IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v127y2023ics0166497223001384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symbolic or substantial? Different responses of state-owned and privately owned firms to government innovation policies

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, Tianyu
  • Wang, Xiaolei
  • Zhang, Li
  • Gao, Xuehao
  • Xie, En

Abstract

What influences a firm's response to government innovation policies? This study draws upon the institutional logic perspective to propose that China's state-owned enterprises, guided by state logic, are more likely to make a substantial response to such policies—a response that takes the form of the increased volume of invention patent applications, a steady grant rate, and market-related expenses. In contrast, private firms, guided by market logic, are more likely to make a symbolic response in terms of the increased volume of invention patent applications, a reduced grant rate, and increased market-related expenses and revenues. Results from our study, which uses a quasi-experimental approach based on an exogenous government innovation policy and data on publicly listed Chinese companies, support our arguments. These findings deepen the scholars' understanding of the effects of policy on state-owned and private firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, Tianyu & Wang, Xiaolei & Zhang, Li & Gao, Xuehao & Xie, En, 2023. "Symbolic or substantial? Different responses of state-owned and privately owned firms to government innovation policies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s0166497223001384
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223001384
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrei Shleifer, 1998. "State versus Private Ownership," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 133-150, Fall.
    2. Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Ardito, Lorenzo & Savino, Tommaso, 2018. "Maturity of knowledge inputs and innovation value: The moderating effect of firm age and size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 190-201.
    3. Kevin Zheng Zhou & David K Tse & Julie Juan Li, 2006. "Organizational changes in emerging economies: drivers and consequences," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(2), pages 248-263, March.
    4. Dai, Xiaoyong & Li, Yanchao & Chen, Kaihua, 2021. "Direct demand-pull and indirect certification effects of public procurement for innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Lily H. Fang & Josh Lerner & Chaopeng Wu, 2017. "Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Ownership, and Innovation: Evidence from China," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(7), pages 2446-2477.
    6. Lv, David Diwei & Chen, Weihong & Zhu, Hang & Lan, Hailin, 2019. "How does inconsistent negative performance feedback affect the R&D investments of firms? A study of publicly listed firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 151-162.
    7. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    8. Idris Adjerid & Alessandro Acquisti & Rahul Telang & Rema Padman & Julia Adler-Milstein, 2016. "The Impact of Privacy Regulation and Technology Incentives: The Case of Health Information Exchanges," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1042-1063, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Chun & Li, Shihan & Shen, Qi, 2024. "Science and technology evaluation reform and universities’ innovation performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. He, Qi & Wang, Chang & Deng, Chan & Zhou, Yifang, 2025. "Insisting or shifting technological trajectory? TMT attention and firms’ innovation responses to technology-forcing policy changes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Cao, Tiantian & Li, Weian & Zhang, Yaowei & Zheng, Minna, 2024. "Win–win or Lose–Lose? Dual logic, board factional faultlines, and ambidextrous innovation in state-owned enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Guo, Jingjing & Wang, Yueqi & Chen, Jin, 2025. "Policy instrument mix, financial slack, and firm innovation performance: Evidence from China's photovoltaic industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Liu, Kang & Ren, Yi & Yang, Fei, 2024. "Do national innovation policies lead to technological specialization or diversification? The role of path dependence and spatial spillovers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 499-520.
    6. Wang, Xue & Fan, Li-Wei & Zhang, Hongyan & Zhou, Peng, 2025. "Hydrogen fuel cell technology development in China: Technology evolution, city-cluster network and industry chain distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Leilei & Ni, Xiaoran & Peng, Yuchao & Zhang, Huilin, 2020. "Entry of foreign banks, state ownership, and corporate innovation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Trien Le & Amon Chizema, 2011. "State ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese listed firms," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 2(2).
    3. Doan, Anh-Tuan & Lin, Kun-Li & Doong, Shuh-Chyi, 2020. "State-controlled banks and income smoothing. Do politics matter?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Ciprian Stan & Mike Peng & Garry Bruton, 2014. "Slack and the performance of state-owned enterprises," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 473-495, June.
    5. Eduardo Levy Yeyati & Alejandro Micco & Ugo Panizza, 2004. "¿Debe el gobierno participar en la actividad bancaria? El papel de la banca propiedad del Estado y de la banca de fomento," Research Department Publications 4380, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    6. Zhan, Feng & Proelss, Juliane & Schweizer, Denis, 2020. "China: From imitator to innovator?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    7. Zhang, Yufei & Liu, Deqiang, 2024. "China's mixed-ownership reform and SOE profitability," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 496-520.
    8. Shen, Huayu & Hou, Fei, 2021. "Trade policy uncertainty and corporate innovation evidence from Chinese listed firms in new energy vehicle industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Habib, Ahsan & Jiang, Haiyan, 2015. "Corporate governance and financial reporting quality in China: A survey of recent evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 29-45.
    10. Pan, Xia & Cheng, Wenyin & Gao, Yuning, 2022. "The impact of privatization of state-owned enterprises on innovation in China: A tale of privatization degree," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    11. Eduardo Levy Yeyati & Alejandro Micco & Ugo Panizza, 2004. "Should the Government Be in the Banking Business? The Role of State-Owned and Development Banks," Research Department Publications 4379, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    12. Cai, Charlie X. & Hillier, David & Tian, Gaoliang & Wu, Qinghua, 2015. "Do audit committees reduce the agency costs of ownership structure?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PA), pages 225-240.
    13. Wei Wei & Yulia Muratova, 2022. "Executive power and politically connected independent directors: evidence from China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Jie Wu & Hongxin Zhao, 2015. "The Dual Effects of State Ownership on Export Activities of Emerging Market Firms: An Inducement–Constraint Perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 421-451, June.
    15. Zhang, Ping & Wang, Yiru, 2023. "The bright side of analyst coverage on corporate innovation: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Barry, Thierno Amadou & Lepetit, Laetitia & Tarazi, Amine, 2011. "Ownership structure and risk in publicly held and privately owned banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1327-1340, May.
    17. Castelnovo, Paolo, 2022. "Innovation in private and state-owned enterprises: A cross-industry analysis of patenting activity," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 98-113.
    18. Saibal Ghosh, 2018. "Electoral Cycles and Project Outcomes," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 16(2), pages 527-552, June.
    19. Clò, Stefano & Florio, Massimo & Rentocchini, Francesco, 2020. "Firm ownership, quality of government and innovation: Evidence from patenting in the telecommunication industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    20. Chi, Wei & Wang, Yijiang, 2009. "Ownership, performance and executive turnover in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 465-478, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:127:y:2023:i:c:s0166497223001384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.