IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i17p1841-d1737492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farm Context and Farmers’ Perceptions of the Compatibility, Complexity and Relative Advantage of Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Geoff Kaine

    (Manaaki Whenua–Landcare Research, Hamilton 2340, New Zealand)

  • Vic Wright

    (UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia)

Abstract

Agriculture is under increasing pressure to change practices and technologies due to climate change, market forces and community pressures. The strongest influences on farmers’ adoption of practices and technologies are their perceptions of the relevant benefits and costs. Differences in the fine-grained characteristics of farm systems can lead to diversity in farmers’ perceptions. Where this is the case, the rate of adoption is best increased through product development rather than promotion. The extent to which differences in the characteristics of farm systems translate into diversity in farmers’ perceptions of innovations has rarely been explored. Our purpose was to investigate whether the diversity in farmers’ perceptions of practices correlated with fine-grained differences in the characteristics of their farm systems using survey data on four management practices used by livestock farmers in New Zealand. We found that the diversity in farmers’ perceptions did correlate with subtle differences in a variety of characteristics of farm systems. This result has important implications for research, extension and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoff Kaine & Vic Wright, 2025. "Farm Context and Farmers’ Perceptions of the Compatibility, Complexity and Relative Advantage of Innovations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1841-:d:1737492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Gebeyanesh Zerssa & Debela Feyssa & Dong-Gill Kim & Bettina Eichler-Löbermann, 2021. "Challenges of Smallholder Farming in Ethiopia and Opportunities by Adopting Climate-Smart Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Yunlong Sui & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Douthwaite, B. & Keatinge, J. D. H. & Park, J. R., 2001. "Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 819-836, May.
    5. Yari Vecchio & Marcello De Rosa & Gregorio Pauselli & Margherita Masi & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The leading role of perception: the FACOPA model to comprehend innovation adoption," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Enikő Lencsés & István Takács & Katalin Takács-György, 2014. "Farmers’ Perception of Precision Farming Technology among Hungarian Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Prahlad Lamichhane & Michalis Hadjikakou & Kelly K. Miller & Brett A. Bryan, 2022. "Climate change adaptation in smallholder agriculture: adoption, barriers, determinants, and policy implications," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Charles Samuel Mutengwa & Pearson Mnkeni & Aleck Kondwakwenda, 2023. "Climate-Smart Agriculture and Food Security in Southern Africa: A Review of the Vulnerability of Smallholder Agriculture and Food Security to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Prahlad Lamichhane & Michalis Hadjikakou & Kelly K. Miller & Brett A. Bryan, 2022. "Climate change adaptation in smallholder agriculture: adoption, barriers, determinants, and policy implications," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Wheeler, Sarah Ann, 2008. "What influences agricultural professionals' views towards organic agriculture?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 145-154, March.
    11. Geoff Kaine & Vic Wright & Suzanne Vallance, 2025. "Strategic, tactical, complex and simple changes to farm systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 930-948, May.
    12. Kyle Emerick & Manzoor H. Dar, 2021. "Farmer Field Days and Demonstrator Selection for Increasing Technology Adoption," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 103(4), pages 680-693, October.
    13. Renata Anibaldi & Sharyn Rundle-Thiele & Patricia David & Carina Roemer, 2021. "Theoretical Underpinnings in Research Investigating Barriers for Implementing Environmentally Sustainable Farming Practices: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prem Sagar Chapagain & Tibendra Raj Banskota & Shobha Shrestha & Narendra Raj Khanal & Zhang Yili & Jianzhong Yan & Liu Linshan & Basanta Paudel & Suresh C. Rai & Md. Nurul Islam & Khagendra Raj Poude, 2025. "Studies on adaptive capacity to climate change: a synthesis of changing concepts, dimensions, and indicators," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Francisco Rosas & Mariana Sans, 2023. "Quantifying the value to the farmer from adopting climate risk-reducing technologies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Jiahong Yuan & Xiaoyu Li & Zilai Sun & Junhu Ruan, 2021. "Will the Adoption of Early Fertigation Techniques Hinder Famers’ Technology Renewal? Evidence from Fresh Growers in Shaanxi, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Montes de Oca Munguia, Oscar & Pannell, David J. & Llewellyn, Rick & Stahlmann-Brown, Philip, 2021. "Adoption pathway analysis: Representing the dynamics and diversity of adoption for agricultural practices," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    6. Jinxia Wang & Yunfeng Tan & Qiong Hu & Huarong Cheng & Fang Gao, 2024. "Research on talent cultivation for rural revitalization based on three-party evolutionary game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Takács-György, Katalin, 2015. "Chemical Use in Crop Production – Can it be Reduced by New Technologies?," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2015(3), June.
    8. Goisser, Simon & Mempel, Heike & Bitsch, Vera, 2020. "Food-Scanners as a Radical Innovation in German Fresh Produce Supply Chains," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(02), April.
    9. MAMO, Yonas Abera & HAJI, Jema & LEGESSE, Belaineh & SASSI, Maria, . "Challenges of agricultural cooperatives and their impact on the profitability of potato growers in eastern Ethiopia," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 24(2).
    10. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: Farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 460-472, April.
    11. Phumelelani Mbuqwa & Hezekiel Bheki Magagula & Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba & Gbenga Abayomi Afuye, 2024. "Interdecadal Variations in Agricultural Drought Monitoring Using Land Surface Temperature and Vegetation Indices: A Case of the Amahlathi Local Municipality in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Letty, Brigid & Shezi, Zanele & Mudhara, Maxwell, 2012. "An exploration of agricultural grassroots innovation in South Africa and implications for innovation indicator development," MERIT Working Papers 2012-023, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Mingyue Li & Pujie Zhao & Yu Sun, 2025. "Impacts of Green Perception Benefits and Environmental Regulation Intensity on Farmers’ Agricultural Green Production Willingness: A New Perspective of Technology Acquisition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, June.
    14. Leight, Jessica & Awonon, Josué & Pedehombga, Abdoulaye & Ganaba, Rasmané & Gelli, Aulo, 2022. "How light is too light touch: The effect of a short training-based intervention on household poultry production in Burkina Faso," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Rickards, Chima & Marenya, Paswel & Chiduwa, Mazvita & Eitzinger, Anton & Fisher, Monica & Snapp, Sieglinde, 2025. "Enhancing farmers' agency is a more effective extension paradigm: The case of soil health management in Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. Das, Nandini & Gupta, Anubhab & Majumder, Binoy & Das, Mahamitra & Muniappan, Rangaswamy, 2024. "Does Training Farmers on Multiple Technologies Deter Adoption? Evidence from a Farm Management Training Program in Bangladesh," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343784, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Yu Du & Hui Feng & Qingsong Zhang & Shaofeng Zheng, 2025. "Influence of Information Literacy on Farmers’ Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior: The Moderating Role of Risk Attitude," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Perelli, Chiara & Cacchiarelli, Luca & Peveri, Valentina & Branca, Giacomo, 2024. "Gender equality and sustainable development: A cross-country study on women's contribution to the adoption of the climate-smart agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Oscar Montes de Oca Munguia & Rick Llewellyn, 2020. "The Adopters versus the Technology: Which Matters More when Predicting or Explaining Adoption?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 80-91, March.
    20. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1841-:d:1737492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.