IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i2p166-d1566206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can the Protection of Important Agricultural Heritage Sites Contribute to the Green Development of Agriculture: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Mo

    (College of Marxism, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Song Chen

    (College of Marxism, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

  • Shenwei Wan

    (School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Lei Zhou

    (School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Shiyuan Wang

    (School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

Abstract

The protection of agricultural heritage sites has become a global human responsibility and consensus. However, the potential effect of agricultural heritage sites on the green development of agriculture has currently been ignored. Since ancient times, China has been founded on agriculture, and the number of important agricultural cultural heritages ranks first in the world, with strong representativeness. The two-way fixed effects model was employed to empirically test the positive impact of agricultural heritage site protection on the green development of agriculture, utilising data from 30 provincial units in China over a 21-year period from 2001 to 2021 in this paper. Additionally, a mediating effect model was used to test the potential mechanism. The specific conclusions are as follows: firstly, the protection of agricultural heritage sites has a significant positive effect on the green development of agriculture; secondly, the protection of agricultural heritage sites can advance the agricultural industrial structure, increase the land transfer rate, strengthen the construction of new agricultural management organisations, enhance financial investment in supporting, and promote green technology innovation. The five paths were found to have passed the mediation effect test. Thirdly, the positive effect of protecting agricultural heritage sites on the green development of agriculture is heterogeneous. Specifically, the effect is more pronounced in the eastern and central regions, particularly in areas with higher levels of AI development and lower urbanisation. The ultimate objective is to utilise evidence from China to develop nature-based solutions for the protection and utilisation of agricultural heritage and green development of agriculture in other world agricultural heritage sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Mo & Song Chen & Shenwei Wan & Lei Zhou & Shiyuan Wang, 2025. "How Can the Protection of Important Agricultural Heritage Sites Contribute to the Green Development of Agriculture: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:166-:d:1566206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/2/166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/2/166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinkuan Yu & Yao Sun & Feng Wei, 2024. "Green Development of Chinese Agriculture from the Perspective of Bidirectional Correlation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Jelena Vapa Tankosić & Svetlana Ignjatijević & Nemanja Lekić & Nataša Kljajić & Miloš Ivaniš & Slobodan Andžić & Dejan Ristić, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Attitudes and Risk for Adoption with Respect to Farmers’ Participation in the Agri-Environmental Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Han Zhang & Dongli Wu, 2023. "The Impact of Rural Industrial Integration on Agricultural Green Productivity Based on the Contract Choice Perspective of Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Narducci, Jenna & Quintas-Soriano, Cristina & Castro, Antonio & Som-Castellano, Rebecca & Brandt, Jodi S., 2019. "Implications of urban growth and farmland loss for ecosystem services in the western United States," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Yuan, Xiao & Zhang, Jinlong & Shi, Jing & Wang, Jiachen, 2024. "What can green finance do for high-quality agricultural development? Fresh insights from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Jingyi Li & Jiaxin He & Lun Yang & Qingwen Min, 2023. "Does the Identification of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems Promote Economic Growth? Empirical Analysis Based on County Data from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Ana Iglesias & Berta Sánchez & Luis Garrote & Iván López, 2017. "Towards Adaptation to Climate Change: Water for Rice in the Coastal Wetlands of Doñana, Southern Spain," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(2), pages 629-653, January.
    8. L. F. Schulte-Uebbing & A. H. W. Beusen & A. F. Bouwman & W. de Vries, 2022. "From planetary to regional boundaries for agricultural nitrogen pollution," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7932), pages 507-512, October.
    9. Yunsi Chen & Sumin Hu & Haoqiang Wu, 2023. "The Digital Economy, Green Technology Innovation, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Song, Malin & Fisher, Ron & Kwoh, Yusen, 2019. "Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 361-368.
    11. Qi Jiang & Jizhi Li & Hongyun Si & Yangyue Su, 2022. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Agricultural Green Development: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Xiaopiao Yang & Yuluan Zhao & Jia Zhao & Chao Shi & Bailu Deng, 2022. "Tourists’ Perceived Attitudes toward the Famous Terraced Agricultural Cultural Heritage Landscape in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Jun & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "How does energy poverty eradication promote green growth in China? The role of technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Wang, Jingyu & Peng, Lu & Chen, Jiancheng & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2024. "Impact of rural industrial integration on farmers' income: Evidence from agricultural counties in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Shenhua Liu & Deheng Xiao, 2024. "Can Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone Promote Low-Carbon Urban Development? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Senhua Huang & Lingming Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Urban Total-Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from 275 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Xuan Liu & Xuexi Huo, 2024. "Green Finance, Land Transfer and China’s Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Song, Yanwu & Zhang, Jinrui & Song, Yingkang & Fan, Xinran & Zhu, Yuqing & Zhang, Chen, 2020. "Can industry-university-research collaborative innovation efficiency reduce carbon emissions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Weihua Su & Yuying Wang & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Chonghui Zhang, 2020. "Carbon dioxide emission decomposition along the gradient of economic development: The case of energy sustainability in the G7 and Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 657-669, July.
    8. Yu Zhang & Xiaomeng Liu & Jiaoping Yang, 2024. "Digital Economy, Green Dual Innovation and Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Lixin Zhou & Caiping Qu & Li Zhi, 2024. "Research on the Impact of Digital Infrastructure on Urban Breakthrough Green Innovation: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Huang, Hongyun & Mbanyele, William & Wang, Fengrong & Song, Malin & Wang, Yuzhang, 2022. "Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Lihuan Huang & Ying Ping, 2024. "The Impact of Technological Innovation on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: The Mediating Role of Environmental Regulation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Feng Zhou & Chunhui Wen, 2023. "Research on the Level of Agricultural Green Development, Regional Disparities, and Dynamic Distribution Evolution in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-47, July.
    13. Min Zhu & Mengqi Sun & Ehsan Elahi & Yajie Li & Zainab Khalid, 2023. "Analyzing the Relationship between Green Finance and Agricultural Industrial Upgrading: A Panel Data Study of 31 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Wen Yao & Zhuo Sun, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on High-Quality Development of Agriculture: A China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Ming‐Lang Tseng & Hien Minh Ha & Thi Phuong Thuy Tran & Tat‐Dat Bui & Chih‐Cheng Chen & Chun‐Wei Lin, 2022. "Building a data‐driven circular supply chain hierarchical structure: Resource recovery implementation drives circular business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2082-2106, July.
    16. Kurt Smith & Frederick Cubbage, 2024. "Land Fragmentation and Heirs Property: Current Issues and Policy Responses," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    18. Jiaxuan Li & Zhiyuan Peng, 2024. "Impact of Digital Villages on Agricultural Green Growth Based on Empirical Analysis of Chinese Provincial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, November.
    19. Muntasir Murshed & Mohamed Elheddad & Rizwan Ahmed & Mohga Bassim & Ei Thuzar Than, 2022. "Foreign Direct Investments, Renewable Electricity Output, and Ecological Footprints: Do Financial Globalization Facilitate Renewable Energy Transition and Environmental Welfare in Bangladesh?," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(1), pages 33-78, March.
    20. Yuan Zhao & Tian Zhang & Ting Wu & Shujing Xu & Shuwang Yang, 2021. "Effects of Technological Progress from Different Sources on Haze Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:166-:d:1566206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.