IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v11y2023i1p18-d1027925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Uncertainty and Financial Firm Performance: Evidence from the Thai Economy as an Emerging Market in Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Worraphan Trakarnsirinont

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Wisuttorn Jitaree

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Wonlop Writthym Buachoom

    (KMITL Business School, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects that certain political-uncertainty factors have on financial firm performance in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). The results of a panel regression performed on a database of 7976 firm-years over 18-year unbalanced panel data from 2001 to 2018 show a mixed relationship between political uncertainty and firm performance. The constitutional reform harms the return on assets (ROA), and the government election and political protest significantly decreased the market value of equity (MVE). In contrast, constitutional reform increased MVE, and the government election positively impacted ROA. Therefore, this study emphasizes how political unpredictability is assumed to influence firm performance in Thailand’s economy, an Asian developing country.

Suggested Citation

  • Worraphan Trakarnsirinont & Wisuttorn Jitaree & Wonlop Writthym Buachoom, 2023. "Political Uncertainty and Financial Firm Performance: Evidence from the Thai Economy as an Emerging Market in Asia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:18-:d:1027925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/1/18/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/1/18/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walaa Wahid ElKelish & Mostafa Kamal Hassan, 2015. "Corporate governance disclosure and share price accuracy," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 265-286, September.
    2. Jason Zhang & Hong Zhu & Hung-bin Ding, 2013. "Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 381-392, May.
    3. Refk Selmi & Jamal Bouoiyour, 2020. "The financial costs of political uncertainty: Evidence from the 2016 US presidential elections," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(2), pages 166-185, May.
    4. James Ming Chen, 2017. "Risk and Uncertainty," Quantitative Perspectives on Behavioral Economics and Finance, in: Econophysics and Capital Asset Pricing, chapter 0, pages 189-211, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Smales, Lee A., 2014. "Political uncertainty and financial market uncertainty in an Australian context," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 415-435.
    6. Short, Helen & Keasey, Kevin, 1999. "Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 79-101, March.
    7. Ike Mathur & Manohar Singh, 2011. "Corporate political strategies," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 51(1), pages 252-277, March.
    8. Miaochen Lv & Manying Bai, 2019. "Political uncertainty and corporate debt financing: empirical evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(13), pages 1433-1449, March.
    9. Anne Margaret Lee, 2005. "A study in time," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7049), pages 438-438, July.
    10. Eric M. Bosire & Vincent O. Ongore, 2015. "Effects of Board Composition on Financial Performance: Empirical Analysis of Companies Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(1), pages 23-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badrul Muttakin, Mohammad & Chatterjee, Bikram & Khan, Arifur & Getie Mihret, Dessalegn & Roy, Rajat & Yaftian, Ali, 2022. "Corporate political donations, board gender diversity, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Australia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 290-299.
    2. Stavros E. Arvanitis & Theodoros V. Stamatopoulos & Dimitris Terzakis, 2018. "Is There a Non-linear Relationship of Market Value with Cash and Ownership?," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 68(1), pages 3-25, January-M.
    3. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    4. David M Keith & Jessica A Sameoto & Freya M Keyser & Christine A Ward-Paige, 2020. "Evaluating socio-economic and conservation impacts of management: A case study of time-area closures on Georges Bank," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Kirsten Burkhardt & Pascal Nguyen & Evelyne Poincelot, 2020. "Agents of change: Women in top management and corporate environmental performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1591-1604, July.
    6. Ben-Nasr, Hamdi & Bouslimi, Lobna & Ebrahim, M. Shahid & Zhong, Rui, 2020. "Political uncertainty and the choice of debt sources," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. M. Ameziane Lasfer, 2006. "The Interrelationship Between Managerial Ownership and Board Structure," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1006-1033, September.
    8. Sanjiva Prasad & Christopher J. Green & Victor Murinde, 2005. "Company Financial Structure: A Survey and Implications for Developing Economies," Chapters, in: Christopher J. Green & Colin Kirkpatrick & Victor Murinde (ed.), Finance and Development, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Maria-Teresa Marchica, "undated". "Debt Maturity and the Characteristics of Ownership Structure: An Empirical Investigation of UK Firms," Discussion Papers 05/29, Department of Economics, University of York.
    10. Sanghoon Lee, 2008. "Ownership Structure and Financial Performance: Evidence from Panel Data of South Korea," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2008_17, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    11. Hu, Gang & Liu, Yiye & Wang, Jacqueline Wenjie & Zhou, Gaoguang & Zhu, Xindong, 2022. "Insider ownership and stock price crash risk around the globe," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Noel O'Sullivan, 2005. "Why do executives serve as non-executives? Pre-Cadbury evidence from UK non-financial companies," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 161-176.
    13. Nezhat Shakeri & Farhad Hajsheikholeslami & Amir abbas Momenan & Fereidoun Azizi, 2017. "An Overview on Cardiovascular Risks Definitions by Using Survival Analysis Techniques-Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: 13-Year Follow-Up Outcomes," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 197-197, April.
    14. McKnight, Phillip J. & Weir, Charlie, 2009. "Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 139-158, May.
    15. Chen, Shihua & Chen, Yulin & Jebran, Khalil, 2021. "Trust and corporate social responsibility: From expected utility and social normative perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 518-530.
    16. Chidiebele Innocent Onyali & Chinedu Uchenna Okerekeoti, 2018. "Board Heterogeneity and Corporate Performance of Firms in Nigeria," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 103-117, July.
    17. Andrea Vacca & Antonio Iazzi & Demetris Vrontis & Monica Fait, 2020. "The Role of Gender Diversity on Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Kesternich, Iris & Schnitzer, Monika, 2010. "Who is afraid of political risk? Multinational firms and their choice of capital structure," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 208-218, November.
    19. Elsayed, Mohamed & Elshandidy, Tamer & Ahmed, Yousry, 2022. "Corporate failure in the UK: An examination of corporate governance reforms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:18-:d:1027925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.