IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i3p231-238.html

Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nathaniel Poor

    (Underwood Institute, USA)

Abstract

The questions we can ask currently, building on decades of research, call for advanced methods and understanding. We now have large, complex data sets that require more than complex statistical analysis to yield human answers. Yet as some researchers have pointed out, we also have challenges, especially in computational social science. In a recent project I faced several such challenges and eventually realized that the relevant issues were familiar to users of free and open-source software. I needed a team with diverse skills and knowledge to tackle methods, theories, and topics. We needed to iterate over the entire project: from the initial theories to the data to the methods to the results. We had to understand how to work when some data was freely available but other data that might benefit the research was not. More broadly, computational social scientists may need creative solutions to slippery problems, such as restrictions imposed by terms of service for sites from which we wish to gather data. Are these terms legal, are they enforced, or do our institutional review boards care? Lastly—perhaps most importantly and dauntingly—we may need to challenge laws relating to digital data and access, although so far this conflict has been rare. Can we succeed as open-source advocates have?

Suggested Citation

  • Nathaniel Poor, 2020. "Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 231-238.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:231-238
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura K. Nelson, 2020. "Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 3-42, February.
    2. Emma Davidson & Rosalind Edwards & Lynn Jamieson & Susie Weller, 2019. "Big data, qualitative style: a breadth-and-depth method for working with large amounts of secondary qualitative data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 363-376, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konrad Turek, 2025. "Accelerating social science knowledge production with the coordinated open-source model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 767-795, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathaniel Poor, 2020. "Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 231-238.
    2. Brian Heseung Kim & Julie J. Park & Pearl Lo & Dominique Baker & Nancy Wong & Stephanie Breen & Huong Truong & Jia Zheng & Kelly Rosinger & OiYan A. Poon, 2025. "Letters of Recommendation by High School Counselors in Selective College Admissions: Differences by Race and Socioeconomic Status in Letter Length and Topics Discussed," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(5), pages 1-35, August.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:jvpbw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Abramson, Corey & Li, Zhuofan & Prendergast, Tara & Dohan, Daniel, 2025. "Qualitative Research in an Era of AI: A Pragmatic Approach to Data Analysis, Workflow, and Computation," SocArXiv 7bsgy_v1, Center for Open Science.
    5. Rosalind Edwards & Susie Weller & Emma Davidson & Lynn Jamieson, 2023. "Small Stories of Home Moves: A Gendered and Generational Breadth-and-Depth Investigation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 28(1), pages 210-227, March.
    6. Heran Guan & Rossilah Jamil, 2026. "How recruitment signals become memes: competitive intelligence dynamics in ten Chinese AI firms," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Alex Luscombe & Kevin Dick & Kevin Walby, 2022. "Algorithmic thinking in the public interest: navigating technical, legal, and ethical hurdles to web scraping in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1023-1044, June.
    8. Lina Sandström, 2026. "Staying inside the bubble: the unequal consequences of limiting weak ties during the COVID-19 pandemic," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Stijn Daenekindt & Julian Schaap, 2022. "Using word embedding models to capture changing media discourses: a study on the role of legitimacy, gender and genre in 24,000 music reviews, 1999–2021," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1615-1636, November.
    10. Özgür Özvatan & Bastian Neuhauser & Gökçe Yurdakul, 2023. "The ‘Arab Clans’ Discourse: Narrating Racialization, Kinship, and Crime in the German Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Mangiò, Federico & Mismetti, Marco & Lissana, Elena & Andreini, Daniela, 2023. "That's the Press, Baby! How journalists co-create family business brands meanings: A mixed method analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Giebel, Sonia & Nürnberg, Charlotte & Nuhoglu Soysal, Yasemin, 2026. ""Diversity" in an age of global ambition: the case of German Universities of Excellence," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest ar, pages 1-25.
    13. Scholdra, Thomas P. & Wichmann, Julian R.K. & Reinartz, Werner J., 2023. "Reimagining personalization in the physical store," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(4), pages 563-579.
    14. Christof Brandtner & Parham Ashur & Bhargav Srinivasa-Desikan, 2026. "Dynamic persistence of institutions : Modeling the historical endurance of Red Vienna’s public housing utopia," Post-Print hal-04907529, HAL.
    15. Mariana Madruga de Brito & Danny Otto & Christian Kuhlicke, 2021. "Tracking Topics and Frames Regarding Sustainability Transformations during the Onset of the COVID-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    16. van Loon, Austin, 2022. "Three Families of Automated Text Analysis," SocArXiv htnej, Center for Open Science.
    17. Chih-Hsing Liu & Jeou-Shyan Horng & Sheng-Fang Chou & Tai-Yi Yu & Yung-Chuan Huang & Jun-You Lin, 2023. "Integrating big data and marketing concepts into tourism, hospitality operations and strategy development," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1905-1922, April.
    18. Ajith Venugopal & Sreehas Gopinathan & Marwan Al-Shammari & Tushar R. Shah, 2025. "A topic modeling and scientometric analysis of microfoundations of strategy research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 219-247, February.
    19. Ruofan Zhao & Zhengai Dong & Hongping Wu & Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Xinglong Yang, 2025. "Harnessing Big Data for Strategic Innovation: Insights into Corporate Entrepreneurship and Technological Advancements," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 5238-5270, March.
    20. Philipp Poschmann & Peter Walgenbach, 2025. "From Technical Conversion to Social Transformation: Organizational Interpretations and Public Discourse in the Case of the Digital Transformation," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 229-265, June.
    21. Hald, Julie & Gillespie, Alex & Reader, Tom W., 2025. "Problems in dealing with problems: how breakdowns in corrective culture lead to institutional failure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122814, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:231-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.