IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4656-d410213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametric Study of Various Thermodynamic Cycles for the Use of Unconventional Blends

Author

Listed:
  • Odi Fawwaz Alrebei

    (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

  • Philip Bowen

    (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

  • Agustin Valera Medina

    (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

Abstract

This paper aims to conduct a parametric study for five gas turbine cycles (namely, simple, heat exchanged, free turbine and simple cycle, evaporative, and humidified) using a CO 2 -argon-steam-oxyfuel (CARSOXY) mixture as a working fluid to identify their optimal working conditions with respect to cycle efficiency and specific work output. The performance of the five cycles using CARSOXY is estimated for wet and dry compression, and a cycle is suggested for each range of working conditions. The results of this paper are based on MATLAB codes, which have been developed to conduct the cycle analysis for CARSOXY gas turbines, assuming a stoichiometric condition with an equivalence ratio of 1.0. Analyses are based on the higher heating value (HHV) of methane as fuel. This paper also identifies domains of operating conditions for each cycle, where the efficiency of CARSOXY cycles can be increased by up to 12% compared to air-driven cycles. The CARSOXY heat exchanged cycle has the highest efficiency among the other CARSOXY cycles in the compressor pressure ratio domain of 2–3 and 6–10, whereas, at 3–6, the humidified cycle has the highest efficiency. The evaporative cycle has intermediate efficiency values, while the simple cycle and the free turbine-simple cycle have the lowest efficiencies amongst the five cycles. Additionally, a 10% increase in the cycle efficiency can be theoretically achieved by using the newly suggested CARSOXY blend that has the molar fractions of 47% argon, 10% carbon dioxide, 10% H 2 O, and 33% oxyfuel at low compressor inlet temperatures, thus theoretically enabling the use of carbon capture technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Odi Fawwaz Alrebei & Philip Bowen & Agustin Valera Medina, 2020. "Parametric Study of Various Thermodynamic Cycles for the Use of Unconventional Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4656-:d:410213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ibrahim, Thamir K. & Mohammed, Mohammed Kamil & Awad, Omar I. & Abdalla, Ahmed N. & Basrawi, Firdaus & Mohammed, Marwah N. & Najafi, G. & Mamat, Rizalman, 2018. "A comprehensive review on the exergy analysis of combined cycle power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 835-850.
    2. Sarafraz, M.M. & Jafarian, M. & Arjomandi, M. & Nathan, G.J., 2017. "Potential use of liquid metal oxides for chemical looping gasification: A thermodynamic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 702-712.
    3. M. M. Sarafraz & Mohammad Reza Safaei & M. Jafarian & Marjan Goodarzi & M. Arjomandi, 2019. "High Quality Syngas Production with Supercritical Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Water–Gas Shift Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Gibbins, Jon & Chalmers, Hannah, 2008. "Carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4317-4322, December.
    5. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena, 2019. "Upgrading existing gas-steam combined cycle power plants through steam injection and methane steam reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 229-243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anwar Hamdan Al Assaf & Abdulkarem Amhamed & Odi Fawwaz Alrebei, 2022. "State of the Art in Humidified Gas Turbine Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-32, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao, Xiwen & Zhao, Zhicheng & Li, Jishuo & Zhang, Bohan & Zhou, Haodong & Xu, Kaili, 2020. "Experimental investigation of physicochemical and slagging characteristics of inorganic constituents in ash residues from gasification of different herbaceous biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Liu, Zhibin & Zhao, Chuankai & Cai, Longhao & Long, Xinman, 2022. "Steady state modelling of steam-gasification of biomass for H2-rich syngas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    3. Rahman, MD Mashiur & Henriksen, Ulrik Birk & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Arnavat, Maria Puig, 2020. "Design, construction and operation of a low-tar biomass (LTB) gasifier for power applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Ivan Lorencin & Nikola Anđelić & Vedran Mrzljak & Zlatan Car, 2019. "Genetic Algorithm Approach to Design of Multi-Layer Perceptron for Combined Cycle Power Plant Electrical Power Output Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Setiawan, Andri D. & Cuppen, Eefje, 2013. "Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1188-1199.
    7. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Xiaolong, Chen & Yiqiang, Li & Xiang, Tang & Huan, Qi & Xuebing, Sun & Jianghao, Luo, 2021. "Effect of gravity segregation on CO2 flooding under various pressure conditions: Application to CO2 sequestration and oil production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    10. Xie, Heping & Liu, Tao & Wang, Yufei & Wu, Yifan & Wang, Fuhuan & Tang, Liang & Jiang, Wen & Liang, Bin, 2017. "Enhancement of electricity generation in CO2 mineralization cell by using sodium sulfate as the reaction medium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 991-999.
    11. Christian Leßmann & Arne Steinkraus, 2016. "Climate Notes: “Carbon Capture and Storage” – What is the Cost of Cutting Emissions?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(05), pages 51-54, March.
    12. Aydin, Gokhan & Karakurt, Izzet & Aydiner, Kerim, 2010. "Evaluation of geologic storage options of CO2: Applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5072-5080, September.
    13. Sagar Roy & Smruti Ragunath, 2018. "Emerging Membrane Technologies for Water and Energy Sustainability: Future Prospects, Constraints and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Stewart Russell & Nils Markusson & Vivian Scott, 2012. "What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 651-668, August.
    15. Dongdong Song & Tong Jiang & Chuanping Rao, 2022. "Review of Policy Framework for the Development of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Konstantin Kalmykov & Irina Anikina & Daria Kolbantseva & Milana Trescheva & Dmitriy Treschev & Aleksandr Kalyutik & Alena Aleshina & Iaroslav Vladimirov, 2022. "Use of Heat Pumps in the Hydrogen Production Cycle at Thermal Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Pourali, Mostafa & Esfahani, Javad Abolfazli, 2022. "Performance analysis of a micro-scale integrated hydrogen production system by analytical approach, machine learning, and response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Jiang, Kai & Ashworth, Peta & Zhang, Shiyi & Hu, Guoping, 2022. "Print media representations of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technology in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    19. Lin, Chih-Wei & Nazeri, Mahmoud & Bhattacharji, Ayan & Spicer, George & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2016. "Apparatus and method for calibrating a Coriolis mass flow meter for carbon dioxide at pressure and temperature conditions represented to CCS pipeline operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 759-764.
    20. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Lima, Matheus S.R. & de Souza, Gabriel F., 2020. "Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: Exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1336-1347.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4656-:d:410213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.