IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i4p78-d273509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Search of Employee Perspective: Understanding How Lithuanian Companies Use Employees Representatives in the Adoption of Company’s Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Remigijus Civinskas

    (Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Political Sciences and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University, 23-604 V. Putvinskio str., 44243 Kaunas, Lithuania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jaroslav Dvorak

    (Department of Public Administration and Political Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Klaipeda University, H. Manto 84, 92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The article analyzes the factors of the use of employees’ representatives in the adoption of a company’s decision in Lithuanian companies. The methodology of current research is based upon the data collected through a quantitative expert-based survey and qualitative interviews with representatives of trade unions. The survey method has been used in order to obtain the data from the experts involved in the field of industrial relations in Lithuania. The interviews with representatives of trade unions gives a possibility to look at how people perceive the employee participation methods proposed by the employers, what benefits they see in their use and what policy does their organization or collective apply towards these means (trade unions etc.). According to the research findings, the employee’s participation is called a social dialogue at the company level. The results of the current research in favor evaluate the constructive cooperation between the employee representatives and employers (when this does not encompass important areas of industrial relations (i.e., collective agreements, negotiations regarding wages, employment conditions etc.)).

Suggested Citation

  • Remigijus Civinskas & Jaroslav Dvorak, 2019. "In Search of Employee Perspective: Understanding How Lithuanian Companies Use Employees Representatives in the Adoption of Company’s Decisions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:78-:d:273509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/4/78/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/4/78/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Della Torre, Edoardo, 2019. "Collective voice mechanisms, HRM practices and organizational performance in Italian manufacturing firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 398-410.
    2. Hyman, Richard, 2018. "What future for industrial relations in Europe?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 89229, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Mick Marchington & Jane Suter, 2013. "Where Informality Really Matters: Patterns of Employee Involvement and Participation (EIP) in a Non-Union Firm," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 284-313, January.
    4. Machado Ricardo B., 2016. "The Determinants of Employee Ownership Plan Implementation in EU Countries – the Quest for Economic Democracy: a First Look at the Evidence," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 49(2), pages 94-107, May.
    5. Paul J Gollan & Ying Xu, 2015. "Re-engagement with the employee participation debate: beyond the case of contested and captured terrain," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Michael Barry & Adrian Wilkinson, 2016. "Pro-Social or Pro-Management? A Critique of the Conception of Employee Voice as a Pro-Social Behaviour within Organizational Behaviour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 261-284, June.
    7. Civinskas Remigijus & Dvorak Jaroslav, 2017. "New social cooperation model in service oriented economy: the case of employee financial participation in the Baltic states," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 9(3), pages 37-50, September.
    8. Kozłowski Maciej, 2014. "The Relationship Between Workers’ Financial Participation in Companies and Economic Results," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunfeng Sun & Hao Yang & Chongyang Qian & Yifeng Jiang & Xiaowei Luo & Xiang Wu, 2022. "Voice Endorsement and Employee Safety Voice Behavior in Construction Projects: The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Laura Good & Rae Cooper, 2016. "‘But It's Your Job To Be Friendly’: Employees Coping With and Contesting Sexual Harassment from Customers in the Service Sector," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 447-469, September.
    3. Orestis Papadopoulos & Gregoris Ioannou, 2023. "Working in hospitality and catering in Greece and the UK: Do trade union membership and collective bargaining still matter?," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(2), pages 105-122, June.
    4. Xia Tiantian & Zhang Zhenduo & Xiao Huan & Xiu Jing & Jia Wentong, 2021. "The Curvilinear Relationship Between Job Control and Voice: Role of Emotional Resistance to Change and Supervisor Developmental Feedback," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    5. Chantziaras, Antonios & Dedoulis, Emmanouil & Leventis, Stergios, 2020. "The impact of labor unionization on monitoring costs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 288-307.
    6. Komal Khalid & Samina Nawab, 2018. "Employee Participation and Employee Retention in View of Compensation," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    7. Arthur Corazza, 2020. "Power, interest and insecurity: A comparative analysis of workplace dualization and inclusion in Europe," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 153, European Institute, LSE.
    8. Martin Krzywdzinski, 2017. "Accounting for Cross-Country Differences in Employee Involvement Practices: Comparative Case Studies in Germany, Brazil and China," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 321-346, June.
    9. Michael Barry & Adrian Wilkinson, 2016. "Pro-Social or Pro-Management? A Critique of the Conception of Employee Voice as a Pro-Social Behaviour within Organizational Behaviour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 261-284, June.
    10. Bruce Kaufman, 2014. "Explaining Breadth and Depth of Employee Voice across Firms: A Voice Factor Demand Model," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 296-319, September.
    11. George Kandathil & Jerome Joseph, 2019. "Normative Underpinnings of Direct Employee Participation Studies and Implications for Developing Ethical Reflexivity: A Multidisciplinary Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 685-697, July.
    12. Yanhan Zhu & Jiang Wu, 0. "Does charismatic leadership encourage or suppress follower voice? The moderating role of challenge–hindrance stressors," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-26.
    13. Dirk De Clercq & Tasneem Fatima & Sadia Jahanzeb, 2021. "Ingratiating with Despotic Leaders to Gain Status: The Role of Power Distance Orientation and Self-enhancement Motive," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 157-174, June.
    14. Jaren Haber, 2016. "Institutionalized Involvement: Teams and Stress in 1990s U.S. Steel," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 632-661, October.
    15. Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Christian Dyrlund, 2019. "The terms of “becoming empowered”: How ascriptions and negotiations of employee identities shape the outcomes of workplace voice activities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    16. Pradeepa Dahanayake & Christopher Selvarajah & Diana Rajendran, 2023. "Capturing the missing voices: A ‘fair go’ for sexual and gender minority employees in Australian workplaces," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 711-731, November.
    17. Raffaella Valsecchi & Neil Anderson & Maria Elisavet Balta & John Harrison, 2023. "Managing Health and Well-Being in SMEs through an Adviceline: A Typology of Managerial Behaviours," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 449-466, April.
    18. Giles Hirst & Gillian Yeo & Nicole Celestine & Shen-Yang (Sonya) Lin & Alex Richardson, 2020. "It’s not just action but also about reflection: Taking stock of agency research to develop a future research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 376-401, August.
    19. James Walker & Peder Greve & Geoff Wood & Peter Miskell, 2019. "Because you're worth it? Determinants of Vice Chancellor pay in the UK," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 450-467, November.
    20. Krzywdzinski, Martin, 2017. "Accounting for Cross-Country Differences in Employee Involvement Practices: Comparative Case Studies in Germany, Brazil and China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 321-346.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:78-:d:273509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.