IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/develo/v4y2024i4id15180.html

Religious Leaders Stewardship and COVID-19: A Sustainable Approach to Advocacy on Health Emergency Response in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Jenifer Wothaya Wambugu
  • Dorothy Kyalo

Abstract

Responding to public health emergencies needs efforts from all participants. Quick mobilization of people targeted a remarkable and successful change in behavior. Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic requires a strategic, sustainable approach that causes desirable outcomes. In Africa, a remarkable number of people are religious. This allows institutions of faith to be used as a set structure to reach the right target with the right information. Through the SCOPE COVID scheme, World Relief uses an elaborate and established mechanism of collaborating with the faith leaders in its planning. A qualitative approach was the main methodology of this research. SCOPE COVID Project developed sermon guides for Christian Leaders (clergy and pastors), a guide for leaders of Muslim (imams), and also a guide for Hindu leaders, respectively entitled; ‘Does Christianity advocate for COVID-19 vaccine?’, ‘Does Hinduism advocate for COVID-19 vaccine?’, and ‘Does Islam advocate for COVID-19 vaccine?’ The guides were distributed to 490 faith leaders, Christians, and Muslims in Turkana and Kajiado counties. The trained leaders of faith were given a chance to reach out to members of their faith with COVID-19 lessons as well as other preventive preventive measures. Findings show that 490 leaders of faith were trained as trainers of trainees. In a quarter, the leaders of faith were 12,670 persons with messages about vaccines, while others suggested preventive measures. The 490 faith institutions were represented by leaders trained to enable COVID-19 measures of prevention. The results indicated that faith leaders are willing to collaborate with the government and other participants in emergency response. Leaders of faith are willing to be included in health response. It can be concluded that leaders of faith have taken their responsibility of curbing COVID-19 seriously and kept off the syndrome of poor wisdom of interpreting the scourge as punishment from God to human beings.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenifer Wothaya Wambugu & Dorothy Kyalo, 2024. "Religious Leaders Stewardship and COVID-19: A Sustainable Approach to Advocacy on Health Emergency Response in Kenya," European Journal of Development Studies, European Open Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-6, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:4:y:2024:i:4:id:15180
    DOI: 10.24018/ejdevelop.2024.4.4.180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/view/15180
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/download/15180/3626
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejdevelop.2024.4.4.180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaoqin Li, 2021. "Religious founders and employee welfare," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 6037-6067, December.
    2. Tuyet-Anh T. Le & Kelly Vodden & Jianghua Wu & Ghada Atiwesh, 2021. "Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-32, January.
    3. Liangyong Wan & Jianyou Ou & Bingxuan Lin, 2021. "Does religion affect cost stickiness? Evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(32), pages 3730-3743, July.
    4. repec:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:12:p:116-120 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harmon, Brook E. & San Diego, Emily Rose N. & Pichon, Latrice C. & Powell, Terrinieka W. & Rugless, Fedoria & West, Nathan T. & Minor, Lottie & McNeal, Sterling & McCann, Lauren & Hales, Lauren S. & D, 2022. "Congregational health needs by key demographic variables: Findings from a congregational health needs assessment tool," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Tobias Koellner & Muhammad Anwar, 2026. "Mapping Research Into Religion in Family Firms: Conceptual Framework Development," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 815-849, April.
    3. Willis, Alison & Devi, Aruna & Whitfield, Haley, 2025. "Efficacious learning strategies and experiences for education recovery after disruption," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Arjun Bhardwaj & Sushanta Kumar Mishra & Israr Qureshi & Kunal Kamal Kumar & Alison M. Konrad & Marc‐David L. Seidel & Babita Bhatt, 2021. "Bridging Caste Divides: Middle‐Status Ambivalence, Elite Closure, and Lower‐Status Social Withdrawal," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(8), pages 2111-2136, December.
    5. Nam Hoang Tran & Nhien Thi Nguyen & Binh Thanh Nguyen & Quang Ngoc Phan, 2022. "Students’ Perceived Well-Being and Online Preference: Evidence from Two Universities in Vietnam during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:6pjwh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Salesi, Vinolia Kilinaivoni & Kan Tsui, Wai Hong & Fu, Xiaowen & Gilbey, Andrew, 2022. "Strategies for South Pacific Region to address future pandemics: Implications for the aviation and tourism sectors based on a systematic literature review (2010–2021)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-126.
    8. Long, Zhineng & Duan, Yulan & Zhan, Heng, 2024. "The impact of organizational-level political connection on environmental strategy in private firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Liu, Li & Hu, Wenxiu & Wang, Fangyun & Yang, Li, 2025. "Does employing academic executives enhance R&D cost stickiness? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Freeman, Toby & Baum, Fran & Musolino, Connie & Flavel, Joanne & McKee, Martin & Chi, Chunhuei & Giugliani, Camila & Falcão, Matheus Zuliane & De Ceukelaire, Wim & Howden-Chapman, Philippa & Nguyen, T, 2023. "Illustrating the impact of commercial determinants of health on the global COVID-19 pandemic: Thematic analysis of 16 country case studies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Kuo-Jung Lee & Su-Lien Lu, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on the Stock Price of Socially Responsible Enterprises: An Empirical Study in Taiwan Stock Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Minas N. Kastanakis & Solon Magrizos & Katerina Kampouri & Andrea Calabrò, 2025. "Family Firms and Ethics: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Determinants of Ethical Decision-Making and Emerging Future Research Pathways," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 919-946, May.
    13. Xiaowei Ma & Wanwan Ma & Xin Zhao & Xiaoxiao Zhou & Kamel Si Mohammed, 2024. "Increasing Burdens or Reducing Costs: Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Cost Stickiness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2136-2155, March.
    14. Louis Reymondin & Thibaud Vantalon & Huong Thi Mai Pham & Hieu Trung Le & Tuyen Thi Thanh Huynh & Ricardo Hernandez & Brice Even & Thang Cong Nguyen & Trong Van Phan & Kien Tri Nguyen & Christophe Bén, 2024. "Using free Wi-Fi to assess impact of COVID-19 pandemic on traditional wet markets in Hanoi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(1), pages 223-241, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:4:y:2024:i:4:id:15180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.