IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fis/journl/250403.html

The Impact of European Union's Free Trade Agreements on Türkiye’s Foreign Trade: Trade Diversion

Author

Listed:
  • Cüneyt ÇATUK

Abstract

This study investigates the trade diversion effects stemming from the European Union’s (EU) Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with third countries—particularly Canada and Algeria—on Türkiye’s import structure. As a non-EU member bound by the EU–Türkiye Customs Union, Türkiye is compelled to align with the Common External Tariff but is systematically excluded from the EU’s bilateral trade negotiations. This institutional asymmetry creates the potential for both direct and indirect trade diversion, whereby third-country exporters route goods through the EU to exploit tariff advantages. Using detailed trade data from 2004 to 2023 and disaggregated product-level analysis across HS chapters (notably Chapters 10, 27, 28, 29, 72, 79, and 84), this study demonstrates that trade diversion is both sector-specific and tariff-sensitive. Empirical findings show strong diversionary patterns in energy-related and agricultural commodities, whereas capital goods and chemical sectors show limited or no diversion. The analysis is supported by a comparative assessment of customs duty structures and trade flows between Türkiye, Canada, and Algeria vis-à -vis the EU. Panel gravity model estimations using Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) reveal statistically significant diversion effects, confirming that Türkiye’s exclusion from the EU FTAs with Canada and Algeria has a measurable negative impact on direct import volumes. These econometric results substantiate the descriptive findings and provide robust evidence for policy intervention. The results corroborate the theoretical predictions of Vinerian trade theory and are consistent with existing empirical literature on preferential trade agreements. The study contributes to the broader discourse by offering micro-level evidence from a non-FTA signatory state embedded in a customs union framework. Policy recommendations are offered to mitigate asymmetries in trade governance and to enhance Türkiye’s strategic agency in global commerce.

Suggested Citation

  • Cüneyt ÇATUK, 2025. "The Impact of European Union's Free Trade Agreements on Türkiye’s Foreign Trade: Trade Diversion," Fiscaoeconomia, Tubitak Ulakbim JournalPark (Dergipark), issue 4.
    • Handle: RePEc:fis:journl:250403
    DOI: 10.25295/fsecon.1677273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4778420
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.25295/fsecon.1677273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ram Dayal & Neeru Dayal, 1977. "Trade creation and trade diversion: New concepts, new methods of measurement," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 113(1), pages 125-169, March.
    2. Harry G. Johnson, 1965. "An Economic Theory of Protectionism, Tariff Bargaining, and the Formation of Customs Unions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(3), pages 256-256.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saggi, Kamal & Wong, Woan Foong & Yildiz, Halis Murat, 2017. "Preferential Trade Agreements and Rules of the Multilateral Trading System," MPRA Paper 76330, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Fronczek Małgorzata, 2024. "Restrictions applied by WTO countries in international trade in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 60(3), pages 173-185.
    3. John Tressler, 1978. "Political Goods and Trade Theory," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 22(1), pages 51-59, March.
    4. Lucian Cernat, 2001. "ASSESSING REGIONAL TRADE ARRANGEMENTS: ARE SOUTH–SOUTH RTAs MORE TRADE DIVERTING?," International Trade 0109001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Panagariya, A., 1997. "Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 471-489, December.
    6. Breton, Albert & Salmon, Pierre, 2001. "External effects of domestic regulations: comparing internal and international barriers to trade," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 135-155, June.
    7. Kamal Saggi & Woan Foong Wong & Halis Murat Yildiz, 2022. "The role of non‐discrimination in a world of discriminatory preferential trade agreements," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(1), pages 174-212, February.
    8. Paul Wonnacott & Ronald J. Wonnacott, 1982. "Free Trade between the United States and Canada: Fifteen Years Later," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 8(s1), pages 412-427, October.
    9. Jacques Fontanel, 1999. "L'entreprise globale dans l'économie de marché," Post-Print hal-03328184, HAL.
    10. Barbara Dluhosch & Nikolai Ziegler, 2011. "The paradox of weakness in the politics of trade integration," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 325-354, December.
    11. Li, Chunding & Whalley, John, 2014. "China's potential future growth and gains from trade policy bargaining: Some numerical simulation results," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 65-78.
    12. Foroutan, Faezeh & Pritchett, Lant, 1993. "Intra-sub-Saharan African Trade: Is It Too Little?," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 2(1), pages 74-105, May.
    13. Hern√°n Vallejo, 2004. "Some Worrying Theoretical Consequences Of The Non-Linear Relationship Between The Economic Size Of Preferential Trade Agreements And Welfare," Documentos CEDE 3518, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    14. Bouët, Antoine & Laborde Debucquet, David, 2017. "Why is the Doha Development agenda failing? And what can be done? A computable general equilibrium-game theoretical approach," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine; Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 3, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Ludema, Rodney D. & Mayda, Anna Maria, 2009. "Do countries free ride on MFN?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 137-150, April.
    16. Soumyananda Dinda, 2014. "China integrates Asia with the world: an empirical study," Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 70-89, May.
    17. Guglielmo Caporale & Christophe Rault & Robert Sova & Anamaria Sova, 2009. "On the bilateral trade effects of free trade agreements between the EU-15 and the CEEC-4 countries," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(3), pages 573-573, October.
    18. de Melo, Jaime & Montenegro, Claudio & Panagariya, Arvind, 1992. "Regional integration, old and new," Policy Research Working Paper Series 985, The World Bank.
    19. Paul Wonnacott & Ronald J. Wonnacott, 2011. "The Economic Case for Reciprocal Trade Negotiations: Gains from Both Imports and Exports," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Kym Anderson & Rod Tyers, 1988. "Agricultural Protection Growth in Advanced and Newly Industrialized Countries," Adelaide Economics Working Papers 1988-08, Adelaide University, School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fis:journl:250403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emre Atsan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dergipark.org.tr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.