IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i11p1903-d970621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Community-Based Village Development Strategies in Indonesia: Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Leo Fatra Nugraha

    (Doctoral of Agricultural Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Lies Sulistyowati

    (Doctoral of Agricultural Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Iwan Setiawan

    (Doctoral of Agricultural Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Trisna Insan Noor

    (Doctoral of Agricultural Sciences Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

Abstract

To achieve a prosperous village community by utilizing all the potential and resources they have, village development needs to be carried out in a planned and sustainable manner by the village government and the community. This research aims to analyze alternative community-based village development strategies, and formulate the best strategies and programs for community-based village development. The data analysis method used is multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). The location of this research is Parentas Village and Cidugaleun Village, Indonesia. The results showed that the utilization of the five development capitals at the research site could not be utilized optimally. This is influenced by the poor state of infrastructure, which causes an increase in farm production costs and reduces the price of produce at harvest. From the results of the analysis, there are also five main strategic factors that influence community-based village development: the culture of mutual assistance, community dependence on assistance, private investment, availability of technology, and outside parties that can trigger conflicts between communities. From the results of the analysis, the best conclusion in the strategy that can be applied is to use alternative V in the form of maximizing government programs in infrastructure development by involving the community. Based on the results of the analysis, it is expected to be an alternative and strategy for the government in the development of community-based villages.

Suggested Citation

  • Leo Fatra Nugraha & Lies Sulistyowati & Iwan Setiawan & Trisna Insan Noor, 2022. "Alternative Community-Based Village Development Strategies in Indonesia: Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:11:p:1903-:d:970621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/11/1903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/11/1903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Budiasa, I Wayan, 2014. "Organic Farming as an Innovative Farming System Development Model toward Sustainable Agriculture in Bali," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Setiawan Priatmoko & Moaaz Kabil & Yitno Purwoko & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Rethinking Sustainable Community-Based Tourism: A Villager’s Point of View and Case Study in Pampang Village, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Waridin & Atika Dzulkhijiana & Izza Mafruhah, 2018. "Community empowerment in rural infrastructure development program," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 10(1), pages 8-14, April.
    4. Incham Manggat & Rajwani Zain & Zakiyah Jamaluddin, 2018. "The Impact of Infrastructure Development on Rural Communities: A Literature Review," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 647-658, January.
    5. He Zhu & Jiaming Liu & Zongcai Wei & Weiheng Li & Lei Wang, 2017. "Residents’ Attitudes towards Sustainable Tourism Development in a Historical-Cultural Village: Influence of Perceived Impacts, Sense of Place and Tourism Development Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Irwan Effendi & Leni Sepri Yandi & Indah Listiana, 2019. "Effect of infrastructure development in the program of simultaneous movement for village development on economic growth," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(6), pages 25-30, October.
    7. Mustajab Hakim & Abdul Hakim & Luchman Hakim & Nuddin Harahab, 2018. "Coastal Tourism Management Model toward Developing Independent Tourist Village in Central Lombok District, Indonesia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, November.
    8. I Wayan Budiasa, 2014. "Organic Farming as an Innovative Farming System Development Model toward Sustainable Agriculture in Bali," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 11(1), pages 65-75, June.
    9. Jorge Alexander Mora & Olga Yamova & Taira Murtuzalieva, 2019. "Community-Based Tourism as the Leading Approach to the Rural Development," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Wadim Strielkowski (ed.), Sustainable Leadership for Entrepreneurs and Academics, pages 503-510, Springer.
    10. Isabel del Arco & Anabel Ramos-Pla & Gabriel Zsembinszki & Alvaro de Gracia & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Implementing SDGs to a Sustainable Rural Village Development from Community Empowerment: Linking Energy, Education, Innovation, and Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Park, Albert & Wang, Sangui, 2010. "Community-based development and poverty alleviation: An evaluation of China's poor village investment program," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(9-10), pages 790-799, October.
    12. Chunliu Gao & Li Cheng & Javed Iqbal & Deqiang Cheng, 2019. "An Integrated Rural Development Mode Based on a Tourism-Oriented Approach: Exploring the Beautiful Village Project in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Asnawi Manaf & Novia Purbasari & Maya Damayanti & Nanda Aprilia & Winny Astuti, 2018. "Community-Based Rural Tourism in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: How Does It Work Sustainably? Lessons Learned from Nglanggeran Tourism Village, Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Gangmin Weng & Yue Pan & Jianpu Li, 2021. "Study on the Influencing Factors and Acting Path of the Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism Based on EEAM-ISM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Seweryn Zielinski & Yoonjeong Jeong & Seong-il Kim & Celene B. Milanés, 2020. "Why Community-Based Tourism and Rural Tourism in Developing and Developed Nations are Treated Differently? A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Waridin Waridin & Atika Dzulkhijiana & Izza Mafruhah, 2018. "Community empowerment in rural infrastructure development program," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 10(1), pages 8-14.
    17. Sri Maryati & Tommy Firman & An Nisaa’ Siti Humaira & Yovita Tisarda Febriani, 2020. "Benefit Distribution of Community-Based Infrastructure: Agricultural Roads in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Yaqiu Liu & Jian Liu & Can Guo & Tingting Zhang & Ailing Wang & Xinyang Yu, 2021. "Identification of Villages’ Development Types Using a Comprehensive Natural–Socioeconomic Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Setiawan Priatmoko & Moaaz Kabil & Yitno Purwoko & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Rethinking Sustainable Community-Based Tourism: A Villager’s Point of View and Case Study in Pampang Village, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Dan Mihnea Diaconescu & Remus Moraru & Gabriela Stanciulescu, 2016. "Considerations on Gastronomic Tourism as a Component of Sustainable Local Development," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(S10), pages 999-999, November.
    3. I Gusti Ayu Purnamawati & Ferry Jie & Saarce Elsye Hatane, 2022. "Cultural Change Shapes the Sustainable Development of Religious Ecotourism Villages in Bali, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Stefanie Zárate-Altamirano & Deisy Coromoto Rebolledo-López & Eduardo Parra-López, 2022. "Community Tourism Strategic Planning—Convergent Model Proposal as Applied to a Municipality in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Wookhyun An & Silverio Alarcón, 2020. "How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Innovations in Agritourism: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Giacomo Falchetta & Nicolò Stevanato & Magda Moner-Girona & Davide Mazzoni & Emanuela Colombo & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "M-LED: Multi-sectoral Latent Electricity Demand Assessment for Energy Access Planning," Working Papers 2020.09, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    8. Genqiang Lei & Xiaohong Huang & Penghui Xi, 2016. "The impact of transfer payments on urban-rural income gap: based on fuzzy RD analysis of China’s midwestern county data," China Finance and Economic Review, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Milena Nedeljković Knežević & Marko D. Petrović & Slađana Nedeljković & Maja Mijatov & Milan M. Radovanović & Mirjana Gajić & Miroslav Škoda, 2019. "Changes in Traditional Activities of Industrial Area toward Sustainable Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Cornelius O. Okorie & Christopha C. Arua & Felix M. Nwankwo, 2023. "Nigerian State and Rent-Dependent Economy: An Exposition of Vision 2020 Policy Strategies for Future Sustainable Development," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(3), pages 1330-1345, March.
    11. Qiulin Chen & Bo Wang & Gang Fu, 2023. "Impact of Village Governance Quality on the Satisfaction of Farmers’ Life Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Fresenbet Zeleke & Girma T. Kassie & Jema Haji & Belaineh Legesse, 2021. "Would Market Sheds Improve Market Participation and Earnings of Small Ruminant Keepers? Evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 470-485, June.
    13. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    14. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    15. Mano, Yukichi & Akoten, John & Yoshino, Yutaka & Sonobe, Tetsushi, 2014. "Teaching KAIZEN to small business owners: An experiment in a metalworking cluster in Nairobi," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 25-42.
    16. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    17. Setiawan Priatmoko & Moaaz Kabil & Ali Akaak & Zoltán Lakner & Csaba Gyuricza & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Understanding the Complexity of Rural Tourism Business: Scholarly Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Abdulrahman Altassan, 2023. "Sustainability of Heritage Villages through Eco-Tourism Investment (Case Study: Al-Khabra Village, Saudi Arabia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    19. María Andrade & Iria Caamaño-Franco, 2018. "Theoretical and Methodological Model for the Study of Social Perception of the Impact of Industrial Tourism on Local Development," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-31, October.
    20. Mahmoud Alreahi & Zoltán Bujdosó & Lóránt Dénes Dávid & Balázs Gyenge, 2023. "Green Supply Chain Management in Hotel Industry: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:11:p:1903-:d:970621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.