IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/70.html

The Effect of Perceived Interest and Prior Knowledge on L2 Reading Comprehension via Several Assessment Methods in a Higher Education Context

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Cristina Lahuerta Martínez

    (University of Oviedo, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to examine the effect of perceived interest and prior knowledge on EFL reading comprehension. Participants were 227 undergraduates with advanced competence in English. With respect to the method, participants had to read a 450-word text entitled Wales. After that, they had to complete a Perceived Interest Questionnaire (PIQ), which consisted of 9 items and two assessment tasks: a written recall and a multiple choice task. The results of our study show the significant effect of perceived interest and prior knowledge on L2 reading comprehension. Thus, comprehension assessed via written recall and multiple choice questions had higher scores when readers read texts related to their interests. Besides, prior knowledge had a positive effect on the reader’s comprehension irrespective of the assessment method used. This study concludes that different assessment tasks may be crucial factors that affect the relationship between factors like interest and prior knowledge, and L2 reading comprehension.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Cristina Lahuerta Martínez, 2019. "The Effect of Perceived Interest and Prior Knowledge on L2 Reading Comprehension via Several Assessment Methods in a Higher Education Context," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:70
    DOI: 10.26417/ejls-2019.v5i1-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejls_v5_i2_19/Martinez.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejls_v5_i2_19/Martinez.html
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejls-2019.v5i1-194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fink, A. & Kosecoff, J. & Chassin, M. & Brook, R.H., 1984. "Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(9), pages 979-983.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shannon Li & Anne Honey & Francesca Coniglio & Peter Schaecken, 2022. "Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Dana Hübelová & Martina Kuncová & Hana Vojáčková & Jitka Coufalová & Alice Kozumplíková & Francois Stefanus Lategan & Beatrice-Elena Chromková Manea, 2021. "Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. West, Allison & Duggan, Anne K. & Gruss, Kelsey & Minkovitz, Cynthia S., 2018. "Creating a measurement framework for service coordination in maternal and early childhood home visiting: An evidence-informed, expert process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 289-297.
    4. Sundmacher, Leonie & Fischbach, Diana & Schuettig, Wiebke & Naumann, Christoph & Augustin, Uta & Faisst, Cristina, 2015. "Which hospitalisations are ambulatory care-sensitive, to what degree, and how could the rates be reduced? Results of a group consensus study in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(11), pages 1415-1423.
    5. Gabel, Matthew J. & Shipan, Charles R., 2004. "A social choice approach to expert consensus panels," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 543-564, May.
    6. Mitra Hannani & Marc Bascompta & Mojtaba Gerami Sabzevar & Hesam Dehghani & Ali Asghar Khajevandi, 2023. "Causal Analysis of Safety Risk Perception of Iranian Coal Mining Workers Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Seungryong Choi & Keuntae Cho, 2025. "A Scenario-Based Approach to Using Electric Vehicle Batteries in Virtual Power Plants: Insights from Environmental, Social, and Governance and Monte Carlo Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-34, April.
    8. Inmaculada Serrano & Mercedes Fernández & Eva Bajo Marcos, 2024. "Building a Set of Indicators to Assess Migrant Children's Integration in Europe: A Co-Creation Approach," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(6), pages 2389-2417, December.
    9. Sarah G. McCarthy & Richard R. Rushforth, 2025. "Identifying Barriers to Implementation of Regenerative Agricultural Solutions Through Convergence Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0080671 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Dee Warmath & Katrina Borowiec & Ashley B. LeBaron-Black & Gary Mottola & Miranda Reiter & Kurt Schindler & Joshua Caraballo, 2026. "Improving Measurement in the Study of Consumer Finance: Consensus from the NEFE Scale Validation Project," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 234-244, June.
    12. Otto H. Swank & Bauke Visser, 2009. "Decision Making and Learning in a Globalizing World," Economics Working Papers ECO2009/20, European University Institute.
    13. Marzieh Fallah & Lanndon Ocampo, 2021. "The use of the Delphi method with non-parametric analysis for identifying sustainability criteria and indicators in evaluating ecotourism management: the case of Penang National Park (Malaysia)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 45-62, March.
    14. Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron & Hélène Fron Chabouis & Pierre Durieux & Jean-Pierre Attal & Michèle Muller-Bolla & Frédéric Courson, 2013. "Development of a Core Set of Outcomes for Randomized Controlled Trials with Multiple Outcomes – Example of Pulp Treatments of Primary Teeth for Extensive Decay in Children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    15. Ravonne A. Green, 2014. "The Delphi Technique in Educational Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.
    16. Helen Ross & C. Emdad Haque & Fikret Berkes, 2024. "Transmission of knowledge and social learning for disaster risk reduction and building resilience: A Delphi study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 1525-1537, April.
    17. Sharon Barak & Tzlil Rabinovitz & Achinoam Ben Akiva-Maliniak & Rony Schenker & Lian Meiry & Riki Tesler, 2022. "An Individually Tailored Program to Increase Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors among the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Justus N Agumba, 2015. "Validating and Identifying Health and Safety Performance Improvement Indicators: Experience of Using Delphi Technique," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 14-22.
    19. Sambou, Césarine & Decroix, Charlotte & Martin-Fernandez, Judith & Cambon, Linda & Alla, François, 2025. "Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Shani, Segev & Siebzehner, Miriam Ines & Luxenburg, Osnat & Shemer, Joshua, 2000. "Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 169-185, December.
    21. Sarvari, Hadi & Baghbaderani, Alireza Babaie & Chan, Daniel W.M. & Beer, Michael, 2024. "Determining the significant contributing factors to the occurrence of human errors in the urban construction projects: A Delphi-SWARA study approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mentisia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mentisia.org/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.