IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2024i1p32-d1553762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intensive Annual Forage Cultivation via Diversified Sowing Under a Mixed-Cropping System to Increase Production and Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangyu Wei

    (School of Forestry and Grassland Industry, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Ningxia Grass and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Qin Feng

    (School of Forestry and Grassland Industry, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Ningxia Grass and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Jianqiang Deng

    (School of Forestry and Grassland Industry, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Ningxia Grass and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Haiying Hu

    (School of Forestry and Grassland Industry, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Ningxia Grass and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Qiaoli Ma

    (School of Forestry and Grassland Industry, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Ningxia Grass and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Jian Lan

    (School of Forestry and Grassland Industry, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Ningxia Grass and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
    Key Laboratory for Model Innovation in Forage Production Efficiency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yinchuan 750021, China)

Abstract

Intensive annual forage cultivation via diversified sowing can increase resource-use efficiency and meet the food requirements of the growing population. However, increasing cultivation time could increase energy demands and production costs with accompanying environmental hazards, such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A 2-year field experiment including three cropping systems (forage oat monoculture [O], forage oat–common vetch mixed-cropping [O/V], and common vetch monoculture [V]) and two sowing dates (spring and summer) was conducted to comprehensively assess productivity performance, energy utilization, and ecological efficiency under a cereal–legume mixed system over two sowing seasons in Northwestern China. The average system dry matter yield and economic benefit in the mixed system increased by 70.9% and 132.6%, respectively, compared to those of the monoculture system. The application of a mixed-cropping system increased energy efficiency and the ecoefficiency index (EEI) by 61.4% and 132.3%, respectively, with a decline in GHG emission intensity (GHGI) by 49.9%. Spring sowing increased average forage productivity and economic benefit by 9.3% and 18.6%, respectively, with a 23.0% decline in GHGI compared with that engendered by summer sowing. However, there was no correlation between the mixed-cropping system and single sowing date, and the average dry matter yield, economic benefit, and GHGI of the mixed-cropping system were 7.8 t ha −1 , 1478.4 USD ha −1 , and 0.3 kg CO 2 e kg −1 , respectively. Furthermore, compared with the monoculture system, the combination of spring and summer seasons under the mixed-cropping system could increase the average annual system forage productivity, economic benefit, and EEI by 37.0%, 49.9%, and 53.1%, respectively, while reducing GHGI by 48.4%. This study demonstrates that the mixed forage oat and common vetch during spring and summer was the sustainable cropping system that achieved high system productivity, good economic returns, high energy utilization, and low environmental risk in Northwestern China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangyu Wei & Qin Feng & Jianqiang Deng & Haiying Hu & Qiaoli Ma & Jian Lan, 2024. "Intensive Annual Forage Cultivation via Diversified Sowing Under a Mixed-Cropping System to Increase Production and Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:32-:d:1553762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/32/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/1/32/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Liu & Haiying Tang & Aamer Muhammad & Guoqin Huang, 2019. "Emission mechanism and reduction countermeasures of agricultural greenhouse gases – a review," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 160-174, April.
    2. Tongwane, Mphethe Isaac & Moeletsi, Mokhele Edmond, 2018. "A review of greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector in Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 124-134.
    3. Choudhary, Mukesh & Rana, K.S. & Bana, R.S. & Ghasal, P.C. & Choudhary, G.L. & Jakhar, Praveen & Verma, R.K., 2017. "Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of pearl millet – mustard cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture in rainfed semi-arid agro-ecosystem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1052-1058.
    4. Deng, Jianqiang & Zhang, Zhixin & Liang, Zhiting & Li, Zhou & Yang, Xianlong & Wang, Zikui & Coulter, Jeffrey A. & Shen, Yuying, 2020. "Replacing summer fallow with annual forage improves crude protein productivity and water use efficiency of the summer fallow-winter wheat cropping system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sushanta Kumar Naik & Santosh Sambhaji Mali & Bal Krishna Jha & Rakesh Kumar & Surajit Mondal & Janki Sharan Mishra & Arun Kumar Singh & Ashis Kumar Biswas & Arbind Kumar Choudhary & Jaipal Singh Chou, 2023. "Intensification of Rice-Fallow Agroecosystem of South Asia with Oilseeds and Pulses: Impacts on System Productivity, Soil Carbon Dynamics and Energetics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Singh, Ranbir & Singh, Ajay & Sheoran, Parvender & Fagodiya, R.K. & Rai, Arvind Kumar & Chandra, Priyanka & Rani, Sonia & Yadav, Rajender Kumar & Sharma, P.C., 2022. "Energy efficiency and carbon footprints of rice-wheat system under long-term tillage and residue management practices in western Indo-Gangetic Plains in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    3. Guofeng Wang & Pu Liu & Jinmiao Hu & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Agriculture Methane Emissions in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Pritpal Singh & Gurdeep Singh & G. P. S. Sodhi, 2022. "Data envelopment analysis based optimization for improving net ecosystem carbon and energy budget in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivation: methods and a case study of north-western India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2079-2119, February.
    5. Lai, Xingfa & Yang, Xianlong & Wang, Zikui & Shen, Yuying & Ma, Longshuai, 2022. "Productivity and water use in forage-winter wheat cropping systems across variable precipitation gradients on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Kumar, Adarsh & Rana, K.S. & Choudhary, Anil K. & Bana, R.S. & Sharma, V.K. & Prasad, Shiv & Gupta, Gaurendra & Choudhary, Mukesh & Pradhan, Amaresh & Rajpoot, Sudhir K. & Kumar, Abhishek & Kumar, Ami, 2021. "Energy budgeting and carbon footprints of zero-tilled pigeonpea–wheat cropping system under sole or dual crop basis residue mulching and Zn-fertilization in a semi-arid agro-ecology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    7. Mingxia Shi & Yibo Wang, 2023. "Do Green Transfer Payments Contribute to Carbon Emission Reduction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Hui Li & Xinjun Dai & Zhiqiang Gao, 2024. "Dependency of Long-Term Soil Quality Controls on Summer Fallow Tillage and Soil Layers for Dryland Winter Wheat in Loess Plateau," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Charles Samuel Mutengwa & Pearson Mnkeni & Aleck Kondwakwenda, 2023. "Climate-Smart Agriculture and Food Security in Southern Africa: A Review of the Vulnerability of Smallholder Agriculture and Food Security to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Iskid Jacquet & Jianjun Zhang & Ke Wang & Sen Liang & Shu Fu & Shidong Liu, 2025. "Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture in Benin: spatial estimation and reduction options," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 7325-7346, March.
    11. Jat, H.S. & Jat, R.D. & Nanwal, R.K. & Lohan, Shiv Kumar & Yadav, A.K. & Poonia, Tanuja & Sharma, P.C. & Jat, M.L., 2020. "Energy use efficiency of crop residue management for sustainable energy and agriculture conservation in NW India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1372-1382.
    12. Otsuka, Keijiro & Jayne, T.S. & Mano, Yukichi & Takahashi, Kazushi, 2024. "Viewpoint: Toward a sustainable Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of maize and rice," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Régina D.C. Bonou-zin & Khalil Allali & Aziz Fadlaoui, 2019. "Environmental Efficiency of Organic and Conventional Cotton in Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Marta Bengoa & Somya Mathur & Badri Narayanan & Hanna C. Norberg, 2021. "Environmental Effects of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement: A Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach," Journal of African Trade, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 36-48, December.
    15. Leszek Sieczko & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska & Anna Sieczko, 2024. "Variability of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Relation to Economic and Ecological Indicators from Cattle Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Arkadiusz Sadowski & Natalia Genstwa-Namysł & Jagoda Zmyślona & Luboš Smutka, 2024. "Environmental Efficiency of Agriculture in Visegrád Group Countries vs. the EU and the World," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Endre Harsányi & Bashar Bashir & Gafar Almhamad & Omar Hijazi & Mona Maze & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Abdullah Alsalman & Glory O. Enaruvbe & Safwan Mohammed & Szilárd Szabó, 2021. "GHGs Emission from the Agricultural Sector within EU-28: A Multivariate Analysis Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Jarisch, Isabelle & Bödeker, Kai & Bingham, Logan Robert & Friedrich, Stefan & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2022. "The influence of discounting ecosystem services in robust multi-objective optimization – An application to a forestry-avocado land-use portfolio," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Charissa Bosma & Lars Hein, 2023. "The climate and land use change nexus: Implications for designing adaptation and conservation investment strategies in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3811-3830, October.
    20. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab, 2022. "Estimating smart energy inputs packages using hybrid optimisation technique to mitigate environmental emissions of commercial fish farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:32-:d:1553762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.