IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/streco/v73y2025icp354-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-factor, multi-country testing of the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem without factor price equalization: A critical view

Author

Listed:
  • Liboreiro, Pablo R.

Abstract

Several recent empirical studies conclude that there is evidence in favour of a version of the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem that dispenses with the assumption of factor price equalization. However, many of these studies base their conclusions on small data sets, relating to one or two factors and a not very high level of disaggregation by industry. Moreover, the studies do not always take into account international differences in factor efficiency. In the present study, the Heckscher-Ohlin model is tested by considering data available in the World Input-Output Database (2016 release) for 7 factors, 56 industries and 40 countries plus a composite ‘country’ comprising the rest of the world, and by measuring factor use in efficiency units. Analysing this data sample, it is found that the capital and skill content of trade is only weakly correlated with countries’ factor abundance. This correlation is weaker when international differences in factor use are adjusted for relative factor efficiency and when the level of industry disaggregation increases. Paradoxically, this is not the case for the energy and emissions content of trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Liboreiro, Pablo R., 2025. "Multi-factor, multi-country testing of the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem without factor price equalization: A critical view," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 354-367.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:73:y:2025:i:c:p:354-367
    DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2025.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X25000128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.strueco.2025.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:73:y:2025:i:c:p:354-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/525148 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.