IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2024i1p62-d1555829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint of Milk Processing—Case Study of Polish Dairy

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska

    (Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, Department of Technology and Refrigeration Techniques, Al. Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego 84, 92-202 Lodz, Poland)

  • Anna M. Klepacka

    (Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Ewelina Włodarczyk

    (Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, Department of Technology and Refrigeration Techniques, Al. Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego 84, 92-202 Lodz, Poland)

  • Łukasz Przybysz

    (Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, Department of Technology and Refrigeration Techniques, Al. Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego 84, 92-202 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

Sustainable milk processing is essential to minimize negative environmental impacts. The purpose of this study was to determine the carbon footprint (CF) of the production of milk products in an industrial plant in Poland. Annual production and technological processes were analyzed, and relevant parameters were determined, as well as the method of data collection according to the chosen method of analysis and the developed database. It was found that each process is a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and affects the CF of the product. The total carbon footprint of the production of milk products was 0.367 kgCO 2eq /kg. The average GHG emissions associated with production came mainly from indirect emissions (electricity consumption) and accounted for 50% of the total emissions. The determined relationship between the CF and monthly production volume also allows production planning in the context of sustainability. An increase in the monthly production volume by about 12% results in a reduction in the carbon footprint by about 18%. Decarbonization of dairies is possible through the use of renewable energy sources. Determining the CF of milk processing is the first step toward reducing GHG emissions, improving the sustainability of the sector and aligning with global trends and regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Anna M. Klepacka & Ewelina Włodarczyk & Łukasz Przybysz, 2024. "Carbon Footprint of Milk Processing—Case Study of Polish Dairy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:62-:d:1555829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casey, J.W. & Holden, N.M., 2005. "Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 97-114, October.
    2. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Ewelina Włodarczyk & Łukasz Przybysz, 2024. "Carbon Footprint of Flour Production in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin Hu & Lijie Zhang & Chao Liang & Xiao Yang & Zhengxiang Shi & Chaoyuan Wang, 2024. "Characterizing Spatial and Temporal Variations in N 2 O Emissions from Dairy Manure Management in China Based on IPCC Methodology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Agostinho, F. & Oliveira, M.W. & Pulselli, F.M. & Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Giannetti, B.F., 2019. "Emergy accounting as a support for a strategic planning towards a regional sustainable milk production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Thomassen, M.A. & Dolman, M.A. & van Calker, K.J. & de Boer, I.J.M., 2009. "Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2278-2284, June.
    4. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Ewelina Włodarczyk & Łukasz Przybysz, 2024. "Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Mill According to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Aysun Yener Ögür, 2024. "The Effect of Awareness of Renewable Energy Resources on Sustainable Production in Dairy Farming: The Case of Konya Province (Turkey)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Beauchemin, Karen A. & Henry Janzen, H. & Little, Shannan M. & McAllister, Tim A. & McGinn, Sean M., 2010. "Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(6), pages 371-379, July.
    7. Rahmann, Gerold (Ed.) & Aksoy, Uygun (Ed.), 2014. "Building Organic Bridges: Volume 1, Argentina - France," Thünen Reports 20,1, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    8. Ludemann, Cameron I. & Byrne, Timothy J. & Sise, Judith A. & Amer, Peter R., 2012. "Selection indices offer potential for New Zealand sheep farmers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions per unit of product," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 1(4), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Huang, Wei, 2022. "Demand for plant-based milk and effects of a carbon tax on fresh milk consumption in Sweden," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-529.
    10. Senga Kiessé, Tristan & Corson, Michael S. & Eugène, Maguy, 2022. "The potential of kernel density estimation for modelling relations among dairy farm characteristics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Vergé, X.P.C. & Dyer, J.A. & Desjardins, R.L. & Worth, D., 2008. "Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian beef industry," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 126-134, September.
    12. Hoffman, Eric & Cavigelli, Michel A. & Camargo, Gustavo & Ryan, Matthew & Ackroyd, Victoria J. & Richard, Tom L. & Mirsky, Steven, 2018. "Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional grain crop production: Accounting for nutrient inflows," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 89-96.
    13. Malý, M. & Hálová, P. & Havlíková, M. & Žáková-Kroupová, Z., 2017. "Valuation of Public Goods: The Case of Emissions from Livestock Holdings in the Czech Republic," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(01), March.
    14. Raymond L. Desjardins & Devon E. Worth & Xavier P. C. Vergé & Dominique Maxime & Jim Dyer & Darrel Cerkowniak, 2012. "Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(12), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Pelletier, N., 2008. "Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 67-73, September.
    16. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Omid, Mahmoud & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2013. "On the study of energy use and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in greenhouse cucumber production in Yazd province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 63-71.
    17. Verge, X.P.C. & Dyer, J.A. & Desjardins, R.L. & Worth, D., 2007. "Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 683-693, June.
    18. Castanheira, É.G. & Dias, A.C. & Arroja, L. & Amaro, R., 2010. "The environmental performance of milk production on a typical Portuguese dairy farm," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 498-507, September.
    19. Fiona Kenyon & Jan M. Dick & Ron I. Smith & Drew G. Coulter & David McBean & Philip J. Skuce, 2013. "Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Worm Control in Lambs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Ludemann, C.I. & Eckard, R.J. & Cullen, B.R. & Jacobs, J.L. & Malcolm, B. & Smith, K.F., 2015. "Higher energy concentration traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) may increase profitability and improve energy conversion on dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 89-100.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:62-:d:1555829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.