IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i2p26-d1038536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Subjective Financial Firm Performance Have an Inverted U-Shape? Evidence from Southeast European SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Šlogar

    (Faculty of International Business and Economics, Libertas International University, Trg John F. Kennedy 6B, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Bojan Morić Milovanović

    (Faculty of International Business and Economics, Libertas International University, Trg John F. Kennedy 6B, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Stella Hrvatin

    (Faculty of International Business and Economics, Libertas International University, Trg John F. Kennedy 6B, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Many academic studies have focused on exploring various interactions between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and firm performance, where, in general, the findings confirmed their existence to be of positive character. However, many authors indicated a need to further test the possibilities concerning the nonlinearity between EO and firm performance. Moreover, since many research studies on this topic have been conducted in developed countries, there is still a need for such studies in developing countries, especially in the region of southeast Europe. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the existence of nonlinearity between EO and subjective financial performance among SMEs in southeastern European countries. Data was collected from decisionmakers of the 963 SMEs operating in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, and North Macedonia. Proposed hypotheses were tested using hierarchical linear regression analysis. Research results confirmed existence of the positive direct relationship EO has on financial performance, including the positive effects on sales growth and profit-to-sales ratio. On the other hand, results have not confirmed existence of nonlinearity effects that EO has on financial performance, sales growth, nor on the profit-to-sales ratio. In other words, the observed relationship does not exhibit inversed U-shape characteristics among southeast European SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Šlogar & Bojan Morić Milovanović & Stella Hrvatin, 2023. "Does the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Subjective Financial Firm Performance Have an Inverted U-Shape? Evidence from Southeast European SMEs," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:26-:d:1038536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongfeng Su & En Xie & Dong Wang, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Managerial Networking, and New Venture Performance in China," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 228-248, January.
    2. Talis Putnins & Arnis Sauka, 2020. "Why does entrepreneurial orientation affect company performance?," Published Paper Series 2020-6, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    3. Wiklund, Johan & Shepherd, Dean, 2005. "Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 71-91, January.
    4. Morgan, Todd & Anokhin, Sergey Alexander, 2020. "The joint impact of entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation in new product development: Studying firm and environmental contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 129-138.
    5. Jelle Schepers & Wim Voordeckers & Tensie Steijvers & Eddy Laveren, 2014. "The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: the moderating role of socioemotional wealth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 39-55, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boris Urban & Fikile Kanguwe, 2024. "Organisational configurations explaining the entrepreneurial orientation–performance–environment relationship: a focus on bricolage capability, organisational identity and absorptive capacity," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Sami Özcan & Murat Serçemeli & Ali Kemal Çelik, 2024. "Analyzing the Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic on the Financial Performance of Turkish Listed Companies on Borsa Istanbul using the Entropy-based Grey Relational Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 109-124, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hernández-Perlines, Felipe & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo E., 2021. "Entrepreneurial orientation, concern for socioemotional wealth preservation, and family firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 197-208.
    2. Katharina Fellnhofer & Kaisu Puumalainen & Helena Sjögrén, 0. "Entrepreneurial orientation in work groups – effects of individuals and group characteristics," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-37.
    3. Ehsan Fansuree Surin & Oswald Timothy Edward & Sayuthi Shaaran & Rohana Ngah, 2023. "Understanding Entrepreneurial Orientation based Research: A Proposed New Theoretical Framework," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 23-35.
    4. Katharina Fellnhofer & Kaisu Puumalainen & Helena Sjögrén, 2017. "Entrepreneurial orientation in work groups – effects of individuals and group characteristics," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 427-463, June.
    5. Anis Khedhaouria & Călin Gurău & Olivier Torrès, 2015. "Creativity, self-efficacy, and small-firm performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 485-504, March.
    6. Du, Yunzhou & Kim, Phillip H., 2021. "One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    7. Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Manuel Alejandro Ibarra Cisneros, 2017. "Analysis of the moderating effect of entrepreneurial orientation on the influence of social responsibility on the performance of Mexican family companies," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1408209-140, January.
    8. Jean-Marie Courrent & Sonia Chassé & Waleed Omri, 2018. "Do Entrepreneurial SMEs Perform Better Because They are More Responsible?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 317-336, December.
    9. Unai Arzubiaga & Amaia Maseda & Txomin Iturralde, 2019. "Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: New drivers and the moderating role of the strategic involvement of the board," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(1), pages 128-152, February.
    10. Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Nina Rung-Hoch, 2017. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation in Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Jelle Schepers & Wim Voordeckers & Tensie Steijvers & Eddy Laveren, 2020. "Long-Term Orientation as a Resource for Entrepreneurial Orientation in Private Family Firms: The Need for Participative Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Jelle Schepers & Wim Voordeckers & Tensie Steijvers & Eddy Laveren, 2021. "Entrepreneurial intention-action gap in family firms: bifurcation bias and the board of directors as an economizing mechanism," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 451-475, September.
    13. Unai Arzubiaga & Txomin Iturralde & Amaia Maseda & Josip Kotlar, 2018. "Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in family SMEs: the moderating effects of family, women, and strategic involvement in the board of directors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 217-244, March.
    14. Lixin Sheng & Jibao Gu & Jianlin Wu, 2023. "How does entrepreneurial orientation influence firm performance? The roles of corporate social responsibility and institutional environments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2021-2036, July.
    15. Muhammad Farrukh & Fanchen Meng & Muhammad Sajid & Imran Shahzad, 2020. "Does strategic fit matter in measuring organizational performance? An empirical analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1800-1808, July.
    16. Linan Lei & Xiaobo Wu & Yanan Fu, 2019. "Effects of Sustainability and Technology Orientations on Firm Growth: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    18. Chahal, Hardeep & Gupta, Mahesh & Lonial, Subhash & Raina, Swati, 2019. "Operational flexibility-entrepreneurial orientation relationship: Effects and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 154-167.
    19. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    20. Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2009. "Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 319-340, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:26-:d:1038536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.