IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v110y2016icp109-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart roadmapping for STI policy

Author

Listed:
  • Carayannis, Elias
  • Grebeniuk, Anna
  • Meissner, Dirk

Abstract

Roadmapping is a broadly applied management instrument for developing and implementing company technology and innovation strategies. During the last years this national science, technology and innovation (STI) policy makers have become aware of the potential roadmapping offers for strategic technology and innovation management and begun applying it in the context of STI policy and priority setting in this context especially. Still reality shows that roadmapping for STI policy purposes is by far more complex than company technology and innovation roadmapping.

Suggested Citation

  • Carayannis, Elias & Grebeniuk, Anna & Meissner, Dirk, 2016. "Smart roadmapping for STI policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 109-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:110:y:2016:i:c:p:109-116
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162515003236
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonid Gokhberg & Galina Kitova & Vitaliy Roud, 2014. "Tax Incentives for R&D and Innovation: Demand versus Effects," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 18-41.
      • Leonid Gokhberg & Galina Kitova & Vitaliy Roud, 2014. "Tax incentives for r&d and innovation: demand versus effects," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(3 (eng)), pages 18-41.
    2. Lee, Seong Kon & Mogi, Gento & Kim, Jong Wook, 2009. "Energy technology roadmap for the next 10 years: The case of Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 588-596, February.
    3. Marisela Rodriguez & Francisco Paredes, 2015. "Technological Landscape and Collaborations in Hybrid Vehicles Industry," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 6-21.
    4. Alexey A. Kindras & Dirk Meissner & Konstantin O. Vishnevskiy & Mario Cervantes, 2014. "Regional Foresight for Bridging National Science, Technology and Innovation with Company Innovation: Experiences from Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 29/STI/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Martin Jaekel & Arto Wallin & Minna Isomursu, 2015. "Guiding Networked Innovation Projects Towards Commercial Success—a Case Study of an EU Innovation Programme with Implications for Targeted Open Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(3), pages 625-639, September.
    6. Eva Dettmann & Iciar Dominguez Lacasa & Jutta Guenther & Bjorn Jindra, 2014. "Determinants of Foreign Technological Activity in German Regions - A Count Model Analysis of Transnational Patents," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 34-51.
    7. Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Karasev, Oleg & Meissner, Dirk, 2015. "Integrated roadmaps and corporate foresight as tools of innovation management: The case of Russian companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 433-443.
    8. Alan Brown, 2015. "Developing Career Adaptability and Innovative Capabilities Through Learning and Working in Norway and the United Kingdom," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 402-419, June.
    9. Nadezhda Mikova & Anna Sokolova, 2014. "Global Technology Trends Monitoring: Theoretical Frameworks and Best Practices," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(4), pages 64-83.
    10. Jay B. Barney, 1986. "Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1231-1241, October.
    11. Stilgoe, Jack & Owen, Richard & Macnaghten, Phil, 2013. "Developing a framework for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1568-1580.
    12. Mari Aranguren & Miren Larrea, 2011. "Regional Innovation Policy Processes: Linking Learning to Action," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(4), pages 569-585, December.
    13. Mario Cervantes & Dirk Meissner, 2014. "Commercialising Public Research under the Open Innovation Model: New Trends," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 70-81.
    14. Bjørn Gustavsen, 2011. "The Nordic Model of Work Organization," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(4), pages 463-480, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:spr:jknowl:v:8:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-017-0467-z is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rogge, Karoline S. & Pfluger, Benjamin & Geels, Frank, 2017. "Transformative policy mixes in socio-technical scenarios: The case of the low-carbon transition of the German electricity system (2010-2050)," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S11/2017, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. repec:eee:tefoso:v:131:y:2018:i:c:p:4-17 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:110:y:2016:i:c:p:109-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.