IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v82y2019icp117-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese third-party shipping internet platforms: Thriving and surviving in a two-sided market (2013–2016)

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yang
  • Zhang, Qiang
  • Chen, Shun
  • Wan, Zheng

Abstract

How can cargo owners be persuaded to switch their traditional offline business practices to a third-party online shipping platform? To address this question, we selected 10 representative third-party shipping Internet platforms in China and analyzed them based on grounded theory. In-depth interviews that lasted an average of 2.5 h were conducted with each company. After applying open coding and axial coding to interview transcripts that included more than 110,000 words (in Chinese), we propose three industrial characteristics that may hinder the development of Chinese third-party shipping Internet platforms. The two most popular initiating strategies adopted to address these issues are "disintermediation" and "service upgrading.” Our theoretical framework suggests that each initiating strategy should include three interconnected issues that can ensure a platform's success: value proposition, entry mode and competitive advantage. The final sections of our study describe our contributions to theoretical development and implications for practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yang & Zhang, Qiang & Chen, Shun & Wan, Zheng, 2019. "Chinese third-party shipping internet platforms: Thriving and surviving in a two-sided market (2013–2016)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 117-126.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:117-126
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X17305504
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mostafa Jafari & Mohammad Taghi Taghavifard & Saeed Rouhani & Morteza Moalagh, 2010. "E-commerce development experiences in world's leading container ports and offering a model for Shahid Rajaee Port," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 53-72, January.
    2. Robin S. Lee, 2013. "Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(7), pages 2960-3000, December.
    3. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    4. Birgit Pauksztat, 2017. "‘Only work and sleep’: seafarers’ perceptions of job demands of short sea cargo shipping lines and their effects on work and life on board," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 899-915, October.
    5. She, Zhen-Yu & Qing Sun, & Ma, Jia-Jun & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2017. "What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 29-40.
    6. Eladio Peñaloza & Mary Brooks & Sunny Marche, 2007. "Case study analysis of the impacts of electronic commerce on the strategic management of container shipping companies," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 37-54, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhanwei Tian & Guoqing Zhang, 2021. "Multi-echelon fulfillment warehouse rent and production allocation for online direct selling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 427-451, September.
    2. Chen, Yang & Tao, Kan & Jiao, Wen & Yang, Dong, 2020. "Investigating the underlying social psychology of the innovation adoption in container trucking industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 259-270.
    3. Wang, Zhihong & Li, Yangyang & Gu, Fu & Guo, Jianfeng & Wu, Xiaojun, 2020. "Two-sided matching and strategic selection on freight resource sharing platforms," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dietrich, Antje-Mareike, 2016. "Governmental platform intermediation to promote alternative fuel vehicles," Economics Department Working Paper Series 16, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Economics Department.
    2. James E. Prieger & Wei‐Min Hu, 2012. "Applications Barrier To Entry And Exclusive Vertical Contracts In Platform Markets," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 50(2), pages 435-452, April.
    3. Daniel Björkegren, 2022. "Competition in network industries: Evidence from the Rwandan mobile phone network," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(1), pages 200-225, March.
    4. Luís Cabral, 2011. "Dynamic Price Competition with Network Effects," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 78(1), pages 83-111.
    5. Michael L. Katz, 2019. "Platform economics and antitrust enforcement: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 138-152, January.
    6. Kim, Jin-Hyuk & Prince, Jeffrey & Qiu, Calvin, 2014. "Indirect network effects and the quality dimension: A look at the gaming industry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 99-108.
    7. Bruno Jullien & Alessandro Pavan & Marc Rysman, 2021. "Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects," Post-Print hal-03828345, HAL.
    8. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107687899, January.
    9. Nico Wiegand & Yuri Peers & Alexander Bleier, 2023. "Software multihoming to distal markets: Evidence of cannibalization and complementarity in the video game console industry," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 393-417, March.
    10. Dietrich, Antje-Mareike, 2017. "Platform intermediation to sponsor alternative fuel vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 90-99.
    11. Basaure, Arturo & Vesselkov, Alexandr & Töyli, Juuso, 2020. "Internet of things (IoT) platform competition: Consumer switching versus provider multihoming," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    12. María Fernanda Viecens, 2009. "Compatibility with Firm Dominance," Working Papers 2009-12, FEDEA.
    13. Pouyet, Jérôme & Trégouët, Thomas, 2016. "Vertical Mergers in Platform Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 11703, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Xiao Liu & Timothy Derdenger & Baohong Sun, 2018. "An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Purchase Behavior of Base Products and Add-ons Given Compatibility Constraints," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 569-591, August.
    15. Tang, Hua & Chen, Jing & Ai, Xingzheng & Li, Xiaojing & He, Haojia, 2023. "First-party content decision under competitive hardware/software platforms: Free vs. charge," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1068-1083.
    16. Yue Liu & Rong Luo, 2023. "Network Effects and Multinetwork Sellers’ Dynamic Pricing in the U.S. Smartphone Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3297-3318, June.
    17. Patrick Loux & Mathilde Aubry & Sébastien Tran & Emmanuel Baudoin, 2020. "Multi-sided platforms in B2B contexts : the role of affiliation costs and interdependencies in adoption decisions," Post-Print hal-02376313, HAL.
    18. Calvano, Emilio & Polo, Michele, 2021. "Market power, competition and innovation in digital markets: A survey," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    19. Nam, Kyungjin & Kim, Hye-jin, 2020. "The determinants of mobile game success in South Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    20. Jeitschko, Thomas D. & Tremblay, Mark J., 2014. "Homogeneous platform competition with endogenous homing," DICE Discussion Papers 166, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:117-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.