IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/339762.html

"Diversity" in an age of global ambition: the case of German Universities of Excellence

Author

Listed:
  • Giebel, Sonia
  • Nürnberg, Charlotte
  • Nuhoglu Soysal, Yasemin

Abstract

Diversity has become an increasingly celebrated concept worldwide but varies across national contexts and has been subject to intense debate. To understand the nationally and globally constructed nature of diversity discourse in higher education, we look to a national context where diversity initiatives are emergent: Germany. Funded by Excellence Initiatives that aim to raise the global profile of German higher education, German Universities of Excellence offer an intriguing case to examine the construction of diversity discourse in higher education. Drawing on neoinstitutional frameworks, we investigate the extent to which the diversity discourse of German Universities of Excellence echoes longestablished gender parity commitments and the extent to which it reflects the discourse of higher-ranked universities. To do so, we computationally and qualitatively analyse the text data of the diversity websites of German Universities of Excellence, comparing them with analogous text data from the top-ranking Times Higher Education universities. While gender anchors the German diversity discourse, there are also suggestions of subtle expansion and global resonances in the logics underlying diversity statements. These findings echo previous research establishing how universities create nationally distinctive forms of global legitimacy. We conclude with implications for diversity in global higher education during a period of intense political and ideological contestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Giebel, Sonia & Nürnberg, Charlotte & Nuhoglu Soysal, Yasemin, 2026. ""Diversity" in an age of global ambition: the case of German Universities of Excellence," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest ar, pages 1-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:339762
    DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2026.2614497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/339762/1/Full-text-article-Giebel-et-al-Diversity.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21568235.2026.2614497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kem Saichaie & Christopher C. Morphew, 2014. "What College and University Websites Reveal about the Purposes of Higher Education," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(4), pages 499-530, July.
    2. Jens Jungblut & Marc Jungblut, 2017. "All different? All equal? differentiation of universities’ mission statements and excellence initiatives in Germany," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 535-545.
    3. Zippel, Kathrin S. & Ferree, Myra Marx & Zimmermann, Karin, 2016. "Gender equality in German universities: vernacularising the battle for the best brains," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(7), pages 867-885.
    4. Rosana Heringer, 2024. "Affirmative Action Policies in Higher Education in Brazil: Outcomes and Future Challenges," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Hristio Boytchev, 2023. "Diversity in German science: researchers push for missing ethnicity data," Nature, Nature, vol. 616(7955), pages 22-24, April.
    6. Laura K. Nelson, 2020. "Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 3-42, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:jvpbw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mazlum Karataş & Andrea Löther & Lena Weber, 2025. "Gender Equality Plans and Inclusiveness in the European Research Area," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    3. Alex Luscombe & Kevin Dick & Kevin Walby, 2022. "Algorithmic thinking in the public interest: navigating technical, legal, and ethical hurdles to web scraping in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1023-1044, June.
    4. Nicola Righetti & Niccolò Bertuzzi, 2025. "Rethinking Veganism in the Digital Age. Innovating Methodology and Typology to Explore a Decade of Facebook Discourses," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 30(1), pages 96-115, March.
    5. Stijn Daenekindt & Julian Schaap, 2022. "Using word embedding models to capture changing media discourses: a study on the role of legitimacy, gender and genre in 24,000 music reviews, 1999–2021," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1615-1636, November.
    6. Özgür Özvatan & Bastian Neuhauser & Gökçe Yurdakul, 2023. "The ‘Arab Clans’ Discourse: Narrating Racialization, Kinship, and Crime in the German Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Andrea Löther, 2019. "Is It Working? An Impact Evaluation of the German “Women Professors Program”," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Elizabeth Knight, 2019. "Massification, Marketisation and Loss of Differentiation in Pre-Entry Marketing Materials in UK Higher Education," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Nathaniel Poor, 2020. "Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 231-238.
    10. Scholdra, Thomas P. & Wichmann, Julian R.K. & Reinartz, Werner J., 2023. "Reimagining personalization in the physical store," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(4), pages 563-579.
    11. Christof Brandtner & Parham Ashur & Bhargav Srinivasa-Desikan, 2026. "Dynamic persistence of institutions : Modeling the historical endurance of Red Vienna’s public housing utopia," Post-Print hal-04907529, HAL.
    12. M Jagadeesha & P Venkata Durga Rao & Aruna Polisetty, 2020. "Challenges for Expatriate Faculties to Teach International Business course in Ethiopian Universities (Case of Dilla University)," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(6), pages 151-151, December.
    13. Marlon Bautista Santos*, 2025. "Tracing Institutional Identity: A Language-Based Analysis of State Universities’ Mission and Vision Statements," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 6288-6302, April.
    14. van Loon, Austin, 2022. "Three Families of Automated Text Analysis," SocArXiv htnej, Center for Open Science.
    15. Stef M Shuster & Celeste Campos-Castillo & Navid Madani & Kenneth Joseph, 2024. "Who supports Bernie? Analyzing identity and ideological variation on Twitter during the 2020 democratic primaries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Ali A. Guenduez & Saskia Fuchs & Ines Mergel & Tobias Mettler & Sebastian Frowein, 2026. "From patterns to meaning: a mixed-methods framework that integrates computational and qualitative text analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 2713-2738, February.
    17. Sminia, Harry & Bohn, Stephan & Sydow, Jörg, 2024. "Path release among practices in the process of path constitution: How the MP3-path appeared in the field of recorded music," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    18. Du, Yuan-Wei & Fan, Yi-Pin & Zhong, Jiao-Jiao, 2025. "Grounded theory modeling based on multisource evidence fusion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Nathaniel Poor, 2020. "Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 231-238.
    20. Wang, Yan & Luo, Ting, 2023. "Politicizing for the idol: China’s idol fandom nationalism in pandemic," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117741, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Yunfei Xing & Justin Z. Zhang & Yuming He & Yueqi Li, 2025. "Toward an ecosystem of non-fungible tokens from mapping public opinions on social media," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:339762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.