IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x25002544.html

Towards an integrative model of organizational human-AI collaboration: A semi-systematic review of the current state of the art

Author

Listed:
  • Do Khac, Lilian Tai
  • Leyer, Michael

Abstract

This article emphasizes the role of AI trustworthiness in business operations, aiming to understand which factors must be considered to ensure trust with AI in human-AI collaboration settings. While acknowledging the prevailing emphasis on technical aspects, our research highlights the necessity of a formalized trust model with AI. Through a literature review, we identify foundational principles for designing human-AI systems. Our key contribution lies in proposing a set of sixteen key conceptual elements as testable hypotheses for future studies. These elements are systematically integrated into a unified trust framework, providing a structure to enhance trust in AI systems, thereby fostering more effective human-AI interactions. By clarifying the features of AI that enhance human trust, this framework bridges conceptual gaps in prior literature and provides actionable insights for aligning AI development with organizational and user needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Do Khac, Lilian Tai & Leyer, Michael, 2026. "Towards an integrative model of organizational human-AI collaboration: A semi-systematic review of the current state of the art," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002544
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002544
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.