IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v202y2025ics1366554525003795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emission surcharge in the European Union Emissions Trading System: A competitive analysis for shipping companies

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Junjin
  • Zhang, Baiyu
  • Zhu, Qinghua
  • Liu, Jiaguo

Abstract

In the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), shipping companies operating on EU-regulated routes (intra-EU and extra-EU voyages) are required to purchase EU allowances (EUAs) for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This regulatory shift has catalyzed two effects: (1) the structural reconfiguration of operational cost frameworks, and (2) the introduction of an emission surcharge (EMS) as a pricing instrument independent of the base freight rate. The EMS is redefining competitive paradigms, shifting market rivalry from conventional freight rate competition to full price (EMS + freight rate) competition that incorporate environmental cost internalization. By employing a surcharge competition model involving two heterogeneous shipping companies (a large one characterized by greater capacity with superior service and high freight rate, and a small one characterized by relatively limited capacity with inferior service and low freight rate), this study explores the EMS pricing strategies, and examines the surcharge competition, the full price competition, and the effect of EMS on the performance outcomes. It further incorporates shipper sensitivity to EMS, as shippers, being key stakeholders in the shipping supply chain, can significantly influence surcharge strategies through their varying levels of EMS sensitivity. The analysis reveals several key findings. First, if a competitor exits the market due to high EMS, the remaining company can adopt a fixed surcharge. As the competitor’s EMS decreases, the remaining company should implement a regulatory surcharge to squeeze the competitor out of the market. When the competitor further reduces EMS, the market transitions to a coexistence scenario, where a responsive surcharge becomes the primary strategy. Second, shipping companies can strategically combine “EMS + full price” to enhance their competitive advantage. Third, a “win–win” situation is achievable under specific conditions: high shipper sensitivity to EMS coupled with low EUA price. Based on these research findings, this paper provides suggestions for policy formulation and improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Junjin & Zhang, Baiyu & Zhu, Qinghua & Liu, Jiaguo, 2025. "Emission surcharge in the European Union Emissions Trading System: A competitive analysis for shipping companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003795
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525003795
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.