IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i10p2932-d557624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Composition of Syngas Using Rice Husks: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Hung-Ta Wen

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Jau-Huai Lu

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Mai-Xuan Phuc

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to utilize two artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict the syngas composition of a fixed bed updraft gasifier for the gasification of rice husks. Air and steam-air mixtures are the gasifying agents. In the present work, the feeding rate of rice husks is kept constant, while the air and steam flow rates vary in each case. The consideration of various operating conditions provides a clear comparison between air and steam-air gasification. The effects of the reactor temperature, steam-air flow rate, and the ratio of steam to biomass are investigated here. The concentrations of combustible gases such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane in syngas are increased when using the steam-air mixture. Two AI models, namely artificial neural network (ANN) and gradient boosting regression (GBR), are applied to predict the syngas compositions using the experimental data. A total of 74 sets of data are analyzed. The compositions of five gases (CO, CO 2 , H 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 ) are predicted by the ANN and GBR models. The coefficients of determination (R 2 ) range from 0.80 to 0.89 for the ANN model, while the value of R 2 ranges from 0.81 to 0.93 for GBR model. In this study, the GBR model outperforms the ANNs model based on its ensemble technique that uses multiple weak learners. As a result, the GBR model is more convincing in the prediction of syngas composition than the ANN model considered in this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung-Ta Wen & Jau-Huai Lu & Mai-Xuan Phuc, 2021. "Applying Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Composition of Syngas Using Rice Husks: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2932-:d:557624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2932/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2932/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umeki, Kentaro & Namioka, Tomoaki & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2012. "Analysis of an updraft biomass gasifier with high temperature steam using a numerical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 38-45.
    2. Baruah, Dipal & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Modeling of biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 806-815.
    3. Blanco, María Isabel, 2009. "The economics of wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1372-1382, August.
    4. Saeed Esfandi & Simin Baloochzadeh & Mohammad Asayesh & Mehdi Ali Ehyaei & Abolfazl Ahmadi & Amir Arsalan Rabanian & Biplab Das & Vitor A. F. Costa & Afshin Davarpanah, 2020. "Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of a Novel Hybrid System to Produce Electricity, Cooling, and Syngas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Kuprianov, Vladimir I. & Kaewklum, Rachadaporn & Chakritthakul, Songpol, 2011. "Effects of operating conditions and fuel properties on emission performance and combustion efficiency of a swirling fluidized-bed combustor fired with a biomass fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2038-2048.
    6. Henderson, Ross, 2006. "Design, simulation, and testing of a novel hydraulic power take-off system for the Pelamis wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 271-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manish Meena & Hrishikesh Kumar & Nitin Dutt Chaturvedi & Andrey A. Kovalev & Vadim Bolshev & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Aakash Chawade & Manish Singh Rajput & Vivekanand Vivekanand , 2023. "Biomass Gasification and Applied Intelligent Retrieval in Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Hung-Ta Wen & Jau-Huai Lu & Deng-Siang Jhang, 2021. "Features Importance Analysis of Diesel Vehicles’ NO x and CO 2 Emission Predictions in Real Road Driving Based on Gradient Boosting Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Hegazy Rezk & Abdul Ghani Olabi & Enas Taha Sayed & Samah Ibrahim Alshathri & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2023. "Optimized Artificial Intelligent Model to Boost the Efficiency of Saline Wastewater Treatment Based on Hunger Games Search Algorithm and ANFIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferreiro, A.I. & Segurado, R. & Costa, M., 2020. "Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Yu, Hui-Feng & Zhang, Yong-Liang & Zheng, Si-Ming, 2016. "Numerical study on the performance of a wave energy converter with three hinged bodies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1276-1286.
    3. Dina Silva & Eugen Rusu & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2013. "Evaluation of Various Technologies for Wave Energy Conversion in the Portuguese Nearshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    6. Ayman Al-Quraan & Bashar Al-Mhairat, 2022. "Intelligent Optimized Wind Turbine Cost Analysis for Different Wind Sites in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Velo, R. & Osorio, L. & Fernández, M.D. & Rodríguez, M.R., 2014. "An economic analysis of a stand-alone and grid-connected cattle farm," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 883-890.
    8. Silva Herran, Diego & Dai, Hancheng & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Masui, Toshihiko, 2016. "Global assessment of onshore wind power resources considering the distance to urban areas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 75-86.
    9. Kabir, Md Ruhul & Rooke, Braden & Dassanayake, G.D. Malinga & Fleck, Brian A., 2012. "Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 133-141.
    10. Ilyas, Arqam & Kashif, Syed A.R. & Saqib, Muhammad A. & Asad, Muhammad M., 2014. "Wave electrical energy systems: Implementation, challenges and environmental issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 260-268.
    11. Irene Clara Pisón Fernández & Félix Puime Guillén & Miguel Ángel Crespo Cibrán, 2015. "Desarrollo de un modelo de determinación de cash-flows para un proyecto de energía eólica," Economic Analysis Working Papers (2002-2010). Atlantic Review of Economics (2011-2016), Colexio de Economistas de A Coruña, Spain and Fundación Una Galicia Moderna, vol. 1, pages 1-1, June.
    12. Brenda Rojas-Delgado & Monica Alonso & Hortensia Amaris & Juan de Santiago, 2019. "Wave Power Output Smoothing through the Use of a High-Speed Kinetic Buffer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    13. Juliana Subtil Lacerda & Jeroen C. J. M. Van den Bergh, 2014. "International Diffusion of Renewable Energy Innovations: Lessons from the Lead Markets for Wind Power in China, Germany and USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-28, December.
    14. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    16. Adriano Silva Bastos & Tâmara Rita Costa de Souza & Dieimys Santos Ribeiro & Mirian de Lourdes Noronha Motta Melo & Carlos Barreira Martinez, 2023. "Wave Energy Generation in Brazil: A Georeferenced Oscillating Water Column Inventory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Michela Costa & Maurizio La Villetta & Daniele Piazzullo & Domenico Cirillo, 2021. "A Phenomenological Model of a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier Flexible to the Feedstock Composition and the Reactor Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    18. Owen Sedej & Eric Mbonimpa & Trevor Sleight & Jeremy Slagley, 2022. "Application of Machine Learning to Predict the Performance of an EMIPG Reactor Using Data from Numerical Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Jose V. Taboada & Vicente Diaz-Casas & Xi Yu, 2021. "Reliability and Maintenance Management Analysis on OffShore Wind Turbines (OWTs)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2932-:d:557624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.