IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejssjr/90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possibilities for Modernization of Conciliation Board Procedures in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe - Online Dispute Resolution and Electronic Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Balázs Hohmann

    (J .D. Assistant Lecturer, University of Pécs (Hungary), Faculty of Law, President, Association of Hungarian PhD and DLA Students, Department of Jurisprudence (Budapest, Hungary), Board Member, Conciliation Board of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in)

Abstract

Conciliation bodies are the main European forums for alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes, providing an institutionalized opportunity to remedy consumer infringement cases quickly, cheaply and efficiently. The institution has excellent dispute resolution efficiency not only in Hungary, but also at the international level, which greatly contributes to the enforcement of the consumer protection legislation of the countries concerned. The scientific examination of the work of the bodies and the legislation related to them, the number of domestic and international scientific works resulting from them are modest, while the efficient operation of the bodies depends not only on practical and legal factors, but also on the theoretical basis. Although legislative reforms in this area have led to a number of innovations and modernizations, they have left untouched a number of theoretical and practical issues that also pose significant problems in law enforcement, such as the satisfactory settlement of cross-border disputes, electronic communication and even communication, that it is possible to involve artificial intelligence, other software solutions in decision-making or online dispute resolution within the framework of the procedure. Applied research on the operation of conciliation bodies covered bodies and bodies in Hungary, Romania and Slovakia. Due to the large number of consumer legal relations, the significance of these research results in the national economy cannot be considered negligible either. The research supported by the ÚNKP-20-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund.

Suggested Citation

  • Balázs Hohmann, 2021. "Possibilities for Modernization of Conciliation Board Procedures in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe - Online Dispute Resolution and Electronic Communication," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, January -.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejssjr:90
    DOI: 10.26417/554xup42d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejss/article/view/5246
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejss_v4_i1_21/Hohmann.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/554xup42d?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaus krippendorff, 2004. "Measuring the Reliability of Qualitative Text Analysis Data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 787-800, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia Arena & Simona Catuogno & Nicola Moscariello, 2021. "The unusual debate on non-GAAP reporting in the current standard practice. The lens of corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 655-684, September.
    2. Juan Molero & Isabel Rodríguez-Tejedo, 2010. "An index of political support for decentralization: the Spanish case," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 50-79, March.
    3. Somendra Narayan & Jatinder S. Sidhu & Henk W. Volberda, 2021. "From Attention to Action: The Influence of Cognitive and Ideological Diversity in Top Management Teams on Business Model Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(8), pages 2082-2110, December.
    4. Alexandre Rodrigues da Silva & Claudia Brito Silva Cirani & Fernando Antonio Ribeiro Serra & Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende da Costa & Isabel Cristina Scafuto & Roberto Lima Ruas & Marcos Rogério , 2023. "Determining Factors on Green Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study in Brazilian Agribusiness Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Zarr, Siegalit & Carone, Nicola & Gartrell, Nanette & Koh, Audrey & Bos, Henny, 2022. "Concerns of emerging adults who were born and raised in planned lesbian-parent families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Leyla Yılmaz Fındık & Şefika Şule Erçetin, 2023. "How Do Universities in Türkiye Integrate Sustainable Development Goals into Their Strategies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Brennan, Michael & Rondón-Sulbarán, Janeet, 2019. "Transdisciplinary research: Exploring impact, knowledge and quality in the early stages of a sustainable development project," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 481-491.
    8. Andreas Armborst, 2017. "Thematic Proximity in Content Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    9. Miguel Ángel Ríos-Martín & José Antonio Folgado-Fernández & Pedro R. Palos-Sánchez & Paula Castejón-Jiménez, 2019. "The Impact of the Environmental Quality of Online Feedback and Satisfaction When Exploring the Critical Factors for Luxury Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Vasja Roblek & Oshane Thorpe & Mirjana Pejic Bach & Andrej Jerman & Maja Meško, 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Ben Arfi, Wissal & Hikkerova, Lubica & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2018. "External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 210-220.
    12. Badar Alshabibi & Shanmuga Pria & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "Audit Committees and COVID-19-Related Disclosure Tone: Evidence from Oman," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Tiziana Marinaci & Claudio Russo & Giulia Savarese & Giovanna Stornaiuolo & Filomena Faiella & Luna Carpinelli & Marco Navarra & Giuseppina Marsico & Monica Mollo, 2023. "An Inclusive Workplace Approach to Disability through Assistive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Cartwright, Joanna & McCormick, Helen & Warnaby, Gary, 2016. "Consumers' emotional responses to the Christmas TV advertising of four retail brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 82-91.
    15. Sergio Barile & Mara Grimaldi & Francesca Loia & Carlo Alessandro Sirianni, 2020. "Technology, Value Co-Creation and Innovation in Service Ecosystems: Toward Sustainable Co-Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    16. Javid Iqbal & Khalid Riaz, 2022. "Predicting future financial performance of banks from management’s tone in the textual disclosures," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2691-2721, August.
    17. Manita, Riadh & Elommal, Najoua & Baudier, Patricia & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2020. "The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    18. Fletcher-Brown, Judith & Pereira, Vijay & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W., 2018. "Health marketing in an emerging market: The critical role of signaling theory in breast cancer awareness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 416-434.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejssjr:90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.