IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v221y2025ics0040162525003890.html

Stakeholder involvement in industry-level technology roadmapping: A political perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Nijssen, Edwin J.
  • Chakraborty, Swagata
  • Valkenburg, Rianne

Abstract

Technology roadmapping (TRM) is a popular and helpful planning instrument that can stimulate industry change. It benefits from stakeholder engagement to identify application areas, identify scenarios, and create ownership. However, few studies have looked at TRM and stakeholder management. Moreover, stakeholder management research has generally applied a rational and functional view. In contrast, we focus on the role of the TRM orchestrator and use a political lens. Specifically, we study the TRM orchestrator's micropolitical behaviors and focus on the use and impact of influence tactics such as gatekeeping, framing, coalition building, and promising to foster the creation of shared perceptions, reduce resistance, and muster support for the new technology. Based on the results of a practical case of smart urban lighting, we show how this political lens complements the stakeholder view. The findings help better understand the TRM process and outcomes. Drawing on our results, a new integrated framework is developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nijssen, Edwin J. & Chakraborty, Swagata & Valkenburg, Rianne, 2025. "Stakeholder involvement in industry-level technology roadmapping: A political perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:221:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525003890
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525003890
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Dougherty & Trudy Heller, 1994. "The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 200-218, May.
    2. Tierney, Robert & Hermina, Wahid & Walsh, Steven, 2013. "The pharmaceutical technology landscape: A new form of technology roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 194-211.
    3. Kerr, Clive & Phaal, Robert, 2020. "Technology roadmapping: Industrial roots, forgotten history and unknown origins," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Mahdad, Maral & Minh, Thai Thi & Dinh, Tran Thi & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2024. "Open strategizing for developing smart city food system: Stakeholder inclusion in practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Mahdad, M. & Minh, Thai Thi & Dinh, T. T. & Vanhaverbeke, W., 2024. "Open strategizing for developing smart city food system: stakeholder inclusion in practice," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-77:102516.
    6. Chakraborty, Swagata & Nijssen, Edwin J. & Valkenburg, Rianne, 2022. "A systematic review of industry-level applications of technology roadmapping: Evaluation and design propositions for roadmapping practitioners," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Lee, Changyong & Kim, Juram & Lee, Sungjoo, 2016. "Towards robust technology roadmapping: How to diagnose the vulnerability of organisational plans," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 164-175.
    8. de Alcantara, Douglas Pedro & Martens, Mauro Luiz, 2019. "Technology Roadmapping (TRM): a systematic review of the literature focusing on models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 127-138.
    9. Edwin Rühli & Sybille Sachs & Ruth Schmitt & Thomas Schneider, 2017. "Innovation in Multistakeholder Settings: The Case of a Wicked Issue in Health Care," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 289-305, June.
    10. Carayannis, Elias & Grebeniuk, Anna & Meissner, Dirk, 2016. "Smart roadmapping for STI policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 109-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Fleury, André Leme & Oliveira, Maicon Gouvêa de & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo, 2021. "Ecosystem policy roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Kumar, Aman & Shankar, Amit, 2024. "Building a sustainable future with enterprise metaverse in a data-driven era: A technology-organization-environment (TOE) perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Sinfield, J.V. & Ajmani, A. & McShane, W., 2024. "Strategic roadmapping to accelerate and risk-mitigate enabling innovations: A generalizable method and a case illustration for marine renewable energy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Chakraborty, Swagata & Nijssen, Edwin J. & Valkenburg, Rianne, 2022. "A systematic review of industry-level applications of technology roadmapping: Evaluation and design propositions for roadmapping practitioners," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. de Alcantara, Douglas Pedro & Martens, Mauro Luiz, 2019. "Technology Roadmapping (TRM): a systematic review of the literature focusing on models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 127-138.
    6. Yuskevich, Ilya & Hein, Andreas Makoto & Amokrane-Ferka, Kahina & Doufene, Abdelkrim & Jankovic, Marija, 2021. "A metamodel of an informational structure for model-based technology roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Raphael Cobra & Paula Sanvezzo & Marcia Branciforti & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2021. "Circular Technology Roadmapping (TRM): Fostering Sustainable Material Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Matavel, Custodio Efraim & Hoffmann, Harry & Kaechele, Harald & Löhr, Katharina & Bonatti, Michelle & Kipkulei, Harison K. & Njoya, Hamza Moluh & Massuque, Jonas & Sieber, Stefan & Rybak, Constance, 2024. "Does participatory research stimulate sustained adoption of energy technologies? Lessons from stove dissemination in Gurué district, rural Mozambique," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Marek Jemala, 2019. "Problematic Roadmapping for Companies in Less Developed Regions of Slovakia," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Wu, Qiang & He, Qile, 2020. "DIY Laboratories and business innovation ecosystems: The case of pharmaceutical industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Kim, Junhan & Geum, Youngjung, 2021. "How to develop data-driven technology roadmaps:The integration of topic modeling and link prediction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    13. Mahto, Raj V. & Belousova, Olga & Ahluwalia, Saurabh, 2020. "Abundance – A new window on how disruptive innovation occurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    15. Coccia, Mario & Wang, Lili, 2015. "Path-breaking directions of nanotechnology-based chemotherapy and molecular cancer therapy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 155-169.
    16. Cécile Ayerbe & Cécile Fonrouge, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations:études de cas et proposition d’une grille d’interprétation," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(2), pages 39-64, June.
    17. Alvesson, Mats & Sveningsson, Stefan, 2011. "Management is the solution: Now what was the problem? On the fragile basis for managerialism," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 349-361.
    18. Tzeng, Cheng-Hua, 2018. "How foreign knowledge spillovers by returnee managers occur at domestic firms: An institutional theory perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 625-641.
    19. Bryant Ashley Hudson & Gerardo A. Okhuysen, 2009. "Not with a Ten-Foot Pole: Core Stigma, Stigma Transfer, and Improbable Persistence of Men's Bathhouses," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 134-153, February.
    20. Norris F. Krueger Jr., 2000. "The Cognitive Infrastructure of Opportunity Emergence," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(3), pages 5-24, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:221:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525003890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.