IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v79y2024ics0160791x24003051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reverse salient as a nexus of technologies and values in sociotechnical systems: A case study of lithium-ion batteries

Author

Listed:
  • Miao, Yunxuan

Abstract

A good comprehension of value dynamics can contribute to a more value-sensitive and responsible design of technology. Theories addressing changes in values related to technology tend to reduce the complexity of technology development, neglecting the intricate interrelations between technical components within sociotechnical systems. This paper proposes an approach that incorporates Thomas Hughes’ notion of reverse salient to explore value change across two sociotechnical scenarios, which also aligns with the pragmatic account of values. Through an analysis of the values of safety and sustainability within lithium-ion battery (LiB) technologies, this study illustrates how the approach assesses changes in the relative importance of specific values within a certain domain, as well as the dynamics in the translation of these values. This case demonstrates that the emergence of reverse salients can enhance the recognition of certain values, potentially prompting a reconsideration of how these values are interpreted or translated. The study recommends that future research advances the operationalization of reverse salients and applies them to specific contexts to better manage value change.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao, Yunxuan, 2024. "Reverse salient as a nexus of technologies and values in sociotechnical systems: A case study of lithium-ion batteries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24003051
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24003051
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulder, Karel & Kaijser, Arne, 2014. "The dynamics of technological systems integration: Water management, electricity supply, railroads and industrialization at the Göta Älv," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 88-99.
    2. Liu, Yin & Alnafrah, Ibrahim & Zhou, Yaying, 2024. "A systemic efficiency measurement of resource management and sustainable practices: A network bias-corrected DEA assessment of OECD countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Yu Zhang & Feng Yu, 2018. "Which Socio-Economic Indicators Influence Collective Morality? Big Data Analysis on Online Chinese Social Media," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 792-800, March.
    4. J.-M. Tarascon & M. Armand, 2001. "Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6861), pages 359-367, November.
    5. Frank W. Geels, 2005. "Technological Transitions and System Innovations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3576, March.
    6. Ruiz, V. & Pfrang, A. & Kriston, A. & Omar, N. & Van den Bossche, P. & Boon-Brett, L., 2018. "A review of international abuse testing standards and regulations for lithium ion batteries in electric and hybrid electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1427-1452.
    7. Anqi Zeng & Wu Chen & Kasper Dalgas Rasmussen & Xuehong Zhu & Maren Lundhaug & Daniel B. Müller & Juan Tan & Jakob K. Keiding & Litao Liu & Tao Dai & Anjian Wang & Gang Liu, 2022. "Battery technology and recycling alone will not save the electric mobility transition from future cobalt shortages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Hsien-Chen Lo & Ching-Yan Wu & Mei-Chih Hu, 2020. "Acting as an innovation niche seeder:how can the reverse salient of southeast Asian economies be overcome?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1195-1217, September.
    9. Hsien-Chen Lo & Ching-Yan Wu & Mei-Chih Hu, 2020. "Acting as an innovation niche seeder:how can the reverse salient of southeast Asian economies be overcome?," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Keun Lee (ed.), Innovation, Catch-up and Sustainable Development, pages 259-282, Springer.
    10. Christine Milchram & Geerten Van de Kaa & Neelke Doorn & Rolf Künneke, 2018. "Moral Values as Factors for Social Acceptance of Smart Grid Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal, 2002. "Technology and Business: Rethinking the Moral Dilemma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 45-50, November.
    12. Dehghani-Sanij, A.R. & Tharumalingam, E. & Dusseault, M.B. & Fraser, R., 2019. "Study of energy storage systems and environmental challenges of batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 192-208.
    13. Kai Li & Qiudan Su & Xiaofan Ma & Haifeng Zhang, 2023. "Research on Lithium Technology Safety Issues: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip, Abin & Ruban Kumar, A., 2023. "Recent advancements and developments employing 2D-materials in enhancing the performance of electrochemical supercapacitors: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Mohammadmahdi Ghiji & Vasily Novozhilov & Khalid Moinuddin & Paul Joseph & Ian Burch & Brigitta Suendermann & Grant Gamble, 2020. "A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Suppression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-30, October.
    3. Pedram Asef & Marzia Milan & Andrew Lapthorn & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, 2021. "Future Trends and Aging Analysis of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Mao, Ning & Gadkari, Siddharth & Wang, Zhirong & Zhang, Teng & Bai, Jinglong & Cai, Qiong, 2023. "A comparative analysis of lithium-ion batteries with different cathodes under overheating and nail penetration conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    5. Lu, Danning & Hui, Eddie Chi Man & Shen, Jianfu & Shi, Jianxun, 2024. "Digital industry agglomeration and urban innovation: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1998-2025.
    6. Thi Kim Tuoi, Truong & Van Toan, Nguyen & Ono, Takahito, 2022. "Self-powered wireless sensing system driven by daily ambient temperature energy harvesting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Ostanek, Jason K. & Li, Weisi & Mukherjee, Partha P. & Crompton, K.R. & Hacker, Christopher, 2020. "Simulating onset and evolution of thermal runaway in Li-ion cells using a coupled thermal and venting model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Chankook Park & Wan Gyu Heo & Myung Eun Lee, 2024. "Study on Consumers’ Perceived Benefits and Risks of Smart Energy System," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 288-300, May.
    9. Colvin, John & Blackmore, Chris & Chimbuya, Sam & Collins, Kevin & Dent, Mark & Goss, John & Ison, Ray & Roggero, Pier Paolo & Seddaiu, Giovanna, 2014. "In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 760-771.
    10. David Gibbs & Kirstie O'Neill, 2014. "Rethinking Sociotechnical Transitions and Green Entrepreneurship: The Potential for Transformative Change in the Green Building Sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(5), pages 1088-1107, May.
    11. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    12. Yun Gu & Deyuan Chen & Xiaoqian Liu, 2022. "Suicide Possibility Scale Detection via Sina Weibo Analytics: Preliminary Results," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Yang, Jingluan & Chen, Wei, 2023. "Unravelling the landscape of global cobalt trade: Patterns, robustness, and supply chain security," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    14. Geels, Frank W., 2006. "The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840-1930): The dynamics of regime transformation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1069-1082, September.
    15. Gavin Bridge & Ludger Gailing, 2020. "New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1037-1050, September.
    16. Zhi Chang & Huijun Yang & Xingyu Zhu & Ping He & Haoshen Zhou, 2022. "A stable quasi-solid electrolyte improves the safe operation of highly efficient lithium-metal pouch cells in harsh environments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Hafize Nurgul Durmus Senyapar & Ramazan Bayindir, 2023. "The Research Agenda on Smart Grids: Foresights for Social Acceptance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-31, September.
    18. Okay, Kamil & Eray, Sermet & Eray, Aynur, 2022. "Development of prototype battery management system for PV system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1294-1304.
    19. Charalambos Vlados & Fotios Katimertzopoulos, 2019. "The ¡°Mystery¡± of Innovation: Bridging the Economic and Business Thinking and the Stra.Tech.Man Approach," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 236-262, March.
    20. E, Jiaqiang & Xiao, Hanxu & Tian, Sicheng & Huang, Yuxin, 2024. "A comprehensive review on thermal runaway model of a lithium-ion battery: Mechanism, thermal, mechanical, propagation, gas venting and combustion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24003051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.