IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuf/journl/y2011v12i2p411-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Commitment and Creativity: the Influence of Thinking Styles

Author

Listed:
  • Yubo Hou

    (Department of Psychology, Peking University)

  • Ge Gao

    (Department of Psychology, Peking University)

  • Fei Wang

    (Department of Psychology, Peking University)

  • Tingrui Li

    (Department of Psychology, Peking University)

  • Zhilan Yu

    (Department of Psychology, Peking University)

Abstract

Creativity has long been a popular research question among psychologists. Studies in the past few decades have explored the effect of both internal individual factors and external environmental factors on creativity. The findings help shed light on how we can cultivate and further tap creativity. With the increasing role of culture in the study of psychology in the recent decade, researchers have now begun to turn their attention to the study of how culture can influence creativity. Answering this question in a scientific way is of profound significance to the ongoing educational reform in China. Based on the unique thinking style of Chinese people and focusing on knowledge workers engaged in creative activities, our study explored the relationships among thinking style, organizational commitment and creativity of Chinese employees. We theorized that the thinking style of connection and change would influence employee creativity both directly and indirectly. Data analysis from a sample of 134 Chinese subordinates supported our hypothesis, indicating that connection was correlated positively to creativity, whereas change was correlated negatively. Furthermore, connection was found to have a moderating effect on the relationship between organizational commitment and creativity; and the influence of change on employee creativity was partially mediated by organizational commitment. Our findings are of great theoretical and practical significance for understanding the mechanisms the effect of thinking style.

Suggested Citation

  • Yubo Hou & Ge Gao & Fei Wang & Tingrui Li & Zhilan Yu, 2011. "Organizational Commitment and Creativity: the Influence of Thinking Styles," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 12(2), pages 411-431, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2011:v:12:i:2:p:411-431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aeconf.net/Articles/Nov2011/aef120209.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://down.aefweb.net/AefArticles/aef120209.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanhua Peng & Kaiping Peng, 2010. "Ethnic Stereotypes and Economic Discrepancy: The Illusion of Differences between Han and Uyghur Chinese," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 11(2), pages 381-397, November.
    2. Wanhua Peng & Xiaobin Peng & Kaiping Peng, 2009. "The Paradox of Educational Fairness in China," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 10(1), pages 199-213, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:touman:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:144-157 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:ibn:jmsjnl:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:22-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Razali Mat Zin & Amine Nehari Talet, 2016. "The Effects Of Participation In Decision Making On Organizational Commitment: Some Empirical Evidences," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 3405991, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Thinking style; Organizational commitment; Creativity; Culture;

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2011:v:12:i:2:p:411-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Qiang Gao). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/emcufcn.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.