IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eejocm/v56y2025ics1755534525000284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tri-reference-point framework for analyzing air-rail passenger airport access behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Zou, Wenqian
  • Zheng, Yiming
  • Gao, Shengguo
  • Jiang, Yonglei

Abstract

This study introduces a tri-reference-point framework to analyze air-rail passengers' airport ground access behaviour, using advisory, earliest, and mandatory latest airport arrival times as key reference points. Leveraging revealed preference data from Dalian Airport in China, this model examines how deviations from instructive arrival timings, rather than total ground access time, influence passenger choices among available high-speed rail (HSR) options. Compared to the traditional multinomial logit (MNL) model, the proposed approach better captures these behaviours, showing that passengers prioritize timing relative to advisory intervals. This framework also provides insights into evaluating the suitability of HSR options for air-rail integrated services.

Suggested Citation

  • Zou, Wenqian & Zheng, Yiming & Gao, Shengguo & Jiang, Yonglei, 2025. "Tri-reference-point framework for analyzing air-rail passenger airport access behaviour," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:56:y:2025:i:c:s1755534525000284
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2025.100565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534525000284
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jocm.2025.100565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:56:y:2025:i:c:s1755534525000284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-choice-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.