IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v57y2013icp105-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting airport access mode choice for elderly air passengers

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Yu-Chun

Abstract

This research investigates whether elderly air passengers exhibit different mode choice behavior in regard to airport ground access. Using survey data from a Taiwanese sample, our results show that elderly air passengers prefer to ask family members to drive them to the airport, while general passengers prefer to take a taxi. The results also indicate that “safety” is the most important item in the choice of access mode and “user friendly” and “convenience for storing luggage” as the next most important items for the elderly. Elderly passengers are found to be less likely to use public transport than private transport. Factors such as “possessing a car in their household”, “carrying more luggage”, “spending more time spent in the vehicle”, and “higher ticket prices for public transport” increase the propensity for the elderly to use private transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Yu-Chun, 2013. "Factors affecting airport access mode choice for elderly air passengers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 105-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:57:y:2013:i:c:p:105-112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554513000203
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Pels & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld, 2001. "Airport and Airline Choice in a Multiple Airport Region: An Empirical Analysis for the San Francisco Bay Area," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 1-9.
    2. Psaraki, Voula & Abacoumkin, Costas, 2002. "Access mode choice for relocated airports: the new Athens International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 89-98.
    3. Jou, Rong-Chang & Hensher, David A. & Hsu, Tzu-Lan, 2011. "Airport ground access mode choice behavior after the introduction of a new mode: A case study of Taoyuan International Airport in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 371-381, May.
    4. Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Quddus, Mohammed A. & Noland, Robert B. & Bell, Michael G.H., 2008. "Mode choice of older and disabled people: a case study of shopping trips in London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 257-267.
    5. Su, Fengming & Bell, Michael G.H., 2009. "Transport for older people: Characteristics and solutions," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 46-55.
    6. Eric Hildebrand, 2003. "Dimensions in elderly travel behaviour: A simplified activity-based model using lifestyle clusters," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 285-306, August.
    7. Ipingbemi, Olusiyi, 2010. "Travel characteristics and mobility constraints of the elderly in Ibadan, Nigeria," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 285-291.
    8. Hjorthol, Randi J. & Levin, Lena & Sirén, Anu, 2010. "Mobility in different generations of older persons," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 624-633.
    9. Humphreys, Ian & Ison, Stephen, 2005. "Changing airport employee travel behaviour: the role of airport surface access strategies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, January.
    10. Alsnih, Rahaf & Hensher, David A., 2003. "The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 903-916, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristoffersson, Ida & Berglund , Svante, 2020. "Modelling connection trips to long-distance travel : state-of-the-art and directions for future research," Papers 2020:5, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    2. Mengru Shao & Chao Chen & Qingchang Lu & Xinyu Zuo & Xueling Liu & Xiaoning Gu, 2023. "The Impacts of Low-Carbon Incentives and Carbon-Reduction Awareness on Airport Ground Access Mode Choice under Travel Time Uncertainty: A Hybrid CPT-MNL Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Ha, Jaehyun & Lee, Sugie & Ko, Joonho, 2020. "Unraveling the impact of travel time, cost, and transit burdens on commute mode choice for different income and age groups," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 147-166.
    4. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Madio, Leonardo, 2017. "High-speed rail, inter-modal substitution and willingness-to-pay. A stated preference analysis for the ‘Bari-Rome’," Working Papers 17_6, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    5. Kim, Tae Hyun & Wu, Cheng-Lung & Koo, Tae-Ryang, 2017. "Implications of the ageing society and internationalisation for airport services: A perspective on passenger demand for personal space at airport terminals," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 84-92.
    6. Laurino, Antonio & Beria, Paolo & Debernardi, Andrea & Ferrara, Emanuele, 2019. "Accessibility to Italian remote regions: Comparison among different transport alternatives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 127-138.
    7. Methawadee Chaisomboon & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2020. "Elderly Users’ Satisfaction with Public Transport in Thailand Using Different Importance Performance Analysis Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Silva, Henrique Guilherme Montes & Guterres, Marcelo Xavier & Bandeira, Michelle Carvalho Galvão da Silva Pinto & Alves, Cláudio Jorge Pinto & Sonáglio, Cláudio Abano, 2022. "The role of security in passengers' airport ground access choices: A statistical evaluation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Yazdanpanah, Mahdi & Hosseinlou, Mansour Hadji, 2016. "The influence of personality traits on airport public transport access mode choice: A hybrid latent class choice modeling approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 147-163.
    10. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane, 2017. "Modelling regional accessibility towards airports using discrete choice models: an application to the Apulian airport system," Working Papers 17_4, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    11. Graham, Anne & Kruse, Willy & Budd, Lucy & Kremarik, Frances & Ison, Stephen, 2023. "Ageing passenger perceptions of ground access journeys to airports: A survey of UK residents," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Fu, Qian & Kim, Amy M., 2016. "Supply-and-demand models for exploring relationships between smaller airports and neighboring hub airports in the U.S," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 67-79.
    13. Kalakou, Sofia & Moura, Filipe, 2021. "Analyzing passenger behavior in airport terminals based on activity preferences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Aleksandra Colovic & Salvatore Gabriele Pilone & Katarina Kukić & Milica Kalić & Slavica Dožić & Danica Babić & Michele Ottomanelli, 2022. "Airport Access Mode Choice: Analysis of Passengers’ Behavior in European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Pei Yin & Jing Cheng & Miaojuan Peng, 2022. "Analyzing the Passenger Flow of Urban Rail Transit Stations by Using Entropy Weight-Grey Correlation Model: A Case Study of Shanghai in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Pei Yin & Miaojuan Peng, 2023. "Station Layout Optimization and Route Selection of Urban Rail Transit Planning: A Case Study of Shanghai Pudong International Airport," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-29, March.
    17. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane, 2020. "Modelling regional accessibility to airports using discrete choice models: An application to a system of regional airports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 855-871.
    18. Yang, Chih-Wen & Liao, Pei-Han, 2016. "Modeling the joint choice of access modes and flight routes with parallel structure and random heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 19-31.
    19. Graham, Anne & Kremarik, Frances & Kruse, Willy, 2020. "Attitudes of ageing passengers to air travel since the coronavirus pandemic," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltani, Ali & Pojani, Dorina & Askari, Sajad & Masoumi, Houshmand E., 2018. "Socio-demographic and built environment determinants of car use among older adults in Iran," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 109-117.
    2. Su, Rongxiang & Xiao, Jingyi & McBride, Elizabeth C. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2021. "Understanding senior's daily mobility patterns in California using human mobility motifs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Hahn, Jin-Seok & Kim, Hyoung-Chul & Kim, Joon-Ki & Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F., 2016. "Trip making of older adults in Seoul: Differences in effects of personal and household characteristics by age group and trip purpose," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 55-62.
    4. Mitra, Suman & Yao, Mingqi & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2021. "Gender differences in elderly mobility in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 203-226.
    5. Wong, R.C.P. & Szeto, W.Y. & Yang, Linchuan & Li, Y.C. & Wong, S.C., 2018. "Public transport policy measures for improving elderly mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 73-79.
    6. Olawole, Moses Olaniran & Aloba, Oluwole, 2014. "Mobility characteristics of the elderly and their associated level of satisfaction with transport services in Osogbo, Southwestern Nigeria," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 105-116.
    7. Yang, Dujuan & Timmermans, Harry & Grigolon, Anna, 2013. "Exploring heterogeneity in travel time expenditure of aging populations in the Netherlands: results of a CHAID analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 170-179.
    8. Lars Böcker & Patrick Amen & Marco Helbich, 2017. "Elderly travel frequencies and transport mode choices in Greater Rotterdam, the Netherlands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 831-852, July.
    9. Carlo Luiu & Miles Tight & Michael Burrow, 2018. "Factors Preventing the Use of Alternative Transport Modes to the Car in Later Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Madio, Leonardo, 2017. "High-speed rail, inter-modal substitution and willingness-to-pay. A stated preference analysis for the ‘Bari-Rome’," Working Papers 17_6, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    11. Mifsud, Deborah & Attard, Maria & Ison, Stephen, 2017. "To drive or to use the bus? An exploratory study of older people in Malta," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 23-32.
    12. Catherine Sundling & Birgitta Berglund & Mats E. Nilsson & Ragne Emardson & Leslie R. Pendrill, 2014. "Overall Accessibility to Traveling by Rail for the Elderly with and without Functional Limitations: The Whole-Trip Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Kaniz Fatima & Sara Moridpour & Tayebeh Saghapour, 2021. "Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Elderly Public Transport Mode Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane, 2017. "Modelling regional accessibility towards airports using discrete choice models: an application to the Apulian airport system," Working Papers 17_4, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    15. Hitomi Nakanishi & John Black, 2015. "Social Sustainability Issues and Older Adults’ Dependence on Automobiles in Low-Density Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Shao, Fengjing & Sui, Yi & Yu, Xiang & Sun, Rencheng, 2019. "Spatio-temporal travel patterns of elderly people – A comparative study based on buses usage in Qingdao, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 178-190.
    17. Qin, Huanmei & Gao, Jianqiang & Zhang, Guohui & Chen, Yanyan & Wu, Songhua, 2017. "Nested logit model formation to analyze airport parking behavior based on stated preference survey studies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 164-175.
    18. van den Berg, Pauline & Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry, 2011. "Estimating social travel demand of senior citizens in the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 323-331.
    19. Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Yang, Shuo & Cao, Zhan & De Vos, Jonas & Witlox, Frank, 2019. "Active travel for active ageing in China: The role of built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 142-152.
    20. Solvoll, Gisle & Hanssen, Thor-Erik Sandberg, 2017. "User satisfaction with specialised transport for disabled in Norway," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-7.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:57:y:2013:i:c:p:105-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.