IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v197y2025ics1366554525001206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of blockchain in the secondary market with counterfeiting

Author

Listed:
  • Pun, Hubert
  • Swaminathan, Jayashankar M.
  • Chen, Jing Jenny

Abstract

It is not uncommon for customers who intend to buy a used product in the secondary market to end up with a counterfeit because they have imperfect information about product authenticity. Blockchain is being piloted as a cutting-edge solution to this challenge. We use a two-period game to study the impact of utilizing blockchain to combat counterfeit products in the secondary market. We show that, even when the cost of implementing blockchain is negligible, the manufacturer can be better off incurring reputation damage than adopting blockchain. Further, the used goods reseller can be worse off from blockchain, even though that seller is not responsible for the implementation cost and benefits from blockchain’s signaling capability. We also demonstrate that the counterfeiter can benefit as a result of blockchain. When the quality of a fake product is sufficiently low, blockchain lowers consumer surplus. The winning situation of blockchain between the manufacturer, reseller, and customers is achieved only when the fake product is of intermediate quality. Blockchain can be powerful in situations when used products have a low perceived quality; otherwise, blockchain may not be ideal.

Suggested Citation

  • Pun, Hubert & Swaminathan, Jayashankar M. & Chen, Jing Jenny, 2025. "Application of blockchain in the secondary market with counterfeiting," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525001206
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525001206
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:197:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525001206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.