Performance of the Chinese Industry Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    28. Christophe Midler & Rémi Maniak & Théodore de Campigneulles, 2019. "Ambidextrous Program Management: The Case of Autonomous Mobility," Post-Print hal-02300849, HAL.
    29. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Chen, Jiaqi & Du, Kerui, 2021. "Energy efficiency performance of the industrial sector: From the perspective of technological gap in different regions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    30. Robert Pellerin & Nathalie Perrier, 2019. "A review of methods, techniques and tools for project planning and control," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2160-2178, April.
    31. Stefano Armenia & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Fabio Nonino & Alessandro Pompei, 2019. "Sustainable Project Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    32. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    33. Daniela Colafranceschi & Pere Sala & Fabio Manfredi, 2021. "Nature of the Wind, the Culture of the Landscape: Toward an Energy Sustainability Project in Catalonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radoslaw Miskiewicz, 2022. "Clean and Affordable Energy within Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Governance Digitalization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Ireneusz Górowski & Bartosz Kurek & Marek Szarucki, 2022. "The Impact of a New Accounting Standard on Assets, Liabilities and Leverage of Companies: Evidence from Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Aneta Karasek & Barbara Fura & Magdalena Zajączkowska, 2023. "Assessment of Energy Efficiency in the European Union Countries in 2013 and 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Chu Thi Que & Marina Nevskaya & Oksana Marinina, 2021. "Coal Mines in Vietnam: Geological Conditions and Their Influence on Production Sustainability Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ireneusz Górowski & Bartosz Kurek & Marek Szarucki, 2022. "The Impact of a New Accounting Standard on Assets, Liabilities and Leverage of Companies: Evidence from Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Mateusz Trzeciak, 2021. "Sustainable Risk Management in IT Enterprises," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Meera Al-Marri & Ashly H. Pinnington, 2022. "Managing Sustainability Projects for Social Impact from a Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Márcia R. C. Santos & Ana Rolo & Dulce Matos & Luisa Carvalho, 2023. "The Circular Economy in Corporate Reporting: Text Mining of Energy Companies’ Management Reports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Al-Jabri, Hareb & Das, Probir & Khan, Shoyeb & AbdulQuadir, Mohammad & Thaher, Mehmoud Ibrahim & Hoekman, Kent & Hawari, Alaa H., 2022. "A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    10. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    13. Bu, Yan & Wang, Erda & Möst, Dominik & Lieberwirth, Martin, 2022. "How population migration affects carbon emissions in China: Factual and counterfactual scenario analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2022. "Policy, regulation effectiveness, and sustainability in the energy sector: A worldwide interval-based composite indicator," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Kemp, Alex & Phimister, Euan, 2022. "Energy transition in the UKCS – Modelling the effects of carbon emission charges on upstream petroleum operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. M. Radic & P. Herrmann & P. Haberland & Carla R. Riese, 2022. "Development of a Business Model Resilience Framework for Managers and Strategic Decision-makers," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 575-601, December.
    17. Mohammad Hamsal & Diena Dwidienawati & Mohammad Ichsan & Ahmad Syamil & Bambang Trigunarsyah, 2022. "Multi-Perspective Approach to Building Team Resilience in Project Management—A Case Study in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2023. "Energy footprints and the international trade network: A new dataset. Is the European Union doing it better?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    19. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Xiaosu Ye & Hanyue Qi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    20. N. Thangaiyarkarasi & S. Vanitha, 2021. "The Impact of Financial Development on Decarbonization Factors of Carbon Emissions: A Global Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 353-364.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4661-:d:606352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.