IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v108y2025ics0149718924001186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Sambou, Césarine
  • Decroix, Charlotte
  • Martin-Fernandez, Judith
  • Cambon, Linda
  • Alla, François

Abstract

The concept of viable validity was first defined in 2010 within the framework of the integrative validity model. The concept has continued to evolve in the intervening years, and the purpose of this systematic scoping review is to describe and analyze the ways in which it has been deployed and appropriated by various research traditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sambou, Césarine & Decroix, Charlotte & Martin-Fernandez, Judith & Cambon, Linda & Alla, François, 2025. "Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001186
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001186
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel Angel & Gomez, Laura E., 2011. "Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 273-282, August.
    2. Fink, A. & Kosecoff, J. & Chassin, M. & Brook, R.H., 1984. "Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(9), pages 979-983.
    3. Chen, Huey T., 2010. "The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: A new perspective for program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 205-214, August.
    4. Urban, Jennifer Brown & Hargraves, Monica & Trochim, William M., 2014. "Evolutionary Evaluation: Implications for evaluators, researchers, practitioners, funders and the evidence-based program mandate," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 127-139.
    5. Chen, Huey T. & Yip, Fuyuen & Lavonas, Eric J. & Iqbal, Shahed & Turner, Nannette & Cobb, Bobby & Garbe, Paul, 2014. "Using the exhibited generalization approach to evaluate a carbon monoxide alarm ordinance," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 35-44.
    6. Inrig, Stephen J. & Higashi, Robin T. & Tiro, Jasmin A. & Argenbright, Keith E. & Lee, Simon J. Craddock, 2017. "Assessing local capacity to expand rural breast cancer screening and patient navigation: An iterative mixed-method tool," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 113-124.
    7. Riches, Brian R. & Benavides, Celina M. & Dubon, Valeska X., 2020. "Development of a fostering purpose intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Archibald, Thomas, 2015. "“They Just Know”: The epistemological politics of “evidence-based” non-formal education," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 137-148.
    2. Chen, Huey T., 2016. "Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 109-118.
    3. Riches, Brian R. & Benavides, Celina M. & Dubon, Valeska X., 2020. "Development of a fostering purpose intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Shannon Li & Anne Honey & Francesca Coniglio & Peter Schaecken, 2022. "Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Urban, Jennifer Brown & Hargraves, Monica & Trochim, William M., 2014. "Evolutionary Evaluation: Implications for evaluators, researchers, practitioners, funders and the evidence-based program mandate," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 127-139.
    6. Dana Hübelová & Martina Kuncová & Hana Vojáčková & Jitka Coufalová & Alice Kozumplíková & Francois Stefanus Lategan & Beatrice-Elena Chromková Manea, 2021. "Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Pearl Anne Ante-Testard & Francois Rerolle & Anna T. Nguyen & Sania Ashraf & Sarker Masud Parvez & Abu Mohammed Naser & Tarik Benmarhnia & Mahbubur Rahman & Stephen P. Luby & Jade Benjamin-Chung & Ben, 2024. "WASH interventions and child diarrhea at the interface of climate and socioeconomic position in Bangladesh," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. West, Allison & Duggan, Anne K. & Gruss, Kelsey & Minkovitz, Cynthia S., 2018. "Creating a measurement framework for service coordination in maternal and early childhood home visiting: An evidence-informed, expert process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 289-297.
    9. Sundmacher, Leonie & Fischbach, Diana & Schuettig, Wiebke & Naumann, Christoph & Augustin, Uta & Faisst, Cristina, 2015. "Which hospitalisations are ambulatory care-sensitive, to what degree, and how could the rates be reduced? Results of a group consensus study in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(11), pages 1415-1423.
    10. Jos H M van Loon & Remco Mostert, 2020. "Guidelines in Supporting People with Intellectual Disabilities.It’s all About Values," Global Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(1), pages 13-17, October.
    11. Gabel, Matthew J. & Shipan, Charles R., 2004. "A social choice approach to expert consensus panels," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 543-564, May.
    12. Mitra Hannani & Marc Bascompta & Mojtaba Gerami Sabzevar & Hesam Dehghani & Ali Asghar Khajevandi, 2023. "Causal Analysis of Safety Risk Perception of Iranian Coal Mining Workers Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Seungryong Choi & Keuntae Cho, 2025. "A Scenario-Based Approach to Using Electric Vehicle Batteries in Virtual Power Plants: Insights from Environmental, Social, and Governance and Monte Carlo Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-34, April.
    14. Robert L. Schalock & Ruth Luckasson & Karrie A. Shogren, 2020. "Going beyond Environment to Context: Leveraging the Power of Context to Produce Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Gómez, Laura E. & Verdugo, Miguel Ángel & Arias, Benito & Navas, Patricia & Schalock, Robert L., 2013. "The development and use of Provider Profiles at the organizational and systems level," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 17-26.
    16. Inmaculada Serrano & Mercedes Fernández & Eva Bajo Marcos, 2024. "Building a Set of Indicators to Assess Migrant Children's Integration in Europe: A Co-Creation Approach," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(6), pages 2389-2417, December.
    17. Sarah A. Avellar & Jaime Thomas & Rebecca Kleinman & Emily Sama-Miller & Sara E. Woodruff & Rebecca Coughlin & T’Pring R. Westbrook, 2017. "External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(4), pages 283-325, August.
    18. Sarah G. McCarthy & Richard R. Rushforth, 2025. "Identifying Barriers to Implementation of Regenerative Agricultural Solutions Through Convergence Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Horton, Douglas & Rotondo, Emma & Paz Ybarnegaray, Rodrigo & Hareau, Guy & Devaux, André & Thiele, Graham, 2013. "Lapses, infidelities, and creative adaptations: Lessons from evaluation of a participatory market development approach in the Andes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 28-41.
    20. van Loon, Jos H.M. & Bonham, Gordon S. & Peterson, Dale D. & Schalock, Robert L. & Claes, Claudia & Decramer, Adelien E.M., 2013. "The use of evidence-based outcomes in systems and organizations providing services and supports to persons with intellectual disability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 80-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.