IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviy2023i3p534-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Commitment in the Assessment of Employees of Different Generations: A Research Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Wziatek-Stasko
  • Izabela Michalik
  • Jolita Vveinhardt

Abstract

Purpose: The article aims at presenting results of the original empirical research on the diagnosis of the relationship between the level of organizational commitment of employees and their generational affiliation. Design/Methodology/Approach: Research was carried out in the form of literature studies and empirical research, using quantitative methods. The survey involved 588 persons working in Polish organizations, belonging to four generations: Late Boomers, Generation X, Generation Y and Generation Z. Employees’ age is an important variable determining the level of organizational commitment. Findings: Taking into account generational differences, empirical research shows a high level of organizational commitment in all three of its components declared by the respondents involved. It was also found that organizational commitment varied depending on its type and the generation to which the respondents belonged. Practical Implications: Due to the benefits implied by a high level of employee commitment for the organization, this issue is important for science and managerial staff. For the leaders of organizations, the results of the conducted study may indicate the directions for increasing organizational commitment, taking into account generational diversity. Originality/value: The level of organizational commitment was identified in three components: affective commitment, continuance commitment and normative commitment in the context of employees' generational affiliation. The collected factual material fills the epistemological gap identified as a result of the studies of Polish and foreign literature on the discussed issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Wziatek-Stasko & Izabela Michalik & Jolita Vveinhardt, 2023. "Organizational Commitment in the Assessment of Employees of Different Generations: A Research Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 534-555.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:3:p:534-555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3230/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umi Hamidaton Mohd Soffian Lee & Azman Ismail & Nurul Shahida Ahmad Sanusi, 2018. "Ethical Climate as a Determinant of Organizational Commitment," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(8), pages 534-539.
    2. Packiaraj Thangavel & Pramod Pathak & Bibhas Chandra, 2022. "Consumer Decision-making Style of Gen Z: A Generational Cohort Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(3), pages 710-728, June.
    3. Diego Norena-Chavez, 2020. "The Mediation Effect of Innovative Behavior on the Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 238-252.
    4. Zahra, Shaker A. & Neubaum, Donald O. & Larraneta, Barbara, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 1070-1079, October.
    5. Cherchem, Naïma, 2017. "The relationship between organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: Does generational involvement matter?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 87-98.
    6. Diego Norena-Chavez & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2022. "Transactional Leadership and Innovative Behavior as Factors Explaining Emotional Intelligence: A Mediating Effect," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-9, November.
    7. Duygu Turker, 2009. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 189-204, October.
    8. Yubo Hou & Ge Gao & Fei Wang & Tingrui Li & Zhilan Yu, 2011. "Organizational Commitment and Creativity: the Influence of Thinking Styles," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 12(2), pages 411-431, November.
    9. Umi Hamidaton Mohd Soffian Lee & Azman Ismail & Nurul Shahida Ahmad Sanusi, 2018. "Ethical Climate as a Determinant of Organizational Commitment," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(8), pages 534-539, August.
    10. Živa Juriševič Brčić & Katarina Katja Mihelič, 2015. "Knowledge sharing between different generations of employees: an example from Slovenia," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 853-867, January.
    11. Paulin, Michele & Ferguson, Ronald J. & Bergeron, Jasmin, 2006. "Service climate and organizational commitment: The importance of customer linkages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(8), pages 906-915, August.
    12. repec:eme:ijlma0:ijlma-09-2013-0041 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Devece, Carlos & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Pilar Alguacil, María, 2016. "Organizational commitment and its effects on organizational citizenship behavior in a high-unemployment environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1857-1861.
    14. Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen & Marimuthu, Malliga & Kandampully, Jay & Bilgihan, Anil, 2017. "What drives Gen Y loyalty? Understanding the mediated moderating roles of switching costs and alternative attractiveness in the value-satisfaction-loyalty chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 124-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2023. "Openness to knowledge: does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between familiness and absorptive capacity?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1449-1482, April.
    2. Ante Glavas & Lindsey Godwin, 2013. "Is the Perception of ‘Goodness’ Good Enough? Exploring the Relationship Between Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Organizational Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 15-27, April.
    3. Kim, Yeonshin & Hur, Won-Moo & Lee, Luri, 2023. "Understanding customer participation in CSR activities: The impact of perceptions of CSR, affective commitment, brand equity, and corporate reputation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Behrooz Gharleghi & Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi & Khaled Nawaser, 2018. "The Outcomes of Corporate Social Responsibility to Employees: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Tarighi, Sina & Shavvalpour, Saeed, 2021. "Technological development of E&P companies in developing countries: An integrative approach to define and prioritize customized elements of technological capability in EOR," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Diego Norena-Chavez, 2022. "Influence of SARS-CoV-2 on the Mediating Effect of Entrepreneurial Passion in the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Innovative Behavior," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 125-139.
    7. Talat Islam & Saima Ahmad & Ishfaq Ahmed, 2023. "Linking environment specific servant leadership with organizational environmental citizenship behavior: the roles of CSR and attachment anxiety," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 855-879, April.
    8. Jörn H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & James Lau & Martin Obschonka & André Presse, 2019. "How Do Labor Market Institutions Influence the Preference to Work in Family Firms? A Multilevel Analysis Across 40 Countries," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(6), pages 1067-1093, November.
    9. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Sanchez-Bueno, Maria J. & Usero, Belen, 2014. "How may the nature of family firms explain the decisions concerning international diversification?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1311-1320.
    11. Nagib Salem Bayoud & Marie Kavanagh & Geoff Slaughter, 2012. "An Empirical Study Of The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure And Organizational Performance: Evidence From Libya," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(3), pages 69-82.
    12. Daniel Martínez-Cevallos & Alejandra Proaño-Grijalva & Mario Alguacil & Daniel Duclos-Bastías & David Parra-Camacho, 2020. "Segmentation of Participants in a Sports Event Using Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Yan Ling & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2010. "The Effects of Family Firm Specific Sources of TMT Diversity: The Moderating Role of Information Exchange Frequency," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 322-344, March.
    14. Jiali Chen & Aiqing Zhang, 2023. "Exploring How and When Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Impacts Employees’ Green Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Environmental Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Jie Shen & Hongru Zhang, 2019. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management and Employee Support for External CSR: Roles of Organizational CSR Climate and Perceived CSR Directed Toward Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 875-888, May.
    16. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Tarba, Shlomo, 2021. "Knowledge hiding and knowledge sharing in small family farms: A stewardship view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 279-292.
    17. Carlson, Jamie & Rahman, Mohammad M. & Taylor, Alexander & Voola, Ranjit, 2019. "Feel the VIBE: Examining value-in-the-brand-page-experience and its impact on satisfaction and customer engagement behaviours in mobile social media," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 149-162.
    18. Özlem Yýldýrým-Öktem, 2010. "Generational Differences In Involvement Of Family Members In Governance And Management Of Turkish Family Business Groups And Background Characteristics Of Family Members," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 41-66.
    19. Ashill, Nicholas J. & Rod, Michel, 2011. "Burnout processes in non-clinical health service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1116-1127, October.
    20. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational commitment; affective commitment; continuance commitment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:3:p:534-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.