IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i4p752-d1105892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Omics and Genome Editing Studies on Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Tiziana Maria Sirangelo

    (CREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economy Analysis, Genomics and Bioinformatics Department, 26836 Montanaso Lombardo, Italy)

  • Richard Andrew Ludlow

    (School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK)

  • Tatiana Chenet

    (Department of Environment and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Luisa Pasti

    (Department of Environment and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Natasha Damiana Spadafora

    (Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

Abstract

Biomass is one of the most important sources of renewable energy and plays an important role in reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. Efficient biomass production is essential to obtain large amounts of sustainable energy with minimal environmental cost. However, the biochemical and molecular processes behind the synthesis of the main components of biomass are still not fully understood. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the most relevant studies on cell wall biosynthesis and degradation mechanisms, focusing on the lignocellulosic component, in which the conversion process to fermentable sugars is expensive, due to its recalcitrant nature. A focus is placed on multi-omics research involving genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics, since multi-omics approaches offer a unique opportunity to investigate the biological pathways underlying the genotype traits characterizing cell wall energy crops. Furthermore, our study highlights the advances in genome editing approaches and proposes the modification of the genes that are involved in the complex cell wall structure as a feasible solution to an efficient biomass production. Several key points for future research activities based on these emerging technologies are also discussed, focusing on the combination of multi-omics and gene editing approaches, which offer potential for improved biomass valorization and the development of tangible bioproducts.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiziana Maria Sirangelo & Richard Andrew Ludlow & Tatiana Chenet & Luisa Pasti & Natasha Damiana Spadafora, 2023. "Multi-Omics and Genome Editing Studies on Plant Cell Walls to Improve Biomass Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:752-:d:1105892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/4/752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/4/752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cassie Marie Welker & Vimal Kumar Balasubramanian & Carloalberto Petti & Krishan Mohan Rai & Seth DeBolt & Venugopal Mendu, 2015. "Engineering Plant Biomass Lignin Content and Composition for Biofuels and Bioproducts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Alexander A. Myburg & Dario Grattapaglia & Gerald A. Tuskan & Uffe Hellsten & Richard D. Hayes & Jane Grimwood & Jerry Jenkins & Erika Lindquist & Hope Tice & Diane Bauer & David M. Goodstein & Inna D, 2014. "The genome of Eucalyptus grandis," Nature, Nature, vol. 510(7505), pages 356-362, June.
    3. Monika Yadav & Kunwar Paritosh & Aakash Chawade & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2018. "Genetic Engineering of Energy Crops to Reduce Recalcitrance and Enhance Biomass Digestibility," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    4. John T. Lovell & Alice H. MacQueen & Sujan Mamidi & Jason Bonnette & Jerry Jenkins & Joseph D. Napier & Avinash Sreedasyam & Adam Healey & Adam Session & Shengqiang Shu & Kerrie Barry & Stacy Bonos & , 2021. "Genomic mechanisms of climate adaptation in polyploid bioenergy switchgrass," Nature, Nature, vol. 590(7846), pages 438-444, February.
    5. Lauri, Pekka & Havlík, Petr & Kindermann, Georg & Forsell, Nicklas & Böttcher, Hannes & Obersteiner, Michael, 2014. "Woody biomass energy potential in 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 19-31.
    6. He, Lixia & English, Burton C. & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel G. & Hodges, Donald G., 2014. "Woody biomass potential for energy feedstock in United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 174-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Yazhen & Deppermann, Andre & Havlík, Petr & Frank, Stefan & Ren, Ming & Zhao, Hao & Ma, Lin & Fang, Chen & Chen, Qi & Dai, Hancheng, 2023. "Global land-use and sustainability implications of enhanced bioenergy import of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    2. Martino, Gaetano & Polinori, Paolo & Bufacchi, Marina & Rossetti, Enrica, 2020. "The biomass potential availability from olive cropping in Italy in a business perspective: Methodological approach and tentative estimates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 526-534.
    3. Joseph I. Orisaleye & Simeon O. Jekayinfa & Ralf Pecenka & Adebayo A. Ogundare & Michael O. Akinseloyin & Opeyemi L. Fadipe, 2022. "Investigation of the Effects of Torrefaction Temperature and Residence Time on the Fuel Quality of Corncobs in a Fixed-Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Randall W. Jackson & Amir Borges Ferreira Neto & Elham Erfanian & Péter Járosi, 2019. "Woody Biomass Processing and Rural Regional Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(3), pages 234-247, August.
    5. Gupte, Ameya Pankaj & Basaglia, Marina & Casella, Sergio & Favaro, Lorenzo, 2022. "Rice waste streams as a promising source of biofuels: feedstocks, biotechnologies and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Vikas Menghwani & Chad Walker & Tim Kalke & Bram Noble & Greg Poelzer, 2022. "Harvesting Local Energy: A Case Study of Community-Led Bioenergy Development in Galena, Alaska," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. M. Synek & J. Vašíček & M. Zeman, 2014. "Outlook of logging perspectives in the Czech Republic for the period 2013-2032," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(9), pages 372-381.
    8. Zanchini, Raffaele & Blanc, Simone & Pippinato, Liam & Poratelli, Francesca & Bruzzese, Stefano & Brun, Filippo, 2022. "Enhancing wood products through ENplus, FSC and PEFC certifications: Which attributes do consumers value the most?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Yahya, Muhammad & Kanjilal, Kakali & Dutta, Anupam & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Ghosh, Sajal, 2021. "Can clean energy stock price rule oil price? New evidences from a regime-switching model at first and second moments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Benítez, Almudena & Amaro-Gahete, Juan & Chien, Yu-Chuan & Caballero, Álvaro & Morales, Julián & Brandell, Daniel, 2022. "Recent advances in lithium-sulfur batteries using biomass-derived carbons as sulfur host," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. C. Tattersall Smith & Brenna Lattimore & Göran Berndes & Niclas Scott Bentsen & Ioannis Dimitriou & J.W.A. (Hans) Langeveld & Evelyne Thiffault, 2017. "Opportunities to encourage mobilization of sustainable bioenergy supply chains," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), May.
    12. Randall Jackson & Amir B. Ferreira Neto & Elham Erfanian, 2016. "Woody Biomass Processing: Potential Economic Impacts on Rural Regions," Working Papers Working Paper 2016-04-v3, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    13. Wu, Wenchao & Hasegawa, Tomoko & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Takahashi, Kiyoshi & Oshiro, Ken, 2020. "Assessment of bioenergy potential and associated costs in Japan for the 21st century," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 308-321.
    14. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & González-Aguirre, Jose Andrés & Poveda Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro & Cardona Alzate, Carlos A., 2021. "Thermochemical processing of woody biomass: A review focused on energy-driven applications and catalytic upgrading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Yan, Pu & Xiao, Chunwang & Xu, Li & Yu, Guirui & Li, Ang & Piao, Shilong & He, Nianpeng, 2020. "Biomass energy in China's terrestrial ecosystems: Insights into the nation's sustainable energy supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Fahmy, Hany, 2022. "The rise in investors’ awareness of climate risks after the Paris Agreement and the clean energy-oil-technology prices nexus," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Vera Marcantonio & Danilo Monarca & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Di Carlo & Luca Del Zotto & Enrico Bocci, 2020. "Biomass Steam Gasification, High-Temperature Gas Cleaning, and SOFC Model: A Parametric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Jonas Zetterholm & Elina Bryngemark & Johan Ahlström & Patrik Söderholm & Simon Harvey & Elisabeth Wetterlund, 2020. "Economic Evaluation of Large-Scale Biorefinery Deployment: A Framework Integrating Dynamic Biomass Market and Techno-Economic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    20. Work, James & Hauer, Grant & Luckert, M.K. (Marty), 2018. "What ethanol prices would induce growers to switch from agriculture to poplar in Alberta? A multiple options approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 51-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:752-:d:1105892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.