IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v147y2024icp113-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social benefits resulting from electric vehicle smart charging balancing economy and decarbonization

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong, Zewei
  • Zeng, Yun
  • Zhao, Xiaoli
  • Zhang, Sufang

Abstract

Smart charging is gaining more attention with the popularity of electric vehicles (EVs). Smart charging which aims only at reducing electricity costs or reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is efficient in achieving these objectives. However, the times of lower electricity costs and CO2 emissions are not identical in power grids, putting the two objectives in conflict, which may lower the social benefits of EV smart charging. This study investigates the potential social benefit improvement of smart charging by balancing the economy and decarbonization objectives. Considering five regions located in the United States as examples, it is deduced that smart charging balancing economy and decarbonization objectives can reduce the total social costs of EV charging by 14.5%–35.1%. Furthermore, this study analyzes the impacts of three factors on the social benefits change of EV smart charging, namely charging behavior, charger power, and the social costs of CO2. In the context of transport electrification, this study provides important guidance on how to adjust the charging mode of EVs in the future to improve social benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong, Zewei & Zeng, Yun & Zhao, Xiaoli & Zhang, Sufang, 2024. "The social benefits resulting from electric vehicle smart charging balancing economy and decarbonization," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 113-124.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:147:y:2024:i:c:p:113-124
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X23003487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.12.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:147:y:2024:i:c:p:113-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.