IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v176y2026ics0967070x25004676.html

Tech on Wheels: Exploring Microtransit's ICT perceptions in Latin America and the Caribbean

Author

Listed:
  • Scholl, Lynn
  • Sabogal-Cardona, Orlando
  • Oviedo, Daniel
  • Arellana, Julián
  • Cantillo, Víctor
  • Ojeda-Diaz, Alfredo J.

Abstract

Microtransit services are a midpoint between standard ride-hailing services and conventional bus fleets from public transit. Utilizing small buses or vans to provide on-demand shared transport, these services enable users to reserve seats, track their trips, and receive real-time estimates of pick-up and drop-off times. While public transit systems in the Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC) region are the subject of critical and often contentious policy debates with frequent references to user discontent and an overall decline in quality, microtransit is emerging as an alternative that could improve existing transit systems. They are argued to be an effective means to extend the coverage of transit services in transit deserts, by providing service in areas without transit routes and where investments in stations and infrastructure might not be cost effective. Despite its potential benefits, microtransit remains under studied in the LAC region. Based on survey data gathered for Barranquilla, Colombia, and Mexico City, Mexico, this research examines the added value of digital technology features in microtransit. This paper explores individuals' perceptions of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) features present in microtransit and different variables mediating such perceptions. Employing factor analysis, and Structural Equation Models (SEM), ICT features are considered as latent variables and placed as the main outcome of the SEM. Other latent variables encompassing perceptions, such as the quality and safety of public transit, are also included in the model. Results indicate that individuals with pro-car attitudes and those who own cars are more likely to prefer ICT features in microtransit, suggesting potential for modal shift. Similarly, insecurity in public transit also explains favorable perceptions about the ICT features in microtransit. We also found that higher levels of technological savviness and being a ride-hailing adopter are related to increased valuations of microtransit.

Suggested Citation

  • Scholl, Lynn & Sabogal-Cardona, Orlando & Oviedo, Daniel & Arellana, Julián & Cantillo, Víctor & Ojeda-Diaz, Alfredo J., 2026. "Tech on Wheels: Exploring Microtransit's ICT perceptions in Latin America and the Caribbean," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:176:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004676
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25004676
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Sangen & Li, Chun & Wu, Weitiao & Yang, Ying, 2025. "Exploring the determinants of demand-responsive transit acceptance in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 150-163.
    2. Rossetti, Tomás & Broaddus, Andrea & Ruhl, Melissa & Daziano, Ricardo, 2023. "Commuter preferences for a first-mile/last-mile microtransit service in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Ma, Liang & Zhang, Xin & Ding, Xiaoyan & Wang, Gaoshan, 2018. "Bike sharing and users’ subjective well-being: An empirical study in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 14-24.
    4. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Cohen, Adam & Chan, Nelson & Bansal, Apaar, 2020. "Chapter 13 - Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0z9711dw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Enrique Fernández L., J. & de Cea Ch., Joaquin & Malbran, R. Henry, 2008. "Demand responsive urban public transport system design: Methodology and application," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 951-972, August.
    6. Joanna Moody & Elizabeth Farr & Marisa Papagelis & David R. Keith, 2021. "The value of car ownership and use in the United States," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(9), pages 769-774, September.
    7. Miah, Md Mintu & Naz, Farah & Hyun, Kate (Kyung) & Mattingly, Stephen P. & Cronley, Courtney & Fields, Noelle, 2020. "Barriers and opportunities for paratransit users to adopt on-demand micro transit," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Villena-Sanchez, Jessica & Boschmann, E. Eric & Avila-Forcada, Sara, 2022. "Daily travel behaviors and transport mode choice of older adults in Mexico City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Alemi, Farzad & Circella, Giovanni & Mokhtarian, Patricia & Handy, Susan, 2018. "Exploring the latent constructs behind the use of ridehailing in California," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 47-62.
    10. Onésimo Flores Dewey, 2019. "App-Based Collective Transport Service in Mexico City: A Start-Up Case Study," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2019/01, OECD Publishing.
    11. Robert Cervero, 2017. "Mobility Niches: Jitneys to Robo-Taxis," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(4), pages 404-412, October.
    12. Sabogal-Cardona, Orlando & Scholl, Lynn & Oviedo, Daniel & Crotte Alvarado, Amado & Bedoya-Maya, Felipe, 2021. "Not My Usual Trip: Ride-hailing Characterization in Mexico City," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 11500, Inter-American Development Bank.
    13. Moody, Joanna & Zhao, Jinhua, 2019. "Car pride and its bidirectional relations with car ownership: Case studies in New York City and Houston," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 334-353.
    14. repec:osf:socarx:y4jwk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Arellana, Julián & Alvarez, Vilma & Oviedo, Daniel & Guzman, Luis A., 2021. "Walk this way: Pedestrian accessibility and equity in Barranquilla and Soledad, Colombia," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Daniel F. Martinez & Oscar A. Mitnik & Edgar Salgado & Lynn Scholl & Patricia Yañez-Pagans, 2020. "Connecting to Economic Opportunity: the Role of Public Transport in Promoting Women’s Employment in Lima," Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Scholl, Lynn & Bedoya-Maya, Felipe & Sabogal-Cardona, Orlando & Oviedo, Daniel, 2021. "Making the Links between Ride-hailing and Public Transit Ridership: Impacts in Medium and Large Colombian Cities," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 11673, Inter-American Development Bank.
    18. Alejandro Tirachini, 2020. "Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2011-2047, August.
    19. Wei Zhai & Shuqi Gao & Mengyang Liu & Di Wei, 2023. "Examining the effects of climate change perception and commuting experience on the willingness to pay for micro-transit service in Tampa, FL," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Arellana, Julián & Saltarín, María & Larrañaga, Ana Margarita & González, Virginia I. & Henao, César Augusto, 2020. "Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 310-334.
    21. Hall, Jonathan D. & Palsson, Craig & Price, Joseph, 2018. "Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 36-50.
    22. Barajas, Jesus & Brown, Anne, 2020. "Not Minding the Gap: Does Ride-Hailing Serve Transit Deserts?," SocArXiv y4jwk, Center for Open Science.
    23. Ettema, Dick & Gärling, Tommy & Olsson, Lars E. & Friman, Margareta & Moerdijk, Sjef, 2013. "The road to happiness: Measuring Dutch car drivers’ satisfaction with travel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 171-178.
    24. Pinar Bilgin & Giulio Mattioli & Malcolm Morgan & Zia Wadud, 2025. "Ridesourcing and vehicle ownership: a systematic review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 835-868, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiyuan Wang & Qing Shen, 2024. "A latent class analysis to understand riders’ adoption of on-demand mobility services as a complement to transit," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1043-1061, June.
    2. Yicong Yang & Carolyn McAndrews, 2025. "Gender gaps in ride-hail use in U.S. metropolitan areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 715-739, April.
    3. Ghimire, Subid & Bardaka, Eleni, 2025. "The role of system design attributes and community characteristics in microtransit use: Evidence from five microtransit systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Jason Soria & Shelly Etzioni & Yoram Shiftan & Amanda Stathopoulos & Eran Ben-Elia, 2022. "Microtransit adoption in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a choice experiment with transit and car commuters," Papers 2204.01974, arXiv.org.
    5. Ghimire, Subid & Bardaka, Eleni, 2025. "Examining the determinants of microtransit use and ridesharing based on trip microdata," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Muhamad Rizki & Tri Basuki Joewono & Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo & Dwi Prasetyanto, 2021. "The Effects of On- and Before- Journey Advantages Using Ride-Sourcing in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Koley, Souradeep & Kumar Barua, Mukesh & Bisi, Arnab, 2025. "Inhibitors in ridesharing firms from developing Nations: A novel Integrated MCDM – Text Mining approach using Large-Scale data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. García-Herrera, Alisson & Basso, Leonardo J. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Microeconomic analysis of ridesourcing market regulation policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Sabogal-Cardona, Orlando & Dávila, Julio D. & Oviedo, Daniel, 2025. "Lycra and guardian angels: Can leisure cycling induce travel behaviour changes?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    10. Zgheib, Najib & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Kaysi, Isam, 2020. "Modeling demand for ridesourcing as feeder for high capacity mass transit systems with an application to the planned Beirut BRT," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 70-91.
    11. Xiaoxia Dong & Erick Guerra & Ricardo A. Daziano, 2022. "Impact of TNC on travel behavior and mode choice: a comparative analysis of Boston and Philadelphia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1577-1597, December.
    12. Saharsh Agarwal & Deepa Mani & Rahul Telang, 2023. "The Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Congestion: Evidence from Indian Cities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 862-883, May.
    13. Alonso-González, María J. & Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha & van Oort, Niels & Cats, Oded & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2020. "Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 378-401.
    14. Maria Vega-Gonzalo & Álvaro Aguilera-García & Juan Gomez & José Manuel Vassallo, 2024. "Traditional taxi, e-hailing or ride-hailing? A GSEM approach to exploring service adoption patterns," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1239-1278, August.
    15. Wang, Zhuolun & Lin, Yan & Xue, Biao, 2025. "The impact of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes: an empirical study based on the validity of Chinese ride-hailing regulatory policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Hasnine, Md Sami & Hawkins, Jason & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2021. "Effects of built environment and weather on demands for transportation network company trips," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 171-185.
    17. Fayed, Lynn & Nilsson, Gustav & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "On the utilization of dedicated bus lanes for pooled ride-hailing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 29-52.
    18. Christopher Hoehne & Matteo Muratori & Paige Jadun & Brian Bush & Arthur Yip & Catherine Ledna & Laura Vimmerstedt & Kara Podkaminer & Ookie Ma, 2023. "Exploring decarbonization pathways for USA passenger and freight mobility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Dean, Matthew D. & Kockelman, Kara M., 2021. "Spatial variation in shared ride-hail trip demand and factors contributing to sharing: Lessons from Chicago," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Mashrur, Sk.Md. & Loa, Patrick & Ong, Felita & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2025. "Analyzing the influence of transit pass ownership on the determinants of ride-sourcing frequency in Metro Vancouver: Implications for policy and urban mobility planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:176:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.