IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v78y2024ics0160791x24002239.html

Sociotechnical analysis of factors influencing IoT adoption in healthcare: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Kronlid, Carl
  • Brantnell, Anders
  • Elf, Marie
  • Borg, Johan
  • Palm, Klas

Abstract

This paper responds to previous calls for a deeper sociotechnical understanding of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption within healthcare. Through a systematic literature review, it synthesizes existing empirical research on the factors influencing IoT adoption, identifying 94 distinct factors grouped into 24 themes. By leveraging sociotechnical systems theory, the paper thoroughly analyzes these factors and proposes a specialized sociotechnical systems framework tailored specifically to IoT adoption in healthcare settings. This study underscores the current dearth of empirical research in this area and emphasizes the need for more studies, particularly those focused on the actual adoption processes of IoT solutions in healthcare contexts. By addressing these gaps, the review aims to significantly contribute to the literature, offering a novel sociotechnical perspective on IoT adoption that complements and enriches prior reviews that have predominantly focused on technical aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Kronlid, Carl & Brantnell, Anders & Elf, Marie & Borg, Johan & Palm, Klas, 2024. "Sociotechnical analysis of factors influencing IoT adoption in healthcare: A systematic review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24002239
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002239
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shojaei, Reyhaneh S. & Burgess, Gemma, 2022. "Non-technical inhibitors: Exploring the adoption of digital innovation in the UK construction industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Johri, Amar & Bhadula, Shuchi & Sharma, Sachin & Shankar Shukla, Amal, 2022. "Assessment of factors affecting implementation of IoT based smart skin monitoring systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Xu, Jinying & Lu, Weisheng, 2022. "Developing a human-organization-technology fit model for information technology adoption in organizations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Videsh Desingh & Baskaran R, 2022. "Internet of Things adoption barriers in the Indian healthcare supply chain: An ISM‐fuzzy MICMAC approach," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 318-351, January.
    5. Robert G. Fichman, 2004. "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 132-154, June.
    6. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    7. Sony, Michael & Naik, Subhash, 2020. "Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Xing, Fei & Peng, Guochao & Zhang, Bingqian & Li, Shuyang & Liang, Xinting, 2021. "Socio-technical barriers affecting large-scale deployment of AI-enabled wearable medical devices among the ageing population in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Liang & Zhang, Manyang & Jia, Lin & Yan, Zhijun & Yin, Qiuju, 2025. "Understanding digital therapeutics in disease self-management: A systematic literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Pomerlyan, Evgeniya & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Integration - Growth relationship: A literature review and future research agenda using a TCCM approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1106-1118.
    3. Tim Rademaker & Ingo Klingenberg & Stefan Süß, 2025. "Leadership and technostress: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 429-494, February.
    4. repec:rbs:ijbess:v:7:y:2026:i:6:p:686-698 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:7:p:384-396 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Shuchi Pahuja & Anita Agrawal, 2023. "Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 16(1), pages 108-138, June.
    7. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Cherley C. Du Plessis, 2023. "The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Appiah, Emmanuel Kusi & Gabrielsson, Peter & Rialp Criado, Alex, 2025. "The role of digitalization in early internationalization Research: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Lukas Wolf & Martina Steul-Fischer, 2023. "Factors of customers’ channel choice in an omnichannel environment: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1579-1630, December.
    10. Panta Maria & Xygkogianni Maria, 2025. "Digital Maturity in SMEs: A Systematic Synthesis Review and Framework Selection Guidance," Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 1-1.
    11. Ayomide Hannah Igbaroola & Katarzyna Woźniak-Jasińska & Agnieszka Sapa, 2025. "What factors truly drive crop virtual water trade? A systematic literature review," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Hosany, A. R. Shaheen & Hosany, Sameer & He, Hongwei, 2022. "Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 236-257.
    13. Lenart-Gansiniec Regina, 2022. "The dilemmas of systematic literature review: the context of crowdsourcing in science," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 58(1), pages 11-21, March.
    14. Lydia Novoszel & Tina Wakolbinger, 2022. "Meta-analysis of Supply Chain Disruption Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Honorata Poturaj & Anna Smok, 2024. "Interaction between a Human and an AGV System in a Shared Workspace—A Literature Review Identifying Research Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion & Grazia Chiara Elmo & Veronica Ungaro & Laura Di Pietro & Olimpia Martucci, 2025. "A Systematic Literature Review of Selected Aspects of Life Cycle Assessment of Rare Earth Elements: Integration of Digital Technologies for Sustainable Production and Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Hetemäki, L. & D'Amato, D. & Giurca, A. & Hurmekoski, E., 2024. "Synergies and trade-offs in the European forest bioeconomy research: State of the art and the way forward," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Vespestad, May Kristin & Clancy, Anne, 2021. "Exploring the use of content analysis methodology in consumer research," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    21. Biniam Getnet Agazu & Chalchissa Amentie Kero & Kenenisa Lemi Debela, 2025. "Transformational leadership and firm performance: a systematic literature review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    22. Assunta Di Vaio & Sabrina Palladino & Elisa Van Engelenhoven, 2025. "Digital Twins nei Sistemi Portuali e il contributo di GHG accounting: Una review della letteratura," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 211-236.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24002239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.