IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i2p25-d1573440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Imbalanced Transmission from R&D Inputs into Innovation Outputs and Impacts: Evidence from Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Stefka Slavova

    (Finance, Competitiveness and Investment Global Practice, Europe and Central Asia Region, The World Bank, Washington, DC 20037, USA)

  • Luis Rubalcaba

    (Department of Economics and Business Administration, University of Alcala, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain)

  • José Nicanor Franco-Riquelme

    (Department of Organization Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Innovation ecosystems use R&D inputs to generate innovation outputs first and innovation impacts later. But some countries show a relatively low transmission, such as in the case of Kazakhstan, the largest economy in Central Asia. This article analyzes the transmission from R&D into innovation outputs and impacts through a framework for which different factors matter, such as the company size, education and skills, competition, exports, and foreign ownership. Transmission is conceptually understood in two steps: from R&D into innovation outputs, and from innovation output into innovation impacts. The main hypothesis is that the high endowments of these company factors should lead to the better transmission of results and improved performance in terms of outputs and impacts. We test this using new evidence from Kazakhstan and the ECA region (Europe and Central as defined by the World Bank) as benchmarking, and data are from the Global Innovation Index (descriptive section) and the World Bank Enterprise Surveys (analytical section). The econometrics are a Crépon–Duguet–Mairesse (CDM) model in three steps: factors for propensity to invest in R&D, then to innovate, and, finally, innovation impacts on productivity. Results confirm the positive roles of factors, such as exports and education, in positive transmissions and uneven or insignificant results on productivity impacts from characteristics, such as age, size, and foreign ownership. The specifics for Kazakhstan suggest a potential for business innovation growth in the country. The paper concludes by suggesting key policy measures to unlock the potential for business innovation at a country level.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefka Slavova & Luis Rubalcaba & José Nicanor Franco-Riquelme, 2025. "Understanding Imbalanced Transmission from R&D Inputs into Innovation Outputs and Impacts: Evidence from Kazakhstan," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:25-:d:1573440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crespi, G. & Tacsir, E. & Vargas, F., 2014. "Innovation and productivity in services: Empirical evidence from Latin America," MERIT Working Papers 2014-069, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Audretsch, David B. & Belitski, Maksim, 2020. "The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carboni, Oliviero A. & Medda, Giuseppe, 2021. "External R&D and product innovation: Is over-outsourcing an issue?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Jaan Masso & Amaresh K Tiwari, 2021. "Productivity Implications Of R&D, Innovation And Capital Accumulation For Incumbents And Entrants: The Case Of Estonia," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 130, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    3. Bretschger, Lucas & Jo, Ara, 2024. "Complementarity between labor and energy: A firm-level analysis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Xin Liang & Yunjuan Liang & Weijia Kang & Hua Wei, 2024. "Research on military-civilian collaborative innovation of science and technology based on a stochastic differential game model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Bettina Peters & Rebecca Riley & Iulia Siedschlag & Priit Vahter & John McQuinn, 2018. "Internationalisation, innovation and productivity in services: evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(3), pages 585-615, August.
    6. Silveli Cristo-Andrade & João J. Ferreira & Arilda Teixeira & William C. McDowell, 2024. "Knowledge spillovers in business intelligence organisations: a strategic entrepreneurship perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 733-759, June.
    7. Ju Han Yeon & Seung-hwan Jang, 2023. "The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Belitski, Maksmi & Mariani, Marcello, 2023. "The effect of knowledge collaboration on business model reconfiguration," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 223-235.
    9. Duy Phan Khanh Nguyen & Thong Le Pham, 2025. "The simultaneous relationship between labor productivity and exports: The case of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 15(3), pages 44-62.
    10. Buyukbalci, Pinar & Sanguineti, Francesca & Sacco, Federica, 2024. "Rejuvenating business models via startup collaborations: Evidence from the Turkish context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Roberto Vivona & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2023. "The costs of collaborative innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 873-899, June.
    12. Su, Chi-Wei & Yuan, Xi & Umar, Muhammad & Lobonţ, Oana-Ramona, 2022. "Does technological innovation bring destruction or creation to the labor market?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Shamshul Nur Fatinah Shamsul Ariffin & Nurmalina Zainal Abidin & Mohamad Allif Rosly & Shamsul Baharin Saihani, 2023. "Factors Inducing the Adoption of Knowledge Management System (KMS) In SMEs, Large and Government Organizations. What Are the Intercepting Factors? A Systematic Review," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(1), pages 140-148.
    14. Grégory Guéneau & Didier Chabaud & Marie-Christine Chalus Sauvannet, 2022. "Opening entrepreneurial ecosystem’s black box: the power of networks in African low-income countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 753-772, June.
    15. Li, Longda, 2024. "The environmental spillovers of buyers' digital transformation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    16. Max Nathan & Anna Rosso, 2017. "Innovative events," Development Working Papers 429, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 08 Apr 2019.
    17. Tojeiro-Rivero, Damián, 2022. "What effect does the aggregate industrial R&D offshoring have on you? A multilevel study," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2).
    18. Jing Cao & Haiwei Jiang & Xiaomeng Ren & Jinchuan Shi, 2024. "Consumers’ risk perception, market demand, and firm innovation: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Feng Wang & Weiwei Liu, 2024. "The Current Status, Challenges, and Future of China’s Photovoltaic Industry: A Literature Review and Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Ronja Kirschning & Matthias Mrożewski, 2024. "Revisiting the knowledge spillover paradox: the impact of infrastructure," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:25-:d:1573440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.