IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v210y2025ics0040162524006243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grounded theory modeling based on multisource evidence fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Yuan-Wei
  • Fan, Yi-Pin
  • Zhong, Jiao-Jiao

Abstract

Grounded theory, a mainstream qualitative research method in the social sciences, is challenged by ambiguity in the theory construction phase. Drawing on the Dempster–Shafer theory, this study establishes a new method: grounded theory modeling with multisource evidence fusion (MEF-GT). By incorporating the objectivity and precision of quantitative analysis into the qualitative analysis of grounded theory, MEF-GT enhances the trustworthiness and reliability of the constructed theory. In MEF-GT, after completing the coding phase, relationship functions are constructed between initial concepts based on the evidence extracted from the data. By assigning weights to each piece of evidence and assessing the reliability of their sources, relationships are fused layer by layer following the generalized combination rule until a quantified relationship function between categories is formed. In addition, more intuitive and expressive theoretical frameworks can be constructed based on category portfolios with different relational strengths. Finally, we demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of the method using a case study of the ecological development practices of marine ranching enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Yuan-Wei & Fan, Yi-Pin & Zhong, Jiao-Jiao, 2025. "Grounded theory modeling based on multisource evidence fusion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:210:y:2025:i:c:s0040162524006243
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006243
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ye‐Cheng Wang & Yi‐Pin Fan & Yuan‐Wei Du, 2023. "Ecological development practices of marine ranching enterprises in China: Case studies of early movers," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3207-3223, October.
    2. Nicole M. Deterding & Mary C. Waters, 2021. "Flexible Coding of In-depth Interviews: A Twenty-first-century Approach," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(2), pages 708-739, May.
    3. R. Burke Johnson & Isabelle Walsh, 2019. "Mixed Grounded Theory: Merging Grounded Theory with Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research," Post-Print halshs-03579864, HAL.
    4. Isabelle Walsh & Frantz Rowe, 2023. "BIBGT: combining bibliometrics and grounded theory to conduct a literature review," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 653-674, July.
    5. Zhang, Carol X. & Wang, Liang & Rickly, Jillian M., 2021. "Non-interaction and identity change in Covid-19 tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Laura K. Nelson, 2020. "Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 3-42, February.
    7. Andreas Wieland & Wendy L. Tate & Tingting Yan, 2024. "A guided tour through the qualitative research city," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 60(1), pages 3-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:jvpbw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:691-707 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alex Luscombe & Kevin Dick & Kevin Walby, 2022. "Algorithmic thinking in the public interest: navigating technical, legal, and ethical hurdles to web scraping in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1023-1044, June.
    4. Stijn Daenekindt & Julian Schaap, 2022. "Using word embedding models to capture changing media discourses: a study on the role of legitimacy, gender and genre in 24,000 music reviews, 1999–2021," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1615-1636, November.
    5. Özgür Özvatan & Bastian Neuhauser & Gökçe Yurdakul, 2023. "The ‘Arab Clans’ Discourse: Narrating Racialization, Kinship, and Crime in the German Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Yang Liu, 2022. "Paradigmatic Compatibility Matters: A Critical Review of Qualitative-Quantitative Debate in Mixed Methods Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    7. Yang, Yang & Zhang, Carol X. & Rickly, Jillian M., 2021. "A review of early COVID-19 research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research's Curated Collection on coronavirus and tourism1," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Scholdra, Thomas P. & Wichmann, Julian R.K. & Reinartz, Werner J., 2023. "Reimagining personalization in the physical store," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(4), pages 563-579.
    9. Christof Brandtner & Parham Ashur & Bhargav Srinivasa-Desikan, 2025. "Dynamic persistence of institutions : Modeling the historical endurance of Red Vienna’s public housing utopia," Post-Print hal-04907529, HAL.
    10. van Loon, Austin, 2022. "Three Families of Automated Text Analysis," SocArXiv htnej, Center for Open Science.
    11. Francesco Zecca & Saima Saima, 2025. "Pastoralism and women’s role in food security in the Ethiopian Somali region," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Jing Cheng & Xiaobin Yu, 2024. "Regional differences, distributional dynamics and convergence of multidimensional food security levels in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Sminia, Harry & Bohn, Stephan & Sydow, Jörg, 2024. "Path release among practices in the process of path constitution: How the MP3-path appeared in the field of recorded music," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    14. Javier Lloveras & Mario Pansera & Adrian Smith, 2025. "On ‘the Politics of Repair Beyond Repair’: Radical Democracy and the Right to Repair Movement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(2), pages 325-344, January.
    15. Nathaniel Poor, 2020. "Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 231-238.
    16. Wang, Yan & Luo, Ting, 2023. "Politicizing for the idol: China’s idol fandom nationalism in pandemic," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117741, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Yunfei Xing & Justin Z. Zhang & Yuming He & Yueqi Li, 2025. "Toward an ecosystem of non-fungible tokens from mapping public opinions on social media," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Nahyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2022. "Can International Students’ Risk Perception and Place Image Create an Advantage in Safeguarding Place Loyalty in Post-COVID-19 Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Raffaele Nacchiero & Giovanni Francesco Massari & Ilaria Giannoccaro, 2024. "Supply chain transformative capabilities and their microfoundations for circular economy transition: A qualitative study in Made in Italy sectors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8695-8715, December.
    20. Carballo, Rita R. & León, Carmelo J. & Carballo, María M., 2024. "A longitudinal analysis of the effects of COVID-19 on tourists’ health risk perceptions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    21. Joep Cornelissen & Victoria Stephens & Lee Matthews, 2024. "Unlocking the power of diversity for supply chain knowledge: Is pluralism in theorizing styles the key?," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 60(3), pages 3-17, July.
    22. Mangiò, Federico & Mismetti, Marco & Lissana, Elena & Andreini, Daniela, 2023. "That's the Press, Baby! How journalists co-create family business brands meanings: A mixed method analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:210:y:2025:i:c:s0040162524006243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.